Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

PECKFORD – It is through their own Black Lives Matter colour lens, that others ‘will be seen’, it seems

What does Black Lives Matter Stand for? It’s confusing to me.

I was taught by a great high school teacher to always seek the facts, go to the source if possible. That teacher was always insistent that one clearly define what one means in our discourse

So that is what I am doing now.

In this present context, this is highly important in that some of what is being said will profoundly change the nature of our society.

Examining the Black Lives Matter website one can get some sense of what this loose organization is about.

In the first instance it is to promote the black people, as indicated in the section on ‘What We Believe’:

“We are unapologetically Black in our positioning. In affirming that Black Lives Matter, we need not qualify our position. To love and desire freedom and justice for ourselves is a prerequisite for wanting the same for others.

We see ourselves as part of the global Black family, and we are aware of the different ways we are impacted or privileged as Black people who exist in different parts of the world.”

So, it is through their own colour lens that others ‘will be seen’ it seems.

In another section the following is described:

“We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable.”

Now that’s a mouthful. Before I could sign up as is requested on the site, I would like to have some definition and elaboration as my good teacher would say. And ‘disrupt’ ... how would one do that? What does that mean exactly? Not violence, surely.

What is the Western prescribed nuclear family structure? Does western mean in the wester world? Or does it describe families in many parts of the world?

Then what does extended families mean... villages?

It is difficult not to think of medieval descriptions when one hears such words.

Does that mean that cities must go and we resort to the more rural and pastoral settings of the middle ages? Having villages will make transportation more difficult, won’t it. Does this mean we all work from home — with super wi-fi?

And then we read:

“We foster a queeraffirming network. When we gather, we do so with the intention of freeing ourselves from the tight grip of heteronormative thinking, or rather, the belief that all in the world are heterosexual (unless s/he or they disclose otherwise).”

All I get out of this is we cannot think in a male and female sense. There are many forms of gender types, and they are whatever it is a person describes that they say they are.

Finally, the following statement is made:

“We cultivate an intergenerational and communal network free from ageism. We believe that all people, regardless of age, show up with the capacity to lead and learn.”

It is difficult to know what this means; and how it would be practiced in real life.

Then there is the ‘2020 What Matters Most Campaign’ with the following highlighted for the election:

·         racial injustice,

·         police brutality,

·         criminal justice reform,

·         Black immigration,

·         economic injustice, LGBTQIA+ and human rights,

·         environmental injustice,

·         access to healthcare,

·         access to quality education ... and ...

·         voting rights and suppression.

Not one of these ideas is defined/ explained. Not one of theses ideas is shown how they will be implemented. Not one of these ideas are costed.

So, I am sure it will be difficult for many to embrace this movement given it lack of definition, implementation plans, and just how much it will all cost.

 

Brian Peckford was elected in 1972, as a Progressive Conservative, to the Newfoundland Labrador House of Assembly. He became Premier at the age of 36, and held the leadership of his party and government from 1979 to 1989.

Since leaving politics, Peckford has conducted public inquires for the governments of British Columbia and Canada, has served on numerous Boards including the CBC, and has been active in public affairs. 

In 1993, he and his wife Carol moved to British Columbia and they now live in Parksville, on Vancouver Island.

He blogs at Peckford 42.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

GORDON F. D. WILSON: When The Trick Masquerades as The Treat

Thirty-seven years ago, Halloween 1987, I became the leader of the BC Liberal Party.   British Columbia was badly polarized. Social Credit held one side and the NDP the other. It had been twelve years, 1975, since Liberal MLAs Garde Gardom, Pat McGeer, and Alan Williams had walked away from their party to join Social Credit, one year after the lone Progressive Conservative MLA Hugh Curtis had abandoned his party to sit with Bill Bennett, the son and heir apparent to long-serving BC Premier, WAC Bennett.   An unwritten agreement by the biggest Canadian political shareholders, the federal Liberals and Conservatives, decided that if British Columbia was to remain a lucrative franchise from a revenue perspective, they couldn’t risk splitting the electoral vote and electing the real enemy, the NDP, so no resources would be used to finance either a Liberal or Conservative party provincially.   “There are two sides to every street,” I was told by a very prominent Canadian businessman who cont

FORSETH: As a BC Conservative member, and campaign worker, I will again state that the fact these errors were found -- AND brought to light BY Elections BC -- shows the system IS working

Sadly, two and a half weeks after the BC provincial election campaign, those who want to undermine our political process are still at.  PLUS, we also have one who doesn’t even live in our country, never mind our province. I speak of the buffoon running for President of the United States, who has poisoned the well when it comes to faith in the electoral process. Just today alone, comments such as the following, were being made of posts that I shared online: ... all the votes they keep finding has just favoured NDP on in all critical ridings and soon they will flip another riding in favour of NDP, Come on. ... Elections BC has ridiculed British Columbians, and I no longer have confidence or trust in their process and competence regarding the results Then there are others online, with comments like these – who are claiming fraud in the October 19th election: ... Who is the oversight for Elections BC? They should be investigated for election fraud! ... Fraudulent election ... should be red

Rob Shaw: Eby should be worried why mudslinging missed the mark in B.C. election

  Why did a BC NDP election campaign overwhelmingly focused on attacking the character of the BC Conservatives fail to prevent a blue wave that came within 27 votes of toppling the governing party? Partly because voters didn’t much care for, or about, all the New Democrat mudslinging. They were just hopping mad about some very specific issues ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more