Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Are the BC Conservatives a spent force, before even having a chance to grow past their petty infighting and self-inflicted wounds?



What’s next BC???
Regrettably, as in the past, it appears that we will at least for the foreseeable future, continue to have only two political choices, seeking the votes of British Columbians … the BC Liberals, and the “SpeNDP”.  That is unless something changes, and changes soon.



Polarized politics in my opinion, whether on the Provincial or Federal level, always leads to dissatisfaction with voters.  We are a free thinking society, where a multitude of opinions, choices, ideas, and solutions can spring from.  With that in mind, how can all of that be funneled into just two choices, on the political front?



British Columbian’s have continually faced the same situation (two choices) since the demise of the Socreds in the early 90’s … and the failure of the BC Reform Party to gain traction in the 1996 provincial election.  The demise of the Socreds and Reform, in my opinion, came about because of a lack of relevance to voters, and self-inflicted conflicts; that has also (it seems) led to the same path of destruction which the BC Conservative Party appears to be in the midst of.



If that is indeed the case, then without a serious self-reflective look at the problems and issues it faces, the BC Conservatives will also continue their slide into the same obscurity and demise as Reform and the Socreds.



The Party has had a revolving merry-go-round of executive and board members resigning and / or leaving.  Any clear thinking party member, if they knew this, should be asking, “Why?”  Executive members elected by the Party membership in the AGM of 2014 are now gone, have resigned, or quit.  In their place there are now individuals who have been selected with no consultation of the membership.  As a former member, I would (had I known at the time) questioned this undemocratic process of hand-picked replacements.



As well, as I have mentioned in previous blog posts, the democratic decisions by the previous ELECTED board, to discipline and expel dissenters (who were using means outside of the party constitution to FORCE their way) … were reversed by this unelected board.  This with regards to the reinstatement of Alison Paton and company, along with a formal apology to them for the actions the party took in removing their memberships in the party.  This reinstatement of membership, and apology, was totally and completely in direct contravention of the BC Conservative by-laws and constitution.  Paton and friends WERE removed for just cause.
That said, if the un-elected Board and Executive choose to reverse the previous decision to expel them, then why were the members of the party not informed of this decision??



The secretive aspects of this, when found out, led further to members of the party abandoning it through the non-renewal of memberships, or like myself quitting and asking for their memberships to be cancelled.




Sadly British Columbians looking for a viable option have, in the BC Conservatives, a party in disarray, with no money coming in from donations by members, accumulating debt, and bills unpaid. 



The BC Conservative Party has always held its’ AGM in the Fall; not so this year.  Have they delayed the AGM until February 2016 in an ATTEMPT to clear up outstanding bills from the previous AGM, as well as the recent SGM, to enable them to run the much delayed 2015 AGM?



One would wonder because a quick look on Elections BC, for the BC Conservatives, allows you to view the 2014 financial report. The BC Conservatives as I understand it on the last day of 2014 had assets of $10,918.80, with liabilities of $42,172.56.  That makes a total deficit of $31,253.76. Given what must be declining membership, and a lack of media coverage, one could probably assume there has not be any positive figures for this year, and the deficit has likely risen.



A political party needs many volunteers, with a wealth of talents, skills, and backgrounds.  That includes people who can create working relationships with the media.  Where are these people in the BC Conservative Party?  The party has been near invisible in the media … there has been little to no social media activity … NO party, board, or executive members have been using social media; including Twitter using #BCCP hashtag.  The few rare occasion where the Party has been in the news has revolved around very narrow niche causes such as big game operators.



Check it out for yourself … all you have to do is a simple Google search under News for the BC Conservative Party --- there’s barely a peep.



Where is any news coming out about causes and issues important to British Columbians’.  While BC Conservatives need to come up with policy to deal with today’s issues, that policy MUST resonate with rural AND urban British Columbians.  More important however, the party MUST have a position(s) that clearly stand out from anything else offered by the Liberals and NDP. 



I’ll sound like a broken record again, but why has no party taken a look and adopted the Democratic Reform Agenda that was presented over two years ago by Independent MLA Vicki Huntington, and former MLA’s Bob Simpson and Jon van Dongen?  These three individuals, all from different places in the political spectrum, came up with an important document that has gone ignored by the BC Liberals and the SpeNDP.  I believe any party that is willing to adopt these policies … AND show they have policy and a platform can be shown to be an extension of democratic reform … can win the hearts of British Columbians, and become government.



Are the BC Conservatives a spent force, before even having a chance to grow past their petty infighting and self-inflicted wounds?  I have my doubts, but only time will tell.



I’m Alan Forseth in Kamloops and, for the moment, those are thoughts going through my mind.

Comments

  1. Do you have a copy of that document by Huntington, Simpson and van Dongen? I had forgotten about it but I believe you are correct in suggesting it contains some excellent common-sense suggestions for social and economic progress in B.C. - maybe like the "real change" we just saw federally, not in left-right terms but systemic and stylistic.
    There IS hope for #bcpoli but time is running out to get it done.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi John ... good to hear from you, it's been too long :)

      The link to this document is http://vickihuntington.ca/sites/default/files/Democratic%20Reform%20Backgrounder%20%28FULL%29.pdf

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2027: After a Decade of Decline, NDP Budget Delivers an Assault on Seniors, Working Families, and Small Businesses

Peter Milobar, BC Conservative Finance Critic, condemned the NDP government’s latest budget as the result of a decade of decline that has left British Columbians broke, unsafe, and paying more for less.   “After ten years of NDP mismanagement, this budget is an assault on seniors, working families, and the small businesses that drive our economy,” said Milobar. “The NDP have turned their back on the people working hardest to make ends meet and the seniors who built this province.” Milobar pointed to a new $1.1 billion annual income tax increase and warned that the government is piling new costs onto households already struggling with affordability.   “This government keeps asking British Columbians for more, while delivering less,” Milobar said. “The question people are asking is simple: Where has all the money gone?” Milobar noted that BC has gone from a surplus in the first year of NDP government to a projected deficit of more than $13 billion this year, while prov...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...

Labels

Show more