Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ICBA 'Thrilled' with C-69 Supreme Court Decision to Uphold Provincial Powers


This morning (10/13/23), the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the Impact Assessment Act, formerly known as Bill C-69, is unconstitutional. The Independent Contractors and Businesses Association (ICBA Alberta) is calling the decision an unequivocal victory for Canada’s economy and workers.


“We are thrilled with this decision and what it means for the men and women who work in the construction and energy industries, their families, and every Canadian. We all benefit from Canada’s responsibly-produced natural resources, major projects and infrastructure,” said Chris Gardner, ICBA President. “The Impact Assessment Act was an overreach by the federal government, and damaged Canada’s economy and prosperity, by driving away investment and creating uncertainty.”


ICBA supported the Province of Alberta as an intervenor in the case during Supreme Court of Canada hearings.


“It was important to add the voice of construction and resource workers to Alberta’s case,” said Gardner. “It would have been irresponsible to simply sit on the sidelines and hope for the best in something as damaging to the economic prosperity of Canada as this Act was.”


The Impact Assessment Act (or "No-Pipelines Act", as critics referred to it) inserted the federal government into environmental assessment processes for major energy projects, even though those powers are assigned to the provinces under the Constitution. It replaced the National Energy Board with the bureaucratic Canada Energy Regulator, and replaced the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency with the Impact Assessment Agency. The changes resulted in institutionalized jurisdictional duplication, uncertainty on time limits, and expanded discretionary practices, ultimately causing vague and uncertain timelines for projects.


The law ended up in the Supreme Court of Canada for a final decision, with the province of Alberta, ICBA, and some other provinces and groups on one side, and the federal government on the other.


The federal government’s added layers of regulation discouraged investment in major resource and infrastructure projects, to the point that in its own March 2023 federal budget, the government promised $25 million to “study the problem” and pledged to produce “a concrete plan to improve the efficiency of the impact assessment and permitting processes for major projects” by the end of this year.

 

“According to an analysis from the Canada West Foundation, 25 proponents have submitted projects for review under the new regime since it came into force less than four years ago – and all of these projects remain bogged down in the first two phases of a four-step process,” said Gardner. “The speedy review process promised by Ottawa was an illusion. And today, it has been rightly struck down by the courts.” 


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...
Post a Comment
Read more

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more