Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

DAN ALBAS: Trudeau's reaching for your wallet again


This week, Canada's Parliamentary Budget Officer (PBO) released the "Digital Services Tax" report, which analyzes the taxation implications of the Trudeau government's efforts to tax specific online companies.
The tax would target companies that offer services such as online marketplaces, advertising, media, and user data services.
As currently proposed, companies with revenues exceeding $20 million would be subject to a "digital services tax" equivalent to 3% of their revenues.
According to the PBO, implementing this digital services tax will generate $7.2 billion in tax revenue over the next five years.
This has raised concerns among industry experts and stakeholders. The main problem is that these costs will ultimately be passed on to Canadian users of these services.
For instance, many may remember the promise made by the Trudeau Liberal Government that they would not tax Netflix. However, when Prime Minister Trudeau decided to reverse that promise, the tax now appears on your monthly bill, and you are responsible for paying it.
This digital service tax has the potential to generate an additional $7.2 billion from Canadians over the next five years. However, this comes when many Canadians struggle to afford groceries, rent, or mortgage payments.
As these digital companies are predominantly American, discussions have arisen among elected officials in Congress who are increasingly advocating for retaliatory trade sanctions against Canada in response to the proposed digital services tax. The Biden administration had aimed to establish a unified approach for a minimum tax level to prevent multinational companies from exploiting tax rules through aggressive tax planning strategies.
However, the Trudeau Government has chosen to break from the Biden plan and proceed independently by implementing this digital services tax as early as January 1, 2024.
Another concern is that some online companies may choose not to offer their services in Canada, similar to Meta's (formerly Facebook) decision to no longer allow the sharing of Canadian news content on their social media platform in response to Trudeau's Bill C-18.
Many small independent news organizations have pointed out that this situation has adversely affected them. During the devastating August wildfires, it was frustrating for many citizens to be unable to share crucial online news information with their family, friends, and neighbours.
This frustration was amplified because much of the most relevant local media content came from small local media organizations.
The Trudeau Liberal government defends the digital services tax to ensure that large online companies pay their "fair share."
That leads to my question for this week:
Will Canadians likely be the ones who pay the Liberals' digital services tax? Do you support it? Why or why not?
I can be reached at Dan.Albas@parl.gc.ca or by calling toll-free at 1-800-665-8711.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...
Post a Comment
Read more

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more