Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

DAN ALBAS: Trudeau's reaching for your wallet again


This week, Canada's Parliamentary Budget Officer (PBO) released the "Digital Services Tax" report, which analyzes the taxation implications of the Trudeau government's efforts to tax specific online companies.
The tax would target companies that offer services such as online marketplaces, advertising, media, and user data services.
As currently proposed, companies with revenues exceeding $20 million would be subject to a "digital services tax" equivalent to 3% of their revenues.
According to the PBO, implementing this digital services tax will generate $7.2 billion in tax revenue over the next five years.
This has raised concerns among industry experts and stakeholders. The main problem is that these costs will ultimately be passed on to Canadian users of these services.
For instance, many may remember the promise made by the Trudeau Liberal Government that they would not tax Netflix. However, when Prime Minister Trudeau decided to reverse that promise, the tax now appears on your monthly bill, and you are responsible for paying it.
This digital service tax has the potential to generate an additional $7.2 billion from Canadians over the next five years. However, this comes when many Canadians struggle to afford groceries, rent, or mortgage payments.
As these digital companies are predominantly American, discussions have arisen among elected officials in Congress who are increasingly advocating for retaliatory trade sanctions against Canada in response to the proposed digital services tax. The Biden administration had aimed to establish a unified approach for a minimum tax level to prevent multinational companies from exploiting tax rules through aggressive tax planning strategies.
However, the Trudeau Government has chosen to break from the Biden plan and proceed independently by implementing this digital services tax as early as January 1, 2024.
Another concern is that some online companies may choose not to offer their services in Canada, similar to Meta's (formerly Facebook) decision to no longer allow the sharing of Canadian news content on their social media platform in response to Trudeau's Bill C-18.
Many small independent news organizations have pointed out that this situation has adversely affected them. During the devastating August wildfires, it was frustrating for many citizens to be unable to share crucial online news information with their family, friends, and neighbours.
This frustration was amplified because much of the most relevant local media content came from small local media organizations.
The Trudeau Liberal government defends the digital services tax to ensure that large online companies pay their "fair share."
That leads to my question for this week:
Will Canadians likely be the ones who pay the Liberals' digital services tax? Do you support it? Why or why not?
I can be reached at Dan.Albas@parl.gc.ca or by calling toll-free at 1-800-665-8711.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more