Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FRASER INSTITUTE: Only when Canadians are armed with facts can they make informed decisions about their governments


There are two major federal policy events on the immediate horizon, both of which have serious implications for Canadians: the planned carbon tax hike on April 1, and the federal budget on April 16.

 

Here is what you need to know.

 

Carbon tax hike:

Despite a majority of Canadian premiers calling on Ottawa to cancel this year’s hike, the Trudeau government plans to raise its carbon tax by another 23% on April 1st.

 

The government has claimed that a higher carbon tax will have ‘almost zero’ impact on Canadians.

 

But the Fraser Institute published an analysis of the estimated effects of a $170 per tonne carbon tax and found this claim to be completely untrue.

 

  • Canada will see permanent job losses of over 184,000.
  • The economy will shrink by 1.8%, which in 2019 would represent a loss to the economy of about $38 billion.
  • Even after taking the carbon tax rebate into account, the average Canadian will still have $1,540 less income every year.
  • Deficits are projected to increase by $22.1 billion, leading to more debt and higher taxes down the road.

 

This could almost be forgiven if it would truly solve climate change – but Canada’s CO2 emissions are about 1.5% of the global total, meaning that even if Canada’s emissions went down to zero overnight, global emissions would barely budge!


Federal budget:

In November’s fall economic statement, the government committed to keep the 2023/24 deficit below $40.1 billion.

 

But the Parliamentary Budget Officer projects the Trudeau government may once again miss its own fiscal target.

 

This wouldn’t be a huge surprise, as this government has a history of breaking its own fiscal rules. Since first elected, it has increased annual program spending by approximately 75%, and financed much of this increased spending through government debt.

 

After adjusting for population growth and inflation, the Trudeau government has recorded the five-highest years of per-person spending in Canadian history.

Like the carbon tax, this could be forgiven if Canadians saw value for the spending.

 

But what have Canadians actually gotten in return? According to another recent Fraser Institute study:

 

  • The federal government plans to spend more taxpayer dollars on debt interest in 2023/24 than on child-care benefits.
  • Future generations will have to pay off a debt burden that’s nearly double what it was when Prime Minister Trudeau was elected in 2015.
  • And Canadians are currently suffering an economic growth crisis that has left living standards worse in the fourth quarter of 2023 than they were at the end of 2014.

 

It is clear that nothing short of a complete reversal in federal fiscal policy is acceptable in the upcoming budget.

 

I’m happy to report that the above-mentioned studies, and their related commentaries, reached hundreds of thousands of people in newspapers across the country and on social media.

 

Only when Canadians are armed with facts can they make informed decisions about their governments.

 

Sincerely,

Niels Veldhuis, President
The Fraser Institute

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more