Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

STEVE FORSETH -- Electoral Areas need provincial/federal infrastructure grant programs that don’t force Electoral Areas to compete against bigger communities

This past Saturday – Saanich North and the Islands MLA Adam Olsen wrote in this blog about getting on with a fiscal framework for BC’s Local Governments -- which has been discussed for many years with Provincial Governments of different political stripes (Socreds, NDP, BC Liberals) however I want to look at this from an Electoral Area point of view…

There are 155 Electoral Areas in BC today (these Electoral Areas were created in 1965 along with the corresponding Regional District – 27 in BC today) each with 1 representative from each of these Electoral Areas.  And in of these Electoral Areas, there are quite a few unincorporated communities whose local government is the nearby Regional District. 

Electoral Areas can have total population ranging from 400 in the Hixon area (Regional District of Fraser-Fort George, Electoral Area ‘E’) to as much as 8,000 in the South Shuswap (Columbia Shuswap Regional District, Electoral Area ‘C’).  Each unincorporated community is unique in their own way and have distinct needs and it is up to the Electoral Area Director to advocate for those unincorporated communities in his/her Electoral Area at the local Regional District board table

For many years – Regional Districts’ have pleaded with both provincial/federal governments that their infrastructure grant programs are not designed to meet the very unique water/sewer and other community infrastructure needs in Electoral Areas and their unincorporated community needs. 

For example -- $10 million water system program, the Provincial/Federal governments might cover as much as $5 million of the costs (if the local Regional District is awarded a grant covering this cost) with the remainder being borne by local taxpayers (typically in the $2-4 million).  

These Electoral Areas typically can have many seniors’ have residing within them and have fixed incomes and any reasonable-minded Area Director is not going to commit a huge cost onto their small unincorporated community tax base for a basic service, even when it is very worthy…

What Electoral Areas really need is provincial/federal infrastructure grant programs that don’t force Electoral Areas to compete against bigger communities like towns/cities, with bigger populations, who have same infrastructure challenges but “bigger vote bases” to choose from. 

We also need the provincial/federal governments to share the “scorecards” to see why a particular infrastructure grant application failed so the Regional District can improve their next grant application

If we can have infrastructure grant programs designed for the different types of local governments in BC (Electoral Areas & Municipal Councils’) – I believe the goal outlined by MLA Olsen around having a robust fiscal toolbox for local governments, both Regional Districts’ and Municipal Councils’ to do their important work they do for their respective residents’, can be met.


Steve Forseth is a 2nd term Cariboo Regional District Electoral Area ‘D’ Director representing Commodore Heights – McLeese Lake on the Cariboo Regional District Board of Directors’.

He was recently was elected to the position of 2nd Vice President of the North Central Local Government Association for a 1-year term


Popular posts from this blog

THE SIDEWINDER -- Just quit your constant damned whining and do something positive about it

  Living in a democracy is a wonderful thing, but it comes with responsibilities such as voting and being involved. When the dust settled on Saturdays (October 24 th ) BC election, less than two thirds of the eligible voters * took the time to vote - but the loudest bitchers will probably be among the more than one third of voters who sat on their asses and complained about how all politicians are crooks, etc. How many of you constant whiners have ever done anything close to becoming involved; or do you just like sniveling to hear your own voice? Are you one the arseholes who likes to take advantage of everything our democracy has to offer, without ever contributing anything? And I don't want to listen to your crap about paying taxes, blah, blah, blah. There's more to making democracy work than simply voting and then sitting back and let others carry the ball for you. Too many people seem unwilling to get involved - and follow-up - to make sure elected po

AARON GUNN -- He is, at his core, an ideologue, meaning the facts of any particular issue don’t actually matter

Ben Isitt - City Councillor and Regional Director Victoria City Council and its resident-genius Ben Isitt is back with another dumb idea. Introducing a motion to ban the horse-drawn carriages that have coloured Victoria’s downtown streets for decades, calling them “an outdated mode of transportation”. Are you serious?   No one is actually commuting by horse and carriage. They are here for tourists and residents alike to interact with world-class animals and discover the magic and history of our provincial capital. It’s part of what gives Victoria its charm. And the truth is these horses are treated better than anywhere else in the world. They probably live better lives than many British Columbians.   And talk to anyone who works with these horses and they’ll all tell you the exact same thing: this is what the horses love to do. This is what they were bred for and trained for. This is what gives their lives purpose and meaning. But maybe we shouldn’t be su


I have just struggled through Cheryl Ashlie's column ( MacDuff’s Call: A political novice with a sizeable ego ), in the Sept. 22 edition of The Maple Ridge News. To say the least, Ashlie's comments are naive and show just how totally out of touch she has become with political reality. Ashlie lauds the decision of Darryl Plecas to accept John Horgan's invitation to become the Speaker of the House, a move described by almost everyone else as self-serving and a betrayal of the trust of the constituents who voted for him. Ashlie claims Plecas' turncoat move will help provide good governance but in making this claim, she fails to explain how he will achieve this lofty goal.


Show more