Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Really, do you go out and purchase an unknown bag of goods, when you go to the store, and then wait until you get home to see what they've given you?


OKAY ... there are three questions I'm wondering about, when it comes to British Columbians deciding on IF we change how we currently vote. And ... if we do, what that new system will be.

Question #1
Why are we not getting an explanation of who will decide on the proportional representative going to legislature.  As it stand now, they won't be voter elected but potentially, at least, party hacks. 

Right now many / most of us complain that our elected representatives DO NOT in fact represent us; instead represent they party they belong to.  Basically they do as they are told.  On the other hand, maybe they will be voter elected, perhaps by using the votes each has received, and picking the one(s) who received the most. 

Then again it would be fair to ask, "Will they be an MLA from the region they were running in, or just a floating not responsible to anyone but the party they represent?"

Are those not good questions -- and how many more can you add to just this one first question?



Here's another good one, I believe.  Question #2
If an MLA resigns or dies, during their term in office, how will they be replaced?  Will it be from the party slate?  Will there be a General Election, and if so, what riding will it be in if they are a floating MLA responsible only to the party they represent?  OR what other possible option, or combination of options might we be looking at?

Hmmmmmmmm ... no answer for that either.


And as for Question #3
Why is the government not willing to show us what the riding boundaries will be, for each of the three voting options we are going to be able to choose from?
I know, we're supposed to trust them.  Here's the thing though, I'm not will to make the buy, without knowing what I'm actually buying.  Really, do you go out and purchase an unknown bag of goods, when you go to the store, and then wait until you get home to see what they've given you?

Now here's what someone said about riding boundaries; "It is not the job of the government to change riding boundaries. The law requires an independent boundaries commission. And that process can take up to 18 months."

And they are right, of course.  It is not the government that decides this ... it is, or will be, an independent commission.

HERE'S THE THING THOUGH.  Anytime we have had changes to riding boundaries (and they were generally jerry-rigged), it was done prior to an election.  In this case, our GreeNDP government is wanting us to change how we vote, PRIOR to knowing what the boundaries will be.

I'm not really very comfortable with that.  And, what's the rush?  We've been voting the way we have for decades and decades; what's one more election?


There's still too many questions, and I for one am willing to wait to have a referendum, until we have all of the answers first -- or at least answers to the majority of the questions I have first. 

IF we all have an understanding that there WILL be a FAIR referendum on how British Columbians vote (on the future make-up of the BC Legislative Assembly), then we can go into the next election knowing NO party will attempt to subvert that will.

The NDP ... The Green Party ... the BC Conservative Party ... the Liberal Party.  ALL should be required to make that commitment

That's the way it really should be, shouldn't it, on a decision like this?

So, at the moment, I can safely say that I am not really warmed up to changing our First Past The Post option of voting.  That said, I am open to finding out more about the options that will be present to us this Fall in the referendum.  That's why I will be attending the Fair Vote Kamloops presentation with Dr. Dennis Pillion of York University, July 4th at 7pm, at the Clocktower Theatre at TRU.  His topic will be, "Changing BC's Voting System, Arguments and Facts"

Meantime, find out everything you can, on the options available to us, and don't be swayed, either way, by a chorus of clanging gongs.  Here's just a few websites that will get you started:

How We Vote: https://news.gov.bc.ca/releases/2018AG0041-001071
Fair Ways BC Could Vote:  https://fairvotingbc.com/join-the-campaign-for-fair-voting/fair-ways-bc-could-vote/
Vote No To PR: https://www.nobcprorep.ca/
Elections BC -- 2018 Referendum: https://elections.bc.ca/referenda/

In Kamloops, I'm Alan Forseth ... and I look forward to seeing your thoughts below in the Comment Section.
Labels:

Comments

  1. KurtJune 28, 2018 at 4:45 PM

    Thanks for this article. You pose some really valid questions that need an answer. My guess the answers will be made on the fly after the predetermined outcome is broadcast.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Blakre NewtonJune 28, 2018 at 8:49 PM

    I'll do my best to answer your questions. As to question one, I think that any form of the three types of PR will at least have had an outline of legitimacy should they be adopted. I cannot see for example MMP getting more votes than the alternatives, then shouldered aside in favour of one of the other two. I will point out that when BC was incorporated into confederation, British Columbians of the time wern't given the option of systems to choose. The way I see it is if it comes down to PR versus FPTP and FPTP doesn't win a 50% plus one, then it should be turfed. Just like PR will be. Question #2 is a good one, but let's look to BC history to see what happens. In 2013 when Christy Clark was defeated in Point Grey by David Eby, she basically parachuted into another area that was basically a shoe in. What's the difference then? It was basically acclamation with a (very) thin veneer of democracy. I think that in this case, it would depend on a variety of issues, but as say Germany, Switzerland and New Zealand have proven the answers are there. As for the boundaries question, the fairest way to do that would be an independent (but public) commission. They could again see how these disputes are dealt with by other countries with PR. It is for that reason I am in favour of MMP.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

“4.5 million hectares of forest lands have burned since 2023, and the best they can do is point to a 90-hectare block being salvaged?” ~~ Ward Stamer, Kamloops-North Thompson MLA

Today, BC NDP forest Minister Ravi Parmar made this pronouncement; ‘Removing red tape has sped up permitting, allowing for more wood to be salvaged, quicker’. 4.5 million hectares of forest lands have burned since 2023, and the best they can do is point to a 90-hectare block?    ~~ BC Conservative Forests Critic Ward Stamer While acknowledging the NDP government has recognized improvements were needed in permitting and accessing burnt fibre in a timely fashion, the reality is, they are barely making a dent in the problem.  This government's recognition that only seven percent of pulp mill fibre came from burnt timber in 2024-25, quite simply put, is a failure. And the recent announcement, just three weeks ago, that the Crofton Pulp Mill would be permanently closing, is proof of that.     Instead of Premier David Eby’s government addressing core issues being faced by British Columbia’s forest industry, they are doing little more than manipulating the facts, ...
1 comment
Read more

A message from BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer, and the Kamloops – North Thompson Riding Association

2025 was a busy first year. As a Caucus, we worked very hard to defeat Bills 14 and 15, legislation which allows the provincial government to move ahead without environmental assessments on renewable projects, and that also allows cabinet to build infrastructure projects without getting approval from local municipal governments. This is not acceptable to your BC Conservative caucus, and we will continue to press this government for open and transparent projects in the future.  Two things we had success in were having the first Private Members bill passed in over 40 years. The first was Jody Toors Prenatal and Post Natal Care bill, and then there was my private members Bill M217 Mandatory Dashcams in commercial vehicles (passed second reading unanimously and is heading to Committee in February). Regrettably, much of the legislation passed by the government was little more than housekeeping bills, or opportunities to strengthen the ability of Cabinet Ministers to bypass the BC legi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Wildfire waste plan torched -- Forestry critic Stamer calls BC's wildfire salvage rate 'a failure'

Claims that BC is making progress salvaging wildfire-damaged timber are masking deeper problems in the forest sector, the province’s forestry critic says. Last week, BC’s Ministry of Forests said mills in the province processed more than one million cubic metres of wildfire chips in 2024-25, up from 500,000 cubic metres in 2023 and representing about seven per cent of all processed wood. Kamloops-North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer said those claims of progress ignore the reality that only a fraction of burned timber is being used ... CLICK HERE for the full story
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more