Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Really, do you go out and purchase an unknown bag of goods, when you go to the store, and then wait until you get home to see what they've given you?


OKAY ... there are three questions I'm wondering about, when it comes to British Columbians deciding on IF we change how we currently vote. And ... if we do, what that new system will be.

Question #1
Why are we not getting an explanation of who will decide on the proportional representative going to legislature.  As it stand now, they won't be voter elected but potentially, at least, party hacks. 

Right now many / most of us complain that our elected representatives DO NOT in fact represent us; instead represent they party they belong to.  Basically they do as they are told.  On the other hand, maybe they will be voter elected, perhaps by using the votes each has received, and picking the one(s) who received the most. 

Then again it would be fair to ask, "Will they be an MLA from the region they were running in, or just a floating not responsible to anyone but the party they represent?"

Are those not good questions -- and how many more can you add to just this one first question?



Here's another good one, I believe.  Question #2
If an MLA resigns or dies, during their term in office, how will they be replaced?  Will it be from the party slate?  Will there be a General Election, and if so, what riding will it be in if they are a floating MLA responsible only to the party they represent?  OR what other possible option, or combination of options might we be looking at?

Hmmmmmmmm ... no answer for that either.


And as for Question #3
Why is the government not willing to show us what the riding boundaries will be, for each of the three voting options we are going to be able to choose from?
I know, we're supposed to trust them.  Here's the thing though, I'm not will to make the buy, without knowing what I'm actually buying.  Really, do you go out and purchase an unknown bag of goods, when you go to the store, and then wait until you get home to see what they've given you?

Now here's what someone said about riding boundaries; "It is not the job of the government to change riding boundaries. The law requires an independent boundaries commission. And that process can take up to 18 months."

And they are right, of course.  It is not the government that decides this ... it is, or will be, an independent commission.

HERE'S THE THING THOUGH.  Anytime we have had changes to riding boundaries (and they were generally jerry-rigged), it was done prior to an election.  In this case, our GreeNDP government is wanting us to change how we vote, PRIOR to knowing what the boundaries will be.

I'm not really very comfortable with that.  And, what's the rush?  We've been voting the way we have for decades and decades; what's one more election?


There's still too many questions, and I for one am willing to wait to have a referendum, until we have all of the answers first -- or at least answers to the majority of the questions I have first. 

IF we all have an understanding that there WILL be a FAIR referendum on how British Columbians vote (on the future make-up of the BC Legislative Assembly), then we can go into the next election knowing NO party will attempt to subvert that will.

The NDP ... The Green Party ... the BC Conservative Party ... the Liberal Party.  ALL should be required to make that commitment

That's the way it really should be, shouldn't it, on a decision like this?

So, at the moment, I can safely say that I am not really warmed up to changing our First Past The Post option of voting.  That said, I am open to finding out more about the options that will be present to us this Fall in the referendum.  That's why I will be attending the Fair Vote Kamloops presentation with Dr. Dennis Pillion of York University, July 4th at 7pm, at the Clocktower Theatre at TRU.  His topic will be, "Changing BC's Voting System, Arguments and Facts"

Meantime, find out everything you can, on the options available to us, and don't be swayed, either way, by a chorus of clanging gongs.  Here's just a few websites that will get you started:

How We Vote: https://news.gov.bc.ca/releases/2018AG0041-001071
Fair Ways BC Could Vote:  https://fairvotingbc.com/join-the-campaign-for-fair-voting/fair-ways-bc-could-vote/
Vote No To PR: https://www.nobcprorep.ca/
Elections BC -- 2018 Referendum: https://elections.bc.ca/referenda/

In Kamloops, I'm Alan Forseth ... and I look forward to seeing your thoughts below in the Comment Section.
Labels:

Comments

  1. KurtJune 28, 2018 at 4:45 PM

    Thanks for this article. You pose some really valid questions that need an answer. My guess the answers will be made on the fly after the predetermined outcome is broadcast.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Blakre NewtonJune 28, 2018 at 8:49 PM

    I'll do my best to answer your questions. As to question one, I think that any form of the three types of PR will at least have had an outline of legitimacy should they be adopted. I cannot see for example MMP getting more votes than the alternatives, then shouldered aside in favour of one of the other two. I will point out that when BC was incorporated into confederation, British Columbians of the time wern't given the option of systems to choose. The way I see it is if it comes down to PR versus FPTP and FPTP doesn't win a 50% plus one, then it should be turfed. Just like PR will be. Question #2 is a good one, but let's look to BC history to see what happens. In 2013 when Christy Clark was defeated in Point Grey by David Eby, she basically parachuted into another area that was basically a shoe in. What's the difference then? It was basically acclamation with a (very) thin veneer of democracy. I think that in this case, it would depend on a variety of issues, but as say Germany, Switzerland and New Zealand have proven the answers are there. As for the boundaries question, the fairest way to do that would be an independent (but public) commission. They could again see how these disputes are dealt with by other countries with PR. It is for that reason I am in favour of MMP.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Okanagan Farmers Face NDP-Created Water Crisis ~~ BC Conservatives

Okanagan farmers are facing a water crisis as government-imposed restrictions threaten to kill their crops and destroy one of B.C.’s most important agricultural industries. In perhaps the most water-rich province in the country, our farmers have been left high and dry by the NDP government. For nine weeks, Okanagan and Shuswap farmers have proposed solutions, only to be met with NDP foot-dragging. Now forest fires have come to these regions as they are simultaneously reckoning with a water crisis that has been made worse through years of government inaction. Vernon-area farms have lost 70 percent of their water, while Kelowna and Summerland growers face severe restrictions. This situation is unacceptable and cannot continue. Ian Paton, Shadow Minister for Agriculture, said the NDP is once again forcing farmers to pay for its own failure to plan. "Farmers and ranchers must be listened to when decisions affecting their livelihoods are made, and under the NDP, they aren’t," said...
Post a Comment
Read more

BC Conservatives Point to Warning Signs in BC’s Economy

While Canada posted modest job gains in July, warning lights are still flashing in British Columbia. Youth unemployment remains stubbornly high, leaving too many first-time jobseekers shut out of the workforce. BC also lost 3,400 public administration jobs in July, likely as temporary Census positions ended. “BC's jobs divide remains stark. Unemployment is far higher in business-driven communities like Kelowna (9.3%) and Abbotsford-Mission (8.3%) than in Victoria (5.0%). Government should be focused on creating the conditions for private-sector investment and job growth,” said Gavin Dew, MLA for Kelowna-Mission and Shadow Minister for Economic Development. “We need an economy where young people can find work, businesses can hire, and every region has the opportunity to prosper.” This comes as BC faces five straight quarters where more businesses are closing than opening, an NDP cabinet rift over job-creating projects like Tilbury LNG, and fresh signs that even the province's to...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH: That, to me, sure seems to fit with narcissistic personality disorder – AND - a definite sense of self entitlement

I think most people are aware of why England’s Henry the 8th created the Church of England. It was out of a belief that he should be able to do anything he wanted. And what did he want?  It was a male heir that would follow him and, at his death, become the next King of England.   His marriage to Catherine had not produced one, so he demanded the Pope to allow him to divorce her.  The Pope of course refused so Henry created his own church, and declared himself the "Supreme Head of the Church of England", thereby allowing him to annul the marriage. In other words, he wanted his own way, and because he had the ultimate power in England, he forced his will over the church. Many (most?) would say people suffer like that from 'narcissistic personality disorder'. The Mayo Clinic says, “ People with this disorder may lack the ability to understand or care about the feelings of others. But behind this mask of extreme confidence, they are not sure of their self-worth and are e...
5 comments
Read more

Labels

Show more