Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

They can call it what they want; Clean Energy Levy, Crisis Fund, Conservation Rate. At the end of the day it's a tax


HEY FORTIS ... what the heck is the Clean Energy Levy that I have just
recently noticed I am paying?  Looking at the back of my statement, under the Definitions and Explanation of Terms does not provide the answer, it is conveniently absent.  A search through Google however comes up with the answer -- a response directly from Fortis:
In addition to those charges, there are other items on the bill that we collect on behalf of all three levels of government.
  1. This includes GST for the federal government,
  2. the carbon tax for the provincial government
  3. and the clean energy levy, which goes toward supporting investment by the provincial government in clean energy technology.

HOLD ON A SECOND... the Clean Energy Levy sounds like exactly what we were told the Carbon Tax was for.  At least that is what the Government of BC states online in a section entitled, British Columbia's Carbon Tax 

(The BC) Government will consult on a new clean growth incentive program for large industrial emitters in B.C. The program is designed to keep industries competitive as they innovate to cut emissions.

There are two approaches to achieving this goal. The first involves providing incentives for interested B.C. facilities that meet a performance benchmark based on the lowest emitting facility globally – the cleanest in the world. The cleanest performers would receive the largest incentives. The second approach involves supporting investment in eligible emissions reduction projects.

New tax revenues will be used to advance important clean initiatives while building our low carbon economy.  

Good grief, it's getting near impossible to understand a bill any more, when it comes to the utilities we can't really do without. And furthermore, it's really is a B.S. way of getting more money from us, by attempting to make us feel guilty for using something we need.

Check out your BC Hydro bill, for example.  You'll find a Step 1 rate ... a Step 2 rate ... a Residential Conservation Rate ... plus of course the Basic Charge for 30 days service. Oh yah, and don't forget taxes of course.

Now all this came about, me looking at my Hydro and Fortis bills, because of the new (and latest) grab at our pocketbook.  It's called BC Hydro's Crisis Fund.  According to Global News, the BC Utilities Commission is, " ... allowing BC Hydro to collect an extra fee to create a so-called “customer crisis fund” that will be used to help people who can’t pay their bill."

By what right -- and what authority -- does the BC Utilities Commission, and BC Hydro, have the audacity to charge me for something I have not used?

And where actually, will this end?

Why would Fortis not be extended the same right to assess me for services NOT provided.

What about Telus ... Shaw ... Bell ... Rogers ???

And this new so-called Crisis Fund sure seems to be plagued by one of the biggest issues that 'charities' often times suffer from.  BC Hydro has admitted it will cost them .6 MILLION dollars to set up this Crisis Fund ... and then on top of that annual administration fees will be .9 MILLION dollars.   

That's a total of $1.5 MILLION dollars.  Those idiots at 
the BC Utilities Commission deserve to be run out of town!

A dollar here and a dollar there ... in the end it starts adding up to $10's and $20's, and then that starts compounding as even more extra fee's, taxes, and levies are added.

Government -- and it's agencies -- have an insatiable appetite for our money -- and as long as we're quietly willing to pay it -- they'll keep taking more and more of it.

They can call it what they want; Clean Energy Levy, Crisis Fund, Conservation Rate.  At the end of the day it's a tax -- and quite frankly, I've had enough of getting dinged for more and more of them. 

How about you?

In Kamloops, I'm Alan Forseth.

Comments

  1. Regrettably a public that coalesces around the belief that carbon is dangerous, dirty, and a pollutant will never develop the moral outrage necessary to truly fight the ever increasing tax costs levied on energy production. Thirty plus years of educational indoctrination has now misinformed a generation. To return to a rational scientific view, that without carbon all life will end may well be impossible without incurring the collapse of the existing economic system, the mistaken belief as well embedded in our society. And any rational, reasoned discussion has become impossible, with in Canada, political irrelevance remains the reward for questioning the 'global warming' status quo. While it's not that I think we should give up, the fight needs to focus on the source of legitimacy behind the goal to limit carbon as it is the goal to limit life on this earth.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH: Without a strong local presence, there is NO reason for anyone to tune in to local(?) radio

LOCAL HOMETOWN RADIO IS DYING … and without serious measures put in place, it will likely never see the light of day again. For well over four decades, the Canadian Radio and Television Commission (CRTC) has presided over its’ demise, and for that I say, “Shame”. Without out a word to say enough was enough, the CRTC has allowed corporate Canada to buy up one radio station after the other, and then allowed them to slash staff to the point where some so-called local radio stations do nothing more than air programming that originates from communities well outside the region in which they are located. Case in point?   On CHNL* 610 in Kamloops, the morning show hosted by Vinnie and Randi, DOES NOT originate from Kamloops -- it doesn’t even originate here in BC. It’s a program that Stingray airs across multiple radio stations in Western Canada. It doesn’t end there. Not only are Vinnie and Rando doing mornings on CHNL, but they also show up on sister station Country 103 … and of course o...

Conservative Economic Team Responds to Urgent Industry Concerns

 " For far too long, the BC NDP has ignored the economic challenges facing British Columbians. Manufacturing jobs are vanishing, forestry is in decline, and private sector employment growth has stagnated. Meanwhile, affordability has worsened for both families and businesses. British Columbians deserve better, and we’re here to deliver real solutions to rebuild our economy and create jobs that support everyday working people and their families ." – Gavin Dew, MLA and Shadow Minister for Jobs, Economy, Development, and Innovation.   December 3, 2024, Vancouver, BC – The Conservative economic team met today with business leaders and stakeholders to tackle critical issues impacting British Columbia’s economy. Attended by 9 critics from the Conservative Caucus, this meeting was convened by MLA Gavin Dew – Shadow Minister for Jobs, Economic Development, and Innovation - as a direct response to an October 30th open letter from seven of the province’s largest industry associations. ...

WARD STAMER -- We need certainly in our markets, and certainly in our fibre supply, before we no longer have a forest industry in this province

Image Government of BC I think we all realize that the threat of Trump’s 25% tariff is like other provocative statements he’s made in the past. That said, we should have reason to be concerned. Tariffs don’t benefit anyone. A tariff of that magnitude – included on our own softwood lumber exports, will make things more expensive for Americans, and cause friction in the supply chain. If imposed, a twenty-five percent tariff will be equally detrimental to the citizens and economy of the United States, as well as the people of BC. There are two things, however, of equal concern to the threat of punitive tariffs by incoming U.S. President-elect Donald Trump. One is our antiquated stumpage fees. It is a legacy from decades ago, and one incapable of responding to changing market conditions. We need to revamp our stumpage system to better reflect market conditions, and our economic costs. Instead, a value-added tax system will be instantly responsive to current market conditions and will encou...

Labels

Show more