Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

They can call it what they want; Clean Energy Levy, Crisis Fund, Conservation Rate. At the end of the day it's a tax


HEY FORTIS ... what the heck is the Clean Energy Levy that I have just
recently noticed I am paying?  Looking at the back of my statement, under the Definitions and Explanation of Terms does not provide the answer, it is conveniently absent.  A search through Google however comes up with the answer -- a response directly from Fortis:
In addition to those charges, there are other items on the bill that we collect on behalf of all three levels of government.
  1. This includes GST for the federal government,
  2. the carbon tax for the provincial government
  3. and the clean energy levy, which goes toward supporting investment by the provincial government in clean energy technology.

HOLD ON A SECOND... the Clean Energy Levy sounds like exactly what we were told the Carbon Tax was for.  At least that is what the Government of BC states online in a section entitled, British Columbia's Carbon Tax 

(The BC) Government will consult on a new clean growth incentive program for large industrial emitters in B.C. The program is designed to keep industries competitive as they innovate to cut emissions.

There are two approaches to achieving this goal. The first involves providing incentives for interested B.C. facilities that meet a performance benchmark based on the lowest emitting facility globally – the cleanest in the world. The cleanest performers would receive the largest incentives. The second approach involves supporting investment in eligible emissions reduction projects.

New tax revenues will be used to advance important clean initiatives while building our low carbon economy.  

Good grief, it's getting near impossible to understand a bill any more, when it comes to the utilities we can't really do without. And furthermore, it's really is a B.S. way of getting more money from us, by attempting to make us feel guilty for using something we need.

Check out your BC Hydro bill, for example.  You'll find a Step 1 rate ... a Step 2 rate ... a Residential Conservation Rate ... plus of course the Basic Charge for 30 days service. Oh yah, and don't forget taxes of course.

Now all this came about, me looking at my Hydro and Fortis bills, because of the new (and latest) grab at our pocketbook.  It's called BC Hydro's Crisis Fund.  According to Global News, the BC Utilities Commission is, " ... allowing BC Hydro to collect an extra fee to create a so-called “customer crisis fund” that will be used to help people who can’t pay their bill."

By what right -- and what authority -- does the BC Utilities Commission, and BC Hydro, have the audacity to charge me for something I have not used?

And where actually, will this end?

Why would Fortis not be extended the same right to assess me for services NOT provided.

What about Telus ... Shaw ... Bell ... Rogers ???

And this new so-called Crisis Fund sure seems to be plagued by one of the biggest issues that 'charities' often times suffer from.  BC Hydro has admitted it will cost them .6 MILLION dollars to set up this Crisis Fund ... and then on top of that annual administration fees will be .9 MILLION dollars.   

That's a total of $1.5 MILLION dollars.  Those idiots at 
the BC Utilities Commission deserve to be run out of town!

A dollar here and a dollar there ... in the end it starts adding up to $10's and $20's, and then that starts compounding as even more extra fee's, taxes, and levies are added.

Government -- and it's agencies -- have an insatiable appetite for our money -- and as long as we're quietly willing to pay it -- they'll keep taking more and more of it.

They can call it what they want; Clean Energy Levy, Crisis Fund, Conservation Rate.  At the end of the day it's a tax -- and quite frankly, I've had enough of getting dinged for more and more of them. 

How about you?

In Kamloops, I'm Alan Forseth.
Labels:

Comments

  1. garret seinenJune 23, 2018 at 11:36 AM

    Regrettably a public that coalesces around the belief that carbon is dangerous, dirty, and a pollutant will never develop the moral outrage necessary to truly fight the ever increasing tax costs levied on energy production. Thirty plus years of educational indoctrination has now misinformed a generation. To return to a rational scientific view, that without carbon all life will end may well be impossible without incurring the collapse of the existing economic system, the mistaken belief as well embedded in our society. And any rational, reasoned discussion has become impossible, with in Canada, political irrelevance remains the reward for questioning the 'global warming' status quo. While it's not that I think we should give up, the fight needs to focus on the source of legitimacy behind the goal to limit carbon as it is the goal to limit life on this earth.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more