Really, do you go out and purchase an unknown bag of goods, when you go to the store, and then wait until you get home to see what they've given you?
OKAY ... there are three questions I'm wondering about,
when it comes to British Columbians deciding on IF we change how we currently
vote. And ... if we do, what that new system will be.
Question #1
Why are we not getting an explanation of who will decide
on the proportional representative going to legislature. As it stand now, they won't be voter elected
but potentially, at least, party hacks.
Right now many / most of us complain that our elected
representatives DO NOT in fact represent us; instead represent they party they
belong to. Basically they do as they are
told. On the other hand, maybe they will
be voter elected, perhaps by using the votes each has received, and picking the
one(s) who received the most.
Then again it would be fair to ask, "Will they be an MLA from the region they
were running in, or just a floating not responsible to anyone but the party
they represent?"
Are those not good
questions -- and how many more can you add to just this one first question?
Here's another good one, I believe. Question
#2
If an MLA resigns or dies, during their term in office,
how will they be replaced? Will it be
from the party slate? Will there be a
General Election, and if so, what riding will it be in if they are a floating
MLA responsible only to the party they represent? OR what other possible option, or combination
of options might we be looking at?
Hmmmmmmmm ... no
answer for that either.
And as for Question #3
Why is the government not willing to show us what the
riding boundaries will be, for each of the three voting options we are going to
be able to choose from?
I know, we're
supposed to trust them. Here's the thing
though, I'm not will to make the buy, without knowing what I'm actually buying. Really, do you go out and purchase an unknown bag of goods, when you go to the store, and then wait until you get home to see what they've given you?
Now here's what someone said about riding boundaries; "It is not the job of the government to change riding boundaries. The law requires an independent boundaries commission. And that process can take up to 18 months."
Now here's what someone said about riding boundaries; "It is not the job of the government to change riding boundaries. The law requires an independent boundaries commission. And that process can take up to 18 months."
And they
are right, of course. It is not the
government that decides this ... it is, or will be, an independent commission.
HERE'S
THE THING THOUGH. Anytime we have had
changes to riding boundaries (and they were generally jerry-rigged), it was
done prior to an election. In this case,
our GreeNDP government is wanting us to change how we vote, PRIOR to knowing
what the boundaries will be.
I'm not really very comfortable
with that. And, what's the rush? We've been voting the way we have for decades
and decades; what's one more election?
There's still too many questions, and I for one am willing
to wait to have a referendum, until we have all of the answers first -- or at
least answers to the majority of the questions I have first.
IF we all have an understanding that there WILL be a FAIR
referendum on how British Columbians vote (on the future make-up of the BC Legislative
Assembly), then we can go into the next election knowing NO party will attempt
to subvert that will.
The NDP ... The Green Party ... the BC Conservative Party
... the Liberal Party. ALL should be
required to make that commitment
That's the way it really should be, shouldn't it, on a decision like this?
That's the way it really should be, shouldn't it, on a decision like this?
So, at the moment, I can safely say that I am not really
warmed up to changing our First Past The Post option of voting. That said, I am open to finding out more
about the options that will be present to us this Fall in the referendum. That's why I will be attending the Fair Vote
Kamloops presentation with Dr. Dennis Pillion of York University,
July 4th at 7pm, at the Clocktower Theatre at TRU. His topic will be, "Changing BC's
Voting System, Arguments and Facts"
Meantime, find out everything you can, on the options
available to us, and don't be swayed, either way, by a chorus of clanging
gongs. Here's just a few websites that
will get you started:
How We Vote: https://news.gov.bc.ca/releases/2018AG0041-001071
Fair Ways BC Could Vote:
https://fairvotingbc.com/join-the-campaign-for-fair-voting/fair-ways-bc-could-vote/
Vote No To PR: https://www.nobcprorep.ca/
Elections BC -- 2018 Referendum: https://elections.bc.ca/referenda/
In Kamloops, I'm Alan Forseth
... and I look forward to seeing your thoughts below in the Comment Section.
Thanks for this article. You pose some really valid questions that need an answer. My guess the answers will be made on the fly after the predetermined outcome is broadcast.
ReplyDeleteI'll do my best to answer your questions. As to question one, I think that any form of the three types of PR will at least have had an outline of legitimacy should they be adopted. I cannot see for example MMP getting more votes than the alternatives, then shouldered aside in favour of one of the other two. I will point out that when BC was incorporated into confederation, British Columbians of the time wern't given the option of systems to choose. The way I see it is if it comes down to PR versus FPTP and FPTP doesn't win a 50% plus one, then it should be turfed. Just like PR will be. Question #2 is a good one, but let's look to BC history to see what happens. In 2013 when Christy Clark was defeated in Point Grey by David Eby, she basically parachuted into another area that was basically a shoe in. What's the difference then? It was basically acclamation with a (very) thin veneer of democracy. I think that in this case, it would depend on a variety of issues, but as say Germany, Switzerland and New Zealand have proven the answers are there. As for the boundaries question, the fairest way to do that would be an independent (but public) commission. They could again see how these disputes are dealt with by other countries with PR. It is for that reason I am in favour of MMP.
ReplyDelete