Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’


How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative?


AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30th), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past.

Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates.

Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end.

Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.

 

For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intrusive government, gradual change rather than radical, advocating for free markets, and fiscal responsibility. From there, the divisions seem endless, as show by just these few:

Progressive conservatives … social conservatives … libertarian conservatives … centre-right conservatism … right of centre conservatives … far-right conservatives … and traditionalists.

So, with this kind of diversity, HOW is it possible to have a narrow definition of who, or what, is a Conservative?

I am the Admin on a political Facebook page, and there has been heated debate on this very topic.  That said, no one yet has defined what it is not be a Conservative.  The most ardent simply say anyone that has at one time been a BC Liberal can NEVER be a Conservative.

On that I call BS!

My question is, ‘How we should be deciding who is conservative enough to be called a Conservative?’


Is it a multiple-choice quiz?

Is it a Yes or No quiz?

Is there some kind of psychological evaluation?

Or this one, which is my favorite question to toss back at those who question anyone’s conservative bona fides:

“Is there a genetic blood test that filters conservatism?”

Here’s the thing, and it’s something anyone that follows BC politics knows – or at least in my opinion -- should know. 

The BC NDP pretty much have a lock on 40 percent of the vote.  While their share of the vote has been decreasing over the past 3 elections, the BC Greens have received, on average, 15% of the vote.

Those two numbers combined equal fifty-five (55) percent.

There CANNOT be any kind of a split on the centre-right, right of centre, or right.  They MUST work together to bring about the defeat of the provincial NDP in the next general election – whenever it may be.

So, my comment to the leadership candidates is this; ‘End the purity test’ and do it today! We are all Conservatives!




UPDATED (01/30/26) – here, in alphabetical order, are the websites of those currently seeking leadership of the Conservative Party of BC:

Warren Hamm – was first to declare but still no website currently available

Stay tuned regarding Bruce Banman – rumoured to be announcing next week


Labels:

Comments

  1. AnonymousJanuary 30, 2026 at 3:13 PM

    As an outsider to Conservative politics my observation is that the BC Liberals WERE the conservative party. And the SoCreds before them.

    The purity tests happen on the left too, but I think at this moment in time right or centrist leaning non-Conservatives look at the culture warriors and hyper partisan nature of the current party and its off shoots and think “we dodged a bullet with that bunch.”

    You cannot govern in BC without captivating the centre, a swath of voters that always lies outside your core base. Insiders of all parties love the purity tests (the federal NDP is going through that now) but those kinds of things are luxuries of opposition. When you govern you become more centrist. That how the Liberals stayed in power for so long and it’s why the NDP are holding on to power now. Being in opposition makes you hyper partisan and that runs the risk of alienating folks who would otherwise hold their nose and out you in government. You need those folks to have power. And you have to govern in a way that at least partially addresses their interests.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 
Post a Comment
Read more

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more