Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FORSETH -- Despite Premier Eby’s promises, BC’s forest industry continues its downward spiral

While BC Forest Minister Ravi Parmar boasts about the government planting 231 million tree seedlings in 2025 ... here's some facts people might be interested in.

During the 2024 provincial election, the BC NDP promised there would be
300 million seedlings planted every year.  

...
the BC NDP promised to plant 300 million trees annually across the province to “help increase forest resilience.”

How has that worked out, you might be asking?

Two years ago
there were 280 million seedlings planted (BC government news – 12/23/2024) -- last year just 231 million seedlings were planted. 

That’s 49 million fewer than in 2024 – and 70 million fewer than the promised 300 million.

An yet it seems BC NDP Forest Minister Ravi Parmar feels this is something to be proud of, as noted in an “X” (formerly Twitter) post he made on December 30th when he said:

"In 2025 alone, 231 million tree seedlings were planted in BC ... ensuring the land base stays strong for generations” ~~ BC Forest Minister Ravi Parmar

That's NOTHING to be proud of!

For several years now BC forests have been ravaged by wildfires, and yet despite promises made by Premier David Eby’s government, the future of forestry in British Columbia continues its downward spiral, as pointed out by the publication Business in Vancouver on August 13th of last year:


Tree planting in BC is set to decline for a third straight year, falling short of government promises as wildfires destroy forests & timber harvests decrease.”

 

Without the necessary seedlings being planted, the question has to be asked; “What will be left for loggers to cut in another 20 to 30 years?

 

To further compound the situation, BC’s Annual Allowable Cut (AAC) continues to decline.

In 2015 the AAC was just under 70 million cubic metres, which supported over sixty-five thousand direct forest jobs. By 2023 the AAC had dropped to just 39 million cubic metres – a loss of 45 percent.

Statistics Canada shows the result was a disaster for the province. 

During that same time (2015 to 2023) the provinces forest industry labour force was reduced by thirty-three percent ... and since then it has only gotten worse. BC’s Labour Force Survey shows the forest sector accounted for under forty-three thousand (42,800) jobs in 2024.

 


The BC Council of Forest Industries (COFI) raised the alarm back in March of last year saying that ... Budget 2025 doesn’t plan to meet the government’s commitment to harvest 45 million cubic metres, as outlined in the government’s election platform and Forest Minister’s Mandate Letter. Despite this commitment to increase the harvest, Budget 2025 projects a decline each year to 29 million in 2027/28, well below the Allowable Annual Cut of 60 million cubic metres.

Forests not being replanted to levels required, and a dropping of the annual allowable cut, can ONLY have one 
completely predictable result ... 

 

... the inevitable death of BC’s once proud forest industry.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Conservative leadership candidate would move some resource officials out of Victoria

... While he is emphasizing his usual campaign priorities including his leadership experience and plans for the future, Black also revealed a philosophy that he has yet to speak of publicly. While in the forest-sector dependent community of Castlegar, Black told Castlegar News that if he were eventually elected as premier, he would like to re-locate some bureaucrats from Victoria to the areas rich in the resource sectors they represent. “Why is the chief forester of British Columbia in Victoria, why isn’t that office out where the forestry is?” asked Black. “We need to get senior officials, that impact the livelihoods of our communities, out of Victoria and in offices elsewhere ... CLICK HERE for the full story

US Tribes Using DRIPA to Expand Influence in British Columbia

The BC Conservatives are sounding the alarm after receiving multiple filings in the BC Supreme Court in which U.S.-based Indigenous tribes are relying on DRIPA, UNDRIP, and the Interpretation Act to assert greater recognition of Aboriginal rights and direct involvement in British Columbia affairs. “This is a clear and growing sovereignty crisis,” said Scott McInnis, Critic for Indigenous Relations. “The Premier himself has referred to the DRIPA situation as an existential threat to British Columbia, and has said amendments are non‑negotiable. We are now seeing exactly why.” Court cases reveal that American tribes are attempting to leverage DRIPA to gain standing and influence inside BC. “It is becoming increasingly clear that DRIPA is being weaponized in ways never transparently disclosed to British Columbians,” McInnis said. “Allowing U.S. tribes to expand their reach into BC governance is deeply concerning and completely unacceptable.” One notable case, brought by a group of Alaskan ...

Labels

Show more