Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Eby government signs another land-use agreement, as they say one thing and do another, during DRIPA chaos


While promising to fix DRIPA, the Eby government continues to quietly sign binding land-use agreements that fundamentally alter how Crown land is governed in British Columbia.

On January 15, 2026, the government signed four ministerial orders advancing the Gwa’ni Land Use Planning Project with the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, amending the Vancouver Island Land Use Plan and changing how more than 166,000 hectares of Crown land can be accessed, developed, and managed.

“This is Land Act reform by stealth,” said Critic for Indigenous Relations Scott McInnis. “British Columbians already rejected these changes once. In 2024, public backlash forced the NDP to pull its Land Act amendments. Instead of listening, this government has gone underground, signing individual deals behind closed doors, just like we’ve already seen in places such as Squamish, Teẑtan Biny, and across Northwest BC.”

“The Premier admits DRIPA (the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act) is creating concern throughout the province,” McInnis added. “So why is his government still locking in permanent DRIPA-motivated land-use decisions under that same broken framework?”

These agreements are being pushed through quietly, announced late on weekends, and wrapped in carefully worded news releases that avoid telling people what is really happening,” McInnis said. “The NDP is deliberately avoiding public scrutiny.”

“This is dividing British Columbians,” McInnis continued. “People are being left to wonder whether land access, development rights, and long-standing property expectations can change overnight, without legislation or public debate.”

Donegal Wilson, Critic for Water, Land, Resource Stewardship and Wildlife Management, said the government’s approach is eroding public trust.  “Public lands belong to all British Columbians,” Wilson said. “They should not be governed through a growing patchwork of individual agreements negotiated quietly and announced after the fact.”

“No one knows how many more of these deals are in the works, which regions are next, or how far this approach will go,” Wilson added. “That lack of certainty is exactly why people don’t want to invest, don’t want to expand, and don’t want to engage with a regulatory environment that feels unpredictable and politically driven.”

McInnis said the government must stop signing new land-use agreements until it fixes the framework it admits is failing.

“You cannot say one thing and do another,” McInnis said. “Fix DRIPA first. Bring these decisions into the open. And stop rewriting land governance by stealth. Public lands must stay public.”

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Conservative leadership candidate would move some resource officials out of Victoria

... While he is emphasizing his usual campaign priorities including his leadership experience and plans for the future, Black also revealed a philosophy that he has yet to speak of publicly. While in the forest-sector dependent community of Castlegar, Black told Castlegar News that if he were eventually elected as premier, he would like to re-locate some bureaucrats from Victoria to the areas rich in the resource sectors they represent. “Why is the chief forester of British Columbia in Victoria, why isn’t that office out where the forestry is?” asked Black. “We need to get senior officials, that impact the livelihoods of our communities, out of Victoria and in offices elsewhere ... CLICK HERE for the full story

US Tribes Using DRIPA to Expand Influence in British Columbia

The BC Conservatives are sounding the alarm after receiving multiple filings in the BC Supreme Court in which U.S.-based Indigenous tribes are relying on DRIPA, UNDRIP, and the Interpretation Act to assert greater recognition of Aboriginal rights and direct involvement in British Columbia affairs. “This is a clear and growing sovereignty crisis,” said Scott McInnis, Critic for Indigenous Relations. “The Premier himself has referred to the DRIPA situation as an existential threat to British Columbia, and has said amendments are non‑negotiable. We are now seeing exactly why.” Court cases reveal that American tribes are attempting to leverage DRIPA to gain standing and influence inside BC. “It is becoming increasingly clear that DRIPA is being weaponized in ways never transparently disclosed to British Columbians,” McInnis said. “Allowing U.S. tribes to expand their reach into BC governance is deeply concerning and completely unacceptable.” One notable case, brought by a group of Alaskan ...

Labels

Show more