Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

UBCM Issues Update on the Future of RCMP Contract Policing

Although official confirmation has not yet been provided, the federal government has indicated its willingness to re-negotiate the 20-year RCMP Police Service Agreements (PSA) that are set to expire in 2032. This comes as local governments, including UBCM, continue to call on the federal government to directly involve local governments as part of any negotiations. 

Following the federal government’s 2022-2024 assessment of RCMP contract policing, the Minister of Public Safety, Democratic Institutions and Intergovernmental Affairs advised of the intention to work with provinces and territories on the renegotiation of the PSAs. However, a March 2025 white paper by former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, which recommended that the federal government end its contract policing program, combined with the subsequent federal election, re-introduced uncertainty.

In October, as part of the Federal-Provincial-Territorial Meeting of Ministers Responsible for Justice and Public Safety, the federal Minister of Public Safety, the Honourable Gary Anandasangaree, “expressed a commitment to negotiate with interested jurisdictions on contract policing beyond 2032.” 

One week later, the Minister of Public Safety re-iterated this position to the Standing Senate Committee on National Security, Defence and Veterans Affairs.

While it appears that the federal government will seek new PSAs with interested contract partners, the role of local governments, as part of any negotiations, remains unclear. Local governments contribute more towards RCMP policing in BC than the federal and provincial governments. 

In 2024, this amounted to $855.5 million, up by 10% ($76.4 million) from the previous year. 

Despite this financial contribution, and the role that the RCMP plays in communities across Canada, the federal government has been unwilling to commit to directly including local governments in PSA negotiations.   

UBCM delivered a letter in September 2025, along with all Western Canadian local government associations, to the Prime Minister and Minister of Public Safety, requesting direct involvement in any upcoming PSA negotiations. Reasons given for this request included the financial impact on local governments, as well as their unique interests separate from provincial and territorial governments. 

One week later, at UBCM’s Annual Convention, members endorsed a special resolution calling on the Province and federal government to directly involve UBCM and BC local governments as part of PSA negotiations; and, that local government priorities be considered as part of this process. 

As the federal government ponders next steps in the process to negotiate new PSAs, the Province of BC is still considering recommendations made by the all-party Special Committee on Reforming the Police Act, including whether to implement a new provincial police service to replace the RCMP. 

UBCM continues to oppose this option, citing a lack of evidence to support such a significant change. 

 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Conservative leadership candidate would move some resource officials out of Victoria

... While he is emphasizing his usual campaign priorities including his leadership experience and plans for the future, Black also revealed a philosophy that he has yet to speak of publicly. While in the forest-sector dependent community of Castlegar, Black told Castlegar News that if he were eventually elected as premier, he would like to re-locate some bureaucrats from Victoria to the areas rich in the resource sectors they represent. “Why is the chief forester of British Columbia in Victoria, why isn’t that office out where the forestry is?” asked Black. “We need to get senior officials, that impact the livelihoods of our communities, out of Victoria and in offices elsewhere ... CLICK HERE for the full story
Post a Comment
Read more

US Tribes Using DRIPA to Expand Influence in British Columbia

The BC Conservatives are sounding the alarm after receiving multiple filings in the BC Supreme Court in which U.S.-based Indigenous tribes are relying on DRIPA, UNDRIP, and the Interpretation Act to assert greater recognition of Aboriginal rights and direct involvement in British Columbia affairs. “This is a clear and growing sovereignty crisis,” said Scott McInnis, Critic for Indigenous Relations. “The Premier himself has referred to the DRIPA situation as an existential threat to British Columbia, and has said amendments are non‑negotiable. We are now seeing exactly why.” Court cases reveal that American tribes are attempting to leverage DRIPA to gain standing and influence inside BC. “It is becoming increasingly clear that DRIPA is being weaponized in ways never transparently disclosed to British Columbians,” McInnis said. “Allowing U.S. tribes to expand their reach into BC governance is deeply concerning and completely unacceptable.” One notable case, brought by a group of Alaskan ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more