Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit: Atli Resources LP 


BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility

 

As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility.

The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia.

“British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said
Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcements and press releases do not translate into real-world outcomes for workers, contractors, or Indigenous partners.”

The Eby government provided public tax dollars to support the acquisition and operation of the Beaver Cove facility and repeatedly promised that its reconciliation and forestry policies would bring certainty and stability to the sector. Instead, forestry communities are facing fibre shortages, delayed approvals, and weakened supply chains, leaving facilities like Beaver Cove exposed when markets shift. 

“This is not a failure of workers or communities,” said
Anna Kindy, MLA for North Island. “Around 20 people are losing their jobs, and the ripple effects will be felt by contractors, suppliers, and local businesses across the North Island. This is the result of a policy environment that creates uncertainty, delays approvals, and makes long-term planning impossible. Forestry communities are paying the price.”

Scott McInnis, Critic for Indigenous Relations, said the closure highlights the growing gap between government rhetoric and economic reality.

“Just last week, the province proudly announced a new land use planning agreement with the very First Nation that is a majority owner of this mill,” said Scott McInnis, Critic for Indigenous Relations. 

“That agreement was brought forward under the government’s DRIPA-driven land governance approach, yet it comes far too late for the workers who are now losing their jobs. Reconciliation and land use frameworks cannot be treated as ends in themselves. If they are not paired with timely decisions, clear accountability, and policies that actually keep facilities operating, then government is simply managing process while communities lose paycheques.”

Stamer said British Columbia cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

“Forestry is not just another sector,” Stamer added. “It is the economic foundation of communities across this province. When government fails to get forestry right, entire regions feel the consequences.”

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Conservative leadership candidate would move some resource officials out of Victoria

... While he is emphasizing his usual campaign priorities including his leadership experience and plans for the future, Black also revealed a philosophy that he has yet to speak of publicly. While in the forest-sector dependent community of Castlegar, Black told Castlegar News that if he were eventually elected as premier, he would like to re-locate some bureaucrats from Victoria to the areas rich in the resource sectors they represent. “Why is the chief forester of British Columbia in Victoria, why isn’t that office out where the forestry is?” asked Black. “We need to get senior officials, that impact the livelihoods of our communities, out of Victoria and in offices elsewhere ... CLICK HERE for the full story

US Tribes Using DRIPA to Expand Influence in British Columbia

The BC Conservatives are sounding the alarm after receiving multiple filings in the BC Supreme Court in which U.S.-based Indigenous tribes are relying on DRIPA, UNDRIP, and the Interpretation Act to assert greater recognition of Aboriginal rights and direct involvement in British Columbia affairs. “This is a clear and growing sovereignty crisis,” said Scott McInnis, Critic for Indigenous Relations. “The Premier himself has referred to the DRIPA situation as an existential threat to British Columbia, and has said amendments are non‑negotiable. We are now seeing exactly why.” Court cases reveal that American tribes are attempting to leverage DRIPA to gain standing and influence inside BC. “It is becoming increasingly clear that DRIPA is being weaponized in ways never transparently disclosed to British Columbians,” McInnis said. “Allowing U.S. tribes to expand their reach into BC governance is deeply concerning and completely unacceptable.” One notable case, brought by a group of Alaskan ...

Labels

Show more