Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Silence is accelerating Alberta’s democratic decline


Fear of repercussions is driving moderates away from participating in public debate in Alberta


Democracy in Alberta is eroding not because extremists are loud, but because too many people who consider themselves reasonable, moderate and pragmatic have gone silent.

Too many Albertans in the political middle ground assume that staying quiet, staying neutral or staying out of politics preserves civility. It does not. Silence is accelerating the decay of democratic culture in this province.

Politics and democracy are inseparable. To disengage from politics is to weaken democracy itself. Voting every four years is not enough. Democracy requires ongoing participation, public expression and civic courage between elections.

The political middle ground in Alberta once anchored civil discourse. It was a space where disagreement was tempered by respect, humility and reason. That middle ground is now eroding beneath our feet. It is fracturing, fragmenting and being paved over by polarization and fear.

Joni Mitchell captured the danger decades ago. “You don’t know what you got … til it’s gone.” Alberta is learning that lesson in real time.

What is driving this erosion is not indifference alone, but fear. Fear of professional repercussions. Fear of social backlash. Fear of online harassment. Fear of being labelled, targeted or isolated.

These sentiments surface repeatedly in conversations across Alberta’s private and public sectors. People who privately express concern about the province’s political direction decline to speak publicly. They believe engagement is futile. They believe the costs outweigh the benefits.

“I don’t post about politics because I’m worried about repercussions at work.”

“There’s no point trying to have a discussion anymore.”

“The far right/far left shuts everything down.”

Whether every fear is justified is beside the point. The fear itself is real, and it is shaping behaviour. That behaviour has consequences.

Democracy cannot function when participation retreats behind closed doors. Private agreement is politically meaningless. Civic life does not respond to silent approval. It responds to visible, sustained engagement.

I speak from experience. I once had an employer instruct me to remove media commentary critical of United Conservative Party (UCP) policy that I believed was harmful to Alberta’s energy sector. I refused. That policy was later withdrawn. I am no longer with that employer, and I am better off for it.

The episode reinforced two realities. First, political engagement often carries personal and professional risk. Second, free expression matters more than comfort, particularly as democratic norms erode elsewhere, including in the United States.

A culture that stifles public expression is incompatible with a healthy democracy. Nor should anyone accept it.

This erosion is now evident in the rise of separatist rhetoric in Alberta. Calls for Alberta separation have gained renewed visibility in recent years through organized advocacy groups, public rallies and online campaigns. The movement presents itself as economic realism, but it collapses under scrutiny. It is a hollow performance that exploits grievance while undermining democratic cohesion.

The loudest voices dominate because too many reasonable ones have withdrawn. Social media rewards extremity. Silence creates a vacuum. That vacuum is being filled by the loudest and most extreme voices.

Ironically, my inbox tells a different story. Messages of private support arrive regularly from professionals, executives and community leaders who reject polarization and oppose separatism. Yet many of those same individuals will not speak publicly. They calculate the risk and opt out.

That is the tragedy. Democracy does not fail only when bad ideas win. It fails when good people decide not to contest them.

If you believe the political middle ground has served Alberta well, then it must be defended. Not privately. Not passively. Publicly and persistently.

Democracy does not survive timidity. It survives participation.


Bill Whitelaw is a director and advisor to many industry boards, including the Canadian Society for Evolving Energy, which he chairs. He speaks and comments frequently on the subjects of social licence, innovation and technology, and energy supply networks.


© Troy Media

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BC’s Forestry Decline Is a Policy Failure, Not a Market Reality -- Forestry Critic Calls for Accountability and Urgent Policy Reset

Conservative Party of BC Forestry Critic, and Kamloops - North Thompson MLA,  Ward Stamer As the Truck Loggers Association convention begins today, BC Conservative Forestry Critic Ward Stamer says British Columbia’s forestry crisis is the result of government mismanagement, not market forces, and that an urgent policy reset is needed to restore certainty, sustainability, and accountability. “For generations, forestry supported families and communities across BC,” said Stamer.  “Today, mills are closing, contractors are parking equipment, and families are being forced to leave home, not because the resource is gone, but because policy has failed.” Government data shows timber shipment values dropped by more than half a billion dollars in the past year, with harvest levels falling by roughly 50 per cent in just four years. At the same time, prolonged permitting timelines, unreliable fibre access, outdated forest inventories, and rising costs have made long-term planning impossib...

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...

Labels

Show more