Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Silence is accelerating Alberta’s democratic decline


Fear of repercussions is driving moderates away from participating in public debate in Alberta


Democracy in Alberta is eroding not because extremists are loud, but because too many people who consider themselves reasonable, moderate and pragmatic have gone silent.

Too many Albertans in the political middle ground assume that staying quiet, staying neutral or staying out of politics preserves civility. It does not. Silence is accelerating the decay of democratic culture in this province.

Politics and democracy are inseparable. To disengage from politics is to weaken democracy itself. Voting every four years is not enough. Democracy requires ongoing participation, public expression and civic courage between elections.

The political middle ground in Alberta once anchored civil discourse. It was a space where disagreement was tempered by respect, humility and reason. That middle ground is now eroding beneath our feet. It is fracturing, fragmenting and being paved over by polarization and fear.

Joni Mitchell captured the danger decades ago. “You don’t know what you got … til it’s gone.” Alberta is learning that lesson in real time.

What is driving this erosion is not indifference alone, but fear. Fear of professional repercussions. Fear of social backlash. Fear of online harassment. Fear of being labelled, targeted or isolated.

These sentiments surface repeatedly in conversations across Alberta’s private and public sectors. People who privately express concern about the province’s political direction decline to speak publicly. They believe engagement is futile. They believe the costs outweigh the benefits.

“I don’t post about politics because I’m worried about repercussions at work.”

“There’s no point trying to have a discussion anymore.”

“The far right/far left shuts everything down.”

Whether every fear is justified is beside the point. The fear itself is real, and it is shaping behaviour. That behaviour has consequences.

Democracy cannot function when participation retreats behind closed doors. Private agreement is politically meaningless. Civic life does not respond to silent approval. It responds to visible, sustained engagement.

I speak from experience. I once had an employer instruct me to remove media commentary critical of United Conservative Party (UCP) policy that I believed was harmful to Alberta’s energy sector. I refused. That policy was later withdrawn. I am no longer with that employer, and I am better off for it.

The episode reinforced two realities. First, political engagement often carries personal and professional risk. Second, free expression matters more than comfort, particularly as democratic norms erode elsewhere, including in the United States.

A culture that stifles public expression is incompatible with a healthy democracy. Nor should anyone accept it.

This erosion is now evident in the rise of separatist rhetoric in Alberta. Calls for Alberta separation have gained renewed visibility in recent years through organized advocacy groups, public rallies and online campaigns. The movement presents itself as economic realism, but it collapses under scrutiny. It is a hollow performance that exploits grievance while undermining democratic cohesion.

The loudest voices dominate because too many reasonable ones have withdrawn. Social media rewards extremity. Silence creates a vacuum. That vacuum is being filled by the loudest and most extreme voices.

Ironically, my inbox tells a different story. Messages of private support arrive regularly from professionals, executives and community leaders who reject polarization and oppose separatism. Yet many of those same individuals will not speak publicly. They calculate the risk and opt out.

That is the tragedy. Democracy does not fail only when bad ideas win. It fails when good people decide not to contest them.

If you believe the political middle ground has served Alberta well, then it must be defended. Not privately. Not passively. Publicly and persistently.

Democracy does not survive timidity. It survives participation.


Bill Whitelaw is a director and advisor to many industry boards, including the Canadian Society for Evolving Energy, which he chairs. He speaks and comments frequently on the subjects of social licence, innovation and technology, and energy supply networks.


© Troy Media

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

Labels

Show more