Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’


How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative?


AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30th), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past.

Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates.

Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end.

Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.

 

For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intrusive government, gradual change rather than radical, advocating for free markets, and fiscal responsibility. From there, the divisions seem endless, as show by just these few:

Progressive conservatives … social conservatives … libertarian conservatives … centre-right conservatism … right of centre conservatives … far-right conservatives … and traditionalists.

So, with this kind of diversity, HOW is it possible to have a narrow definition of who, or what, is a Conservative?

I am the Admin on a political Facebook page, and there has been heated debate on this very topic.  That said, no one yet has defined what it is not be a Conservative.  The most ardent simply say anyone that has at one time been a BC Liberal can NEVER be a Conservative.

On that I call BS!

My question is, ‘How we should be deciding who is conservative enough to be called a Conservative?’


Is it a multiple-choice quiz?

Is it a Yes or No quiz?

Is there some kind of psychological evaluation?

Or this one, which is my favorite question to toss back at those who question anyone’s conservative bona fides:

“Is there a genetic blood test that filters conservatism?”

Here’s the thing, and it’s something anyone that follows BC politics knows – or at least in my opinion -- should know. 

The BC NDP pretty much have a lock on 40 percent of the vote.  While their share of the vote has been decreasing over the past 3 elections, the BC Greens have received, on average, 15% of the vote.

Those two numbers combined equal fifty-five (55) percent.

There CANNOT be any kind of a split on the centre-right, right of centre, or right.  They MUST work together to bring about the defeat of the provincial NDP in the next general election – whenever it may be.

So, my comment to the leadership candidates is this; ‘End the purity test’ and do it today! We are all Conservatives!




UPDATED (01/30/26) – here, in alphabetical order, are the websites of those currently seeking leadership of the Conservative Party of BC:

Warren Hamm – was first to declare but still no website currently available

Stay tuned regarding Bruce Banman – rumoured to be announcing next week


Labels:

Comments

  1. AnonymousJanuary 30, 2026 at 3:13 PM

    As an outsider to Conservative politics my observation is that the BC Liberals WERE the conservative party. And the SoCreds before them.

    The purity tests happen on the left too, but I think at this moment in time right or centrist leaning non-Conservatives look at the culture warriors and hyper partisan nature of the current party and its off shoots and think “we dodged a bullet with that bunch.”

    You cannot govern in BC without captivating the centre, a swath of voters that always lies outside your core base. Insiders of all parties love the purity tests (the federal NDP is going through that now) but those kinds of things are luxuries of opposition. When you govern you become more centrist. That how the Liberals stayed in power for so long and it’s why the NDP are holding on to power now. Being in opposition makes you hyper partisan and that runs the risk of alienating folks who would otherwise hold their nose and out you in government. You need those folks to have power. And you have to govern in a way that at least partially addresses their interests.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...
Post a Comment
Read more

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more