Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

SONIA FURSTENAU – In classrooms we frequently ask students to ‘show your work’ ... government too must show its work in health policy

 


A year ago, in my new role as leader of the BC Greens, I reflected on a vision for the future of the province. I identified four goals I think we should be striving for as a province.

  1. People’s needs are met, and everyone can reach their full potential
  2. We protect the natural systems that we depend on for our health and well-being
  3. Our neighbourhoods and communities are vibrant, safe, and resilient
  4. Our government, political systems, and institutions are trustworthy


In the future, I will discuss these pillars in the context of a range of BC’s policy issues. Today I want to focus on public health and healthcare, something we are all thinking about a lot these days.

Since my last newsletter, the omicron variant has spread so rapidly that for the first time in the pandemic, more than a third of Canadians know someone infected (https://nationalpost.com/health/democratization-of-covid-four-in-10-canadians-know-someone-recently-infected-poll-finds).

Case numbers have escalated to the point that BC’s testing capacity has been overwhelmed, and hospitalizations are rising to new highs, at a time when healthcare workers are falling ill themselves.

COVID-19 has shown all of us how the prevention of illness and disease is critical to the whole foundation of our individual and societal well-being. It has also shown that times of crisis turn the cracks in our institutions into chasms, underscoring the need to build resilient institutions and decision-making processes to adapt to and respond to crises quickly.

It is important to recognize that our healthcare system extends beyond the network of hospitals and clinics and beyond the healthcare professionals who staff them. It includes all of us, and the institutions and communities that connect us.

COVID-19 has shown this clearly: it has meant that the decisions made in homes, in workplaces, in schools, and in our wider communities have implications for the health of others, with severe impacts for the most vulnerable in society.

In the early months of the pandemic, we embraced the call to build back better. Let's not abandon this goal to strive for a healthier, more equitable future. A strong healthcare system will be an essential part of achieving this.

How can we better value and support the healthcare staff upon whom we depend – many of whom are overworked, burnt out, and increasingly subjected to workplace violence?

How do we ensure that our systems are transparent and accountable? These are essential for building and maintaining public trust, especially in the context of misinformation.

In classrooms, we frequently ask students to ‘show your work’ in answering a question. This demonstrates that the answer is justified, that there has been a process, and evidence considered. Government too must show its work in health policy by presenting and describing the evidence used to make decisions, and the intention behind those decisions.

Too often, government decisions are made with minimal transparency and little discussion of the goals. The logic appears to be rooted in a fear of making mistakes: if the public doesn’t know what the goal is, they cannot hold government accountable for missing the mark. But this thinking erodes trust, and it undermines the capacity for public debate and collaboration – processes that make our decisions wiser and more just.

COVID-19 has shifted everyone’s attention, but we must still be asking questions around how we best protect and achieve truly universal healthcare so that we can best protect the health and well-being of people.



Sonia Furstenau ... is the MLA for Cowichan Valley, and Leader of the BC Greens

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more