Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

RAFAEL POSADA -- I’ve decided to be one of the people at the heart of change. Are you?

 


“Apolitical.”

 

That was always my answer when people asked me where I stood politically. For one reason: disappointment.

 

When I taught political science, I asked my students when you think about politics, which words come to mind?

 

Most had negative undertones: division, conflict, deception, power, status. Canadian political parties have been unable to resonate with young people, who—like most of us—care about issues, not parties.

 

Growing up in a family that argued politics over the dinner table, against the common advice, and believed in the importance of policy changes, it was natural for me to study public policy. Yet, I grew disappointed in many politicians and the political arena.

 

Not all, but many politicians have created a rhetoric fueled with animosity, prejudice, and misinformation that has stalled progress. In my opinion, that rhetoric exacerbates discrimination and allows bigotry to prevail.

 

So, does that make politics bad? No, we just need to rebuild how we do politics because being apolitical is not a solution.

 

Politics needs to be about public engagement, representation, and dialogue to make decisions that take us forward. It needs to be about bringing different perspectives, without tolerating intolerance, and creating an environment that embraces our differences and empowers innovation.

 

I think a few things need to happen to accomplish this type of politics. We need to re-envision a more inclusive, collaborative, and compassionate political arena. One that moves away from divisive party politics that prevent us from finding consensus and achieving an equitable, sustainable, and thriving future.

 

We need to build a government that works collaboratively to eliminate the disadvantages that have left many behind, and instead implement equity of opportunity to achieve a fair society. It must not think in short, fixed terms, but acts on the existential socio-economic and environmental threats of our time; one that is founded with innovation, technology, and most importantly, people as the resources with which to build hot-wired economies.

 

This is a call to action for my fellow British Columbians who may feel the same way. Because, as a young voter within the 61 percent of British Columbians who are under 39 years old, I hope to build a life in this province. I care about affordability, sustainability, and productivity, three indicators that can determine my future in B.C.

 

I discovered quickly that apolitical was too easy of a stance to take, I still got to complain about the changes I wanted but it was an excuse to not do anything to create the necessary change.

 

Nobody was more surprised than me when I recently connected with an aspiring politician who, for the first time in a long time, made me hopeful that we can do politics differently in BC.

 

That’s why, I stand with Val Litwin for BC Liberal leadership to take the first step forward and redefine what success looks like for British Columbia. However, this goal goes beyond parties.

 

Let’s demand strong governments and oppositions that hold them accountable.

 

Let’s demand transparency, accountability, and a more collaborative political arena that creates progress on issues we care about.

 

Let’s demand leaders who believe in “action, not words. Impact, not spin,” as Val has said.

 

Let’s demand a fiscally responsible government that makes decisions based on data yet understands how to address the pressing socio-economic and environmental issues of our time.

 

All of that requires serious, decisive action. Val is a doer who understands the connection between people, the environment, and the economy. “Any government that fails to sincerely place people at the heart of what they do is no longer electable,” he has said.

 

Instead, I’ve decided to be one of the people at the heart of change. Are you?

 

 

Rafael Posada … is a young entrepreneur and policy consultant. He is supporting Val Litwin’s BC Liberal leadership campaign.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more