Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

DEVON KRUGGEL: This is what economic war looks like


We, in Canada have been lucky for years with American governments. Our trade disputes have been relatively tiny, small, and minimally harmful over all. To those that did get harmed, it felt like the world was ending. But if you weren't one of those people you probably never thought about it.

Today, we are on notice that almost every Canadian working is now a potential casualty in a trade war started by Donald Trump. About 78% of all our trade goes to the United States. That's about $2 billion a day, every day.

Yes, tariffs will hurt American consumers. No one with a brain is going to dispute that.

They will hurt Canadian workers that rely on trade for their jobs a lot worse in the short and medium term.

A 10% tariff as Trump initially proposed would hurt our economy. A 25% tariff as Trump is now boasting will devastate our economy from coast to coast to coast, all sectors, all professions.

A recession is guaranteed in this scenario and it will likely be long and deep.

How does Canada respond? Well, we can put tariffs on American goods but that would hurt us even more. Our trading relationship with the USA is not symmetrical. We rely on them far more than they rely on us. They have a huge advantage in a trade war.

It is like this. Canada is a small snail on the ground. America is a guy wearing very large boots. We can't beat the US or even bring them to heel in a trade war.

Trump is demanding Canada secure its border with the USA. Note that he's not demanding that America secure its border. He wants us to shoulder the cost. He also wants Canada to crack down on Chinese imports that then go into the US market via our ports. Doug Ford first brought this up in Canada a couple of weeks ago vis a vis Mexico. Mexican authorities are already forcing companies to "buy local" parts instead of using Chinese imports, for example.

If we do what Trump demands will that fix things? Of course not. Trump will never be satisfied. Canada and Mexico will always be enemies in his mind.

Conservatives might say that Pierre Poilievre will better speak to Trump. Yes, that is a possibility. Trump does not like Justin Trudeau at all. That's pretty clear. Hate might be the more appropriate word. But I don't think Poilievre will have much luck with Trump either.

This boils down to the simple fact that fascists always need external and internal enemies to prop up their regimes. Trump cannot make nice with an enemy unless he has a good replacement. He needs the enemy, closer the better, to keep his base in a state of agitation.

What about CUSMA? Don't we have a trade agreement? As the CBC article shows, Trump is all but tearing up an agreement he signed with us. The treaty will be null and void and there's nothing we can do about that.

What about the World Trade Organization or WTO? Can they intervene? The UN and the WTO is a UN body operates through agreements and negotiation. When you have an irrational fascist in one country tearing up agreements it should be clear he won't care what WTO or anyone else says.

Okay, is there any good news? Well, there is a good chance what Trump said yesterday may never happen or not as extreme. Cooler heads in his administration, and there are a few, might get him to scale this stuff back. Congress may intervene as much as they can because they have a lot of members that are in states relying on that stable trade relationship.

I think the best bet on mitigating this impending disaster are American consumer groups. They have huge voice in the US. Americans don't like paying more for the things in life they both need and want. When prices go up, and inflation spikes, Trump and his administration will be facing an epic backlash.

Of course, that might take time.

One thing is certain, 2025 is going to be off to a very bad start

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more