Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Family and Survivors Demand Justice on the Anniversary of Owyn McInnis’ Tragic Death


“It is outrageous that when reckless disregard on our roads leads to the death of innocent university students and severe injuries to others, our laws respond with nothing more than a slap-on-the-wrist and the victims are not compensated for their life shattering injuries. Cases of such gravity demand the scrutiny of a judge and jury- not the discretion of a Crown prosecutor alone.” ~~ John Rustad, Leader of the Conservative Party of BC.

November 29, 2024, Kamloops, BC: On the anniversary of the tragic death of Owyn McInnis, killed in a devastating car crash caused by a driver alleged to have been operating a vehicle without due care and attention, his family and the surviving victims are speaking out to demand justice.

The McInnis family has a very reasonable request; have a judge and jury determine if the driver is guilty of criminal actions in an open court,” said Conservative Party of BC Critic for Finance, Peter Milobar.

His innocence or guilt should not be pre-determined behind closed doors.”

The driver, who faces charges under the Motor Vehicle Act for failing to drive with reasonable consideration for others, faces a maximum penalty of only $2,000 if convicted. For Owyn’s grieving parents and the two survivors of the crash, this penalty feels woefully inadequate in the face of the profound loss and trauma they have endured.

It’s just another example that our justice system is broken,” added Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests.

Considering the amount of evidence produced in this case by the RCMP, common sense would suggest that, at a minimum, criminal charges should have been supported and the accused made to sit in front of a judge and jury. For crown prosecutors to say they require a higher standard in a case such as this is, frankly, insulting to the victims and their families who deserve more from both our legislators and justice system.”

Owyn’s family is calling on the authorities to re-examine the case and pursue charges under the Criminal Code of Canada, where penalties for dangerous driving causing death and injury reflect the seriousness of the consequences. 

The new ICBC “No Fault” system, brought in by David Eby, places remarkably limited responsibility on both the insurer and the offender, while shifting an overwhelming burden onto the victims. Reckless, inattentive driving that causes a fatality and serious injuries must carry serious consequences.” ~~ Brent Chapman, Conservative Party of BC Critic for Transit & ICBC

The Conservative Party of BC is calling on David Eby to amend his failed “No Fault” insurance policies as well as amendments to the justice system to ensure that victims are prioritized over perpetrators. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more