Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

SEAN SMITH: Don’t blow sunshine up my backside; how do you plan to make huge cuts to taxes and still pay for all the things you want to pay for?

 

Regarding "Are Poilievre and the Conservatives headed towards a "loveless landslide"?

The challenge isn’t going to be winning the election, it’s going to be making sure that Canadians don’t regret who they vote for in the election.

I am not buying the BS from the Opposition or the some of the Media, but I am concerned that there seems to still be too much focus on finger pointing, sloganeering, and trying to bring down the government through a non-confidence vote, rather than the building a substantive plan to get the country back on a positive path.

This seepage of US Republican style politicking is not a good look for those of us Small 'c' conservatives.

Regarding that, a friend said to me, "The plan is there" ... however he then asked ... "But is anyone seeking it out?"

I am wondering if there is a plan though.

I have spoken to a number of Conservative Party of Canada candidates about Veterans issues, for example, and still get the sloganeering answers and the “When we are in power” lines.

I am a card-carrying Conservative. You don’t need to blow sunshine up my backside, so tell me what the plan is to support Vets, because all I hear is “We are going to do things different from the Liberals”.

How do you plan to make huge cuts to taxes and still pay for all the things you want to pay for?

Just the revamping of the military is going to be a huge expenditure. If you stop sending money to Ukraine, you had better be prepared to support NATO.

And here are other examples of where the money meets the road.

Northern Development:
"We support strategic investments in nation-building: power, communication, defense, and transportation infrastructure and scientific research and technological innovation to enable Northern solutions to employment, education, health and social challenges." ALL of this costs money and NONE of the Territories have the financial ability to do any of it on their own. Just the transport infrastructure, alone, is an investment of several billion dollars ... so what will we sacrifice in cuts to make any of that happen?

Arctic Sovereignty:
This comes down to a National Defence plan and the willingness of the Canadian Government to re-establish a military presence and foothold in the north. Again, infrastructure money is going to be huge to accomplish this, because it is about more than icebreakers.

Fisheries:
Putting aside things like trade agreements and market development, the need to basically rebuild the Coast Guard to ensure that there are no foreign infringements on our resource territory and that our citizens are not abusing the rules and regulations around harvesting and marine resources, is yet another massive investment.....and our Navy cannot take up that torch.

Immigration:
Nothing more to say here. Cleaning up the free-for-all that has been in place for the last few years will take huge amounts of cash.

RCMP:
Understaffed, overworked, poorly led, hamstrung by a flawed justice system, and in DIRE need of a top-to-bottom overhaul to get it away from the need of constant over-watch because of poor leadership and underfunded training (Recruit Depot in Regina, alone, is in SERIOUS need of repairs and upgrading).

National Defence will take decades to fix. DECADES. Unless we are willing to rebuild our industrial capabilities internally, we will be purchasing the assets for war and defence from other countries ... and that investment is EASILY 10 to 20 times what we are currently spending. And the FIRST thing we have to do is the ONE thing we do not want to do, but have to; pull out of all foreign commitments to focus money and personnel on the rebuilding of our Canadian Armed Forces.

You can accomplish savings on better government financial management, implementing austerity measures, and eliminating non-essential program expenditures. Rather than "axing the tax", make better use of it. Make it the revenue-neutral tax that it was supposed to be and invest it into the infrastructure and development that it was supposed to be invested in.

Perhaps it is naive, but I REALLY want to see a party put the country before their own personal power, and layout an entire plan. If their government runs with it, it was still their plan and the country benefits.

Right now, all I am seeing is “I want power”, and the country comes second.



Sean Smith is a 15-year Canadian Armed Forces Veteran (with UN and NATO service) and is in the Royal Canadian Air Force Reserves (CIC) working with the Cadets Canada program. He is the Business Development Specialist for a Vancouver Island based Security company and has been in the Security Industry for over 16 years. A born and raised British Columbian, Sean is married and has 2 grown sons.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more