Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

KRUGGEL: Disgusting but there is some good news here


 
A good political scientist is also, at the very least, a bit of an historian.

Alberta, like the rest of the western world, had not had gay rights in the mainstream for the vast majority of its history. Then in 1997 the Vriend Case was decided at the Supreme Court stating that a Catholic School Board was legally wrong to fire a teacher for the sole reason he was a homosexual. In other words, one's religion didn't trump another person's Charter rights.

This set off a firestorm of debate across the province. Premier Ralph Klein vowed at one point to use the Charter's Notwithstanding Clause, to stand up to the Courts pushing their wildly anti-family agenda. Many Alberta politicians were furious at the ruling. Many Albertans were disgusted and they let it be known.

That was in 1997.

Alberta has always been a socially backwards province. It is a province of three major cities: Grand Prairie, Edmonton, and Calgary and a pile of small towns and other smaller cities. These people have long tied their identity to working the soil and the land in farming, forestry, mining, and of course oil extraction.

My home town is in Northern Alberta. I spent many years of my early life there. I went back in 1997, the time of the Vriend Ruling for a job. By chance, I was back in my hometown. The place had not changed in the 10 years since my last visit. There were two new buildings. That was it. Everything else was as if the town were frozen in time.

That's what rural and small town Alberta has been like for generations: static and insular.

Barrhead follows in the footsteps of Westlock in banning the town from endorsing things like gay pride or any group. They claim they are doing this because a town government should be neutral.

Any student of history knows neutrality favors an oppressor.

Look, I am not surprised that these towns did vote in favor of banning rainbow flags and crosswalks. Oh, private citizens can fly any flag they want and they can paint any part of their property as they see fit. The ban only applies to public properties.

It is the vote totals that tell the important story. In 1997 or even 2007 these votes would have been 95-98% in favor of banning pride flags and crosswalks.

The pro-ban side managed 57% of the vote in Barrhead, and far less in Westlock though it was just over 50%. That is a majority. It is not a 98% majority nor even a 2/3rds majority.

While this issue shows the worst of Alberta it also shows the demographic transformation of the province. Alberta and Albertans are becoming more and more progressive. Leaders like Danielle Smith can stoke the flames of hate and intolerance but can they really? And for how long?

In less than 30 years Alberta has fundamentally changed. What will it look like 30 years from now? I suspect, 30 years from now, the last remnants of social conservatism will be on their collective deathbeds bemoaning the fall of western civilization or some rambling version of that.

As social conservatism recedes, albeit slowly, in Alberta we know that for the rest of Canada - social conservatism is a dead end ideology today.

To that I say, good riddance. We don't need social conservatism and the vast majority of us don't want it.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Conservative Economic Team Responds to Urgent Industry Concerns

 " For far too long, the BC NDP has ignored the economic challenges facing British Columbians. Manufacturing jobs are vanishing, forestry is in decline, and private sector employment growth has stagnated. Meanwhile, affordability has worsened for both families and businesses. British Columbians deserve better, and we’re here to deliver real solutions to rebuild our economy and create jobs that support everyday working people and their families ." – Gavin Dew, MLA and Shadow Minister for Jobs, Economy, Development, and Innovation.   December 3, 2024, Vancouver, BC – The Conservative economic team met today with business leaders and stakeholders to tackle critical issues impacting British Columbia’s economy. Attended by 9 critics from the Conservative Caucus, this meeting was convened by MLA Gavin Dew – Shadow Minister for Jobs, Economic Development, and Innovation - as a direct response to an October 30th open letter from seven of the province’s largest industry associations. ...

WARD STAMER -- We need certainly in our markets, and certainly in our fibre supply, before we no longer have a forest industry in this province

Image Government of BC I think we all realize that the threat of Trump’s 25% tariff is like other provocative statements he’s made in the past. That said, we should have reason to be concerned. Tariffs don’t benefit anyone. A tariff of that magnitude – included on our own softwood lumber exports, will make things more expensive for Americans, and cause friction in the supply chain. If imposed, a twenty-five percent tariff will be equally detrimental to the citizens and economy of the United States, as well as the people of BC. There are two things, however, of equal concern to the threat of punitive tariffs by incoming U.S. President-elect Donald Trump. One is our antiquated stumpage fees. It is a legacy from decades ago, and one incapable of responding to changing market conditions. We need to revamp our stumpage system to better reflect market conditions, and our economic costs. Instead, a value-added tax system will be instantly responsive to current market conditions and will encou...

FORSETH: Are the homeless less deserving than a single mom, or any low-income individual? No, or course not.

A story by Levi Landry , just the other day in InfoNews, stated: A former Kamloops RV dealership on the North Shore is poised to spend the next two years as a homeless shelter ...  ... BC Housing plans to open the 44-bed shelter in late-December. With a total $6.1 million budget, that's $138,636 per bed for 20 months. Okay, at first glance ensuring the homeless have somewhere safe, and providing for their needs, seems like a good idea.  NOT, however, when you start crunching the numbers! To start with, the proposal is for 20 months, not 2 years, although there is an option to extend it. Let’s stick with the 20 months though because that is what’s been agreed to. Averaging the total $6.1 million budget over that 20-month time frame works out to $305,000/month. That’s a monthly cost of $6,931.82 for each of the 44 people who will be housed and cared for. Compare that to BC's average monthly mortgage payment -- for an entire house -- of $2,913. Compare that to the rent for a 2-b...

Labels

Show more