Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

KRUGGEL – Is it any wonder why the Liberals are falling further and further behind in the polls. Bad policy doesn't sell.

Everyone agrees that we should keep firearms out of the hands of criminals.


The Federal Liberals though have been at the forefront of making bad decisions on firearms for years. It has been an issue for them that has always cost them votes, and over time, government.

The latest move was triggered by the mass shooting in Nova Scotia in May 2020. The shooter's firearms were all illegally acquired in the United States. He illegally brought them over the border by smuggling them across. He was banned from having a firearms license. He purchased an RCMP car and had it repainted to look current. On three separate occasions the RCMP were made aware of the fact he had illegal firearms and had issued threats to people.

No action was ever taken.

He broke law repeatedly before engaging in Canada's worst shooting rampage.

For this, the Federal Liberal Party of Canada has spent the last four years punishing and persecuting lawful firearms owners.

I am a firearms owner as are 2.35 million other Canadians. We are vetted repeatedly with detailed background checks. We have to follow very strict regulations derived from the Firearms Act. We sign away our privacy to the RCMP to be in compliance. We hold the title of being the demographic least likely to commit any crime.

Yet, the Federal Liberals as the government of Canada have continued to come after us constantly.

Today the Federal Liberals have listed around 350 new firearms, long guns, to be classified as prohibited. These are called "assault -styled" weapons because they look like something you'd see in a movie or violent television program.

They are so rarely used in crimes that they don't show up in the official statistics.

In fact, the vast, vast, vast majority of firearms used in crimes are handguns which are still classified as restricted.

Crimes with handguns have increased substantially under Justin Trudeau's terms in office. Yet, since May 2020 no one in Canada has been able to buy or transfer a handgun to a new owner. Stores aren't allowed to carry them. You cannot buy them online. You cannot order them from the United States or any country.

Handguns used in crimes have skyrocketed. They enter the country illegally along the US border and through our ports. Chinese made 1911 knock-offs are common in this country. They used to be sold legally. Today they come in through Vancouver and elsewhere along the BC coast. There is simply insufficient resources currently patrolling the coast and inspecting containers being offloaded at ships.

Handguns also, as we all know, flow across our border with the United States. They are brought in by various gangs and other criminal operations for use but said groups in this country.

The number of illegal weapons entering this country has not slowed under the Liberal government. It has accelerated.

So today the Liberals are targeting long guns, not handguns, and continue their assault on lawful owners.

Is it any wonder why the Liberals are falling further and further behind in the polls. Bad policy doesn't sell.



ABOUT DEVON KRUGGEL:
I'm a 50-year-old Caucasian male and was a right winger of sorts from the age of 16 until I was about 47 or so. I have got a degree in History and Political Science and one in Computer Science. Bachelors. I've been in BC since 1990, and have lived on Vancouver Island since 1993


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more