Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FAIR VOTE CANADA - BC NDP and BC Green Party Accord includes a committee that will look at proportional representation!


The new "Cooperation and Responsible Government Accord" between the BC NDP and the BC Greens includes a special all-party committee that will look at proportional representation!

The committee will hear from experts and the public and produce a report on preferred methods of proportional representation for BC in the summer of 2025.

But that might not be the end of the story...

The Accord between the BC NDP and the BC Greens will be up for renewal annually. Every year, the parties will negotiate "renewed and new policy initiatives". 

The special committee could be a first step to kick-start a conversation that leads to a real agreement for proportional representation in British Columbia. 

As we look at democracies that use proportional representation in the OECD, in almost every case, proportional representation came from a multi-party agreement.

Parties who were serious about building a fair, inclusive and cooperative democracy became willing to negotiate and compromise to make it happen. 

Real action on proportional representation can't come soon enough. The last first-past-the-post election in BC left the province more polarized than ever.

Voters were robbed of choice when BC United (formerly the BC Liberals) folded overnight in order to back the BC Conservatives. 

This drastic decision, with far-reaching consequences, only happened because of the cut-throat incentives of a winner-take-all system.

In the long run, moving closer to a two-party system could take politics down a dangerous path of division and alienation.

On the outcomes that matter most to our lives—health, the economy and the environment—countries with proportional representation have been proven to outperform countries with winner-take-all systems.

The cooperation deal between the BC NDP and BC Greens has opened up a new opportunity for a fairer voting system in BC.


Anita Nickerson
Executive Director, Fair Vote Canada

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more