Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

KRUGGEL: The Story that should not be a story: The BC Conservatives squabble


In November a woman named Comfort Sakoma-Fadugba, the co-chair of the Vancouver Police Board, was asked to resign over social media posts she had made. She apologized for her posts and resigned.

First up, let's be clear: her posts did violate the Code of Conduct she agreed to when she accepted a seat on the board. Public officials on these kinds of boards cannot ever show cultural, religious, etc preference. They must at all times appear to be neutral to fulfill their roles - just like judges.

She resigned and that should have been the end of the story.

Elenore Sturko, the newly re-elected MLA, now sitting as a BC Conservative, publicly agreed with this resignation. She serves as the Public Safety critic so, this is part of her job to comment on things like this.

That should have been the end of the story, but 13 BC Conservative MLAs wrote a letter taking issue with Sturko. They claimed Comfort was a victim of cancel culture, mused about values, etc. Sturko is not a woman to be bullied, especially by her own caucus members and promptly stood her ground.

Thankfully, the BC Conservatives are led by a leader
that actually gets it right when he needs too.

 
The 13 demanded that leader John Rustad do something about Sturko. He did not. He did suggest she meet with Comfort Sakoma-Fadugba. Sturko declined.

That's what happened, and this should never have been a story for two solid reasons,

The first reason is that the Comfort Sakoma-Fadugba crossed the line. She wasn't the victim. Her resignation was a reasonable consequence for her actions.

Second, the real story, that the BC Conservatives should be solely focused on, is the lack of a fall sitting of the Legislature. All those NDP promises? Where are they? David Eby isn't advancing any of his agenda right now. He did sign a new partnership with the Green Party of BC to win the support of its two lone MLAs.

Third, the BC Conservatives are mostly a caucus of rookie MLAs that feel bold simply because they got elected. Someone needs to remind them that all they did was take a large NDP majority government and make it a slim NDP majority government. Feeling bold and important is a great way for a rookie to make rookie mistakes.

The big rookie mistake here is that 13 Conservative MLAs put their backwards thinking down on paper, and signed their names. Of course that letter got loose. You don't need to be an experienced politician to know that letters always get leaked to the public. The other rookie mistake is to think your fellow MLA that lives in the Lower Mainland has gauged the public opinion incorrectly than you, a guy not living there. These MLAs make their own party squabbles the story. The NDP got the heat taken off of them.

That folks is just plain dumb.

Thankfully, the BC Conservatives are led by a leader that actually gets it right when he needs too. Rustad was asked about how he would deal with Sturko. His answer was perfect: we don't whip our members. Whip being the term used for ordering members to do or say something or be threatened with expulsion from caucus. In other words, she's free to take her position and the party will abide by it. Bomb diffused.

Going forward the BC Conservatives need to understand that Sturko is the one that'll get them seats in the Lower Mainland that they lost by ultra slim margins. Those 13 won't. She understands that you cannot be a social conservative and win in many parts of this province.

British Columbia is a racially, ethnically, religiously, and culturally diverse province. You cannot ever take a position where you, especially if you're in government, show favoritism to one race, ethnicity, religion, or culture. You cannot be uttering phrases like cancel culture or woke. Sure, that may fly in some parts of the interior or north but not in the Lower Mainland and Vancouver Island where the bulk of the province's seats sit.

Conservatives need to understand that they are strongest when they talk economics, finances, jobs, and stuff like that. Conversely, they are at their weakest when they dip their toes into social politics.

If they want an issue to get angry about let it be about this; "Where is our fall sitting of the Legislature!?"

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more