Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FORSETH -- To be honest, I was not surprised by anything the President of Stingray Radio, Steve Jones, had to say


Today, after many weeks of back and forth emails with the Canadian Radio and Television Commission (CRTC), and their request for the owners of Radio 610 CHNL in Kamloops to respond to my concerns (which I outlined HERE), I received a response from Steve Jones, President of Stingray Radio.

To be honest, I was not surprised by anything he had to say. Further, it only backed up my belief that they, and other media conglomerates, have (and will continue to) decimate local radio.

Take for example, this comment from him:
As an AM undertaking, CHNL is not required to broadcast any local programming specifically.

I don’t know about you, however I don’t believe that’s anything to be proud of. In fact, any of the large broadcast companies (Bell, Corus, Stingray, and others) should be ashamed to make that statement.

He then goes on to say:
Despite having no regulatory obligation to do so, CHNL maintains a local newsroom staffed by three people and provides hourly news updates throughout the broadcast day.

A radio station operates 7 days a week, and they’re going to cover the news with just two people?

Those two, Jeff Andreas and Paul James, are doing a herculean job as far as I am concerned. The third person, referenced by Jones, would have to be sports reporter Jon Keen (whose work is done in partnership with the Kamloops Blazers -- InfoNews Sept 24).

I spent some time this afternoon on the CHNL website looking at posted news and sports stories going back all the way to October 31st – Jon Keen is there on just one from December 4th, with regards to the Kamloops United Football Club … that’s it.

So tell me Mr. Jones … is there in reality a three person news room?


Stingray Radio President Steve Jones goes on to say, “Ultimately, this fall we made the difficult decision to streamline our operations so that CHNL could avoid the fate of the stations noted above. Thanks to these programming changes, we hope to keep CHNL on the air and a vibrant part of the Kamloops community for many years to come.”

I have to again ask though, given this, to whose benefit is it keeping CHNL on the air?

Again I reiterate that all programing other than news, and Kamloops Blazer’s play-by-play, originates from outside our community.  The music aired on CHNL is pretty much found on other stations, and there is little to no information of happenings in our community, or within the region.

Over the years, the station shut down repeaters in the North Thompson, Merritt, and Ashcroft/ Cache Creek – I suspect the one in the Shuswap won’t be far behind.

Given all that, really the only benefit to anyone, that I can see, is to Stingray alone as they can now operate a radio station with virtually no staff other than 2 news people.

Stingray Radio may as well just shutter CHNL and shift those 2 news people over to Country 103 and K97.5 … and then pick one of the two to air Blazers games.

Do I want to see that happen?

NO, of course not!

What I do want to see is for the CRTC to obligate ALL radio stations (whether AM or FM) to provide local programming, because as I stated on December 4th:

“ … without a strong local presence, there is NO reason for anyone to tune in to local(?) radio, and audiences will continue to decline as the final nails are pounded into the coffin.”

To be honest, I have no real hope this is going to happen, and so one way or the other the likes of Stingray, Corus, Bell and other will simply continue to turn off the lights at one radio station after the other …

… and that is sad.

In Kamloops, I’m Alan Forseth.


Comments

  1. "...a vibrant part of the Kamloops community for many years to come."

    Uh huh. Interesting definition of "vibrant".

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more