Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

DAN ALBAS: GST holiday "ill considered, decidedly unserious policy"


It appears contradictory to promote a temporary GST exemption on candy, while opposing a policy that would make new housing more affordable.

We are just days away from December 14, 2024—the day when the Trudeau Liberals' temporary expansion of select GST-exempt items is scheduled to take effect.
I mention this because Bill C-78, which enables the temporary expansion of GST-exempt items from December 14 to February 14, still needs to pass in the Canadian Senate.
Does this mean the GST “holiday” will be delayed? While technically this is possible, despite the Prime Minister’s claims to have appointed “independent” Senators, I expect this Bill to be passed and to receive royal assent in time to meet the Liberal governments politically selected timeline.
Regarding GST exemptions, the House voted this week on the Conservative plan to permanently exempt new homes under $1 million from GST. This tax policy would save Canadians up to $50,000 on the price of a new home and is estimated to stimulate the construction of 30,000 additional homes and apartments annually across Canada.
Most surprisingly, the Trudeau Liberal government voted against this measure. As noted by many experts and stakeholders, it appears contradictory to promote a temporary GST exemption on items like junk food, candy, select alcohol, and video gaming systems while opposing a policy that would make new housing more affordable.
It is understandable why during its review of the bill, some Senators said that they found the Liberals' temporary GST exemption policy to be both "ill-considered" and "decidedly unserious."
Next week will be the final sitting week for the House of Commons before its winter break. On Tuesday, the Trudeau Liberal government will present the long-delayed Fall Economic Statement (FES), which will provide Canadians with a clearer picture of the country's current federal fiscal position.
The Fall Economic Statement will also provide an opportunity for the Liberal government to outline its future spending priorities. I am particularly interested in its projections, given the Prime Minister's promise to NATO allies to meet the 2% of GDP target by 2032. Further complicating this fiscal picture is his government's reliance on the NDP to maintain power. The recent credit downgrade of British Columbia from its triple-A rating demonstrates the risks of mismatched deficit spending and revenue.
Recent leaks to the media suggest this dynamic between deficits and revenue may explain rising tensions between the Prime Minister and his finance minister over the Liberal Government’s "Working Canadians Rebate"—a proposed $250 payment planned for early spring 2025. This rebate would be distributed to 18.7 million Canadians who worked in 2023 and earned individual net incomes up to $150,000.
The reporting indicates finance officials consider both the GST break and $250 cheque pledge "fiscally unwise," while the Prime Minister's office views these as important "politically strategic spending measures."
My question this week: Do you support the Trudeau government's proposal to send $250 cheques to 18.7 million working Canadians who earned up to $150,000 in individual net income during 2023? Why or why not?
I can be reached at Dan.Albas@parl.gc.ca or call toll-free 1-800-665-8711.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2027: After a Decade of Decline, NDP Budget Delivers an Assault on Seniors, Working Families, and Small Businesses

Peter Milobar, BC Conservative Finance Critic, condemned the NDP government’s latest budget as the result of a decade of decline that has left British Columbians broke, unsafe, and paying more for less.   “After ten years of NDP mismanagement, this budget is an assault on seniors, working families, and the small businesses that drive our economy,” said Milobar. “The NDP have turned their back on the people working hardest to make ends meet and the seniors who built this province.” Milobar pointed to a new $1.1 billion annual income tax increase and warned that the government is piling new costs onto households already struggling with affordability.   “This government keeps asking British Columbians for more, while delivering less,” Milobar said. “The question people are asking is simple: Where has all the money gone?” Milobar noted that BC has gone from a surplus in the first year of NDP government to a projected deficit of more than $13 billion this year, while prov...
Post a Comment
Read more

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more