Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

TROY MEDIA: How Trudeau's GST/HST tax break turned into a holiday turkey


Retailers and consumers blindsided by Ottawa’s chaotic GST/HST tax break rollout ~~ Sylvain Charlebois


T’was the week before Christmas, and all through the malls, many creatures were stirring ...

Consumers and retailers are scrambling to understand the GST/HST holiday chaos. With Bill C-78 granting Canadians a temporary tax reprieve receiving royal assent mere days before its implementation on Dec. 14, businesses were faced with an almost impossible task: recoding systems during the busiest shopping season of the year. While some major food retailers had anticipated the bill’s passage and prepared in advance, others were caught off guard or distanced themselves entirely from the initiative.

What was supposed to bring holiday cheer has instead become a tax policy nightmare.

The confusion started early. On Dec. 10, PepsiCo announced it would not participate, informing its partners – Loblaw, Sobeys, and Metro – that it would continue charging taxes due to the complexity of its systems. PepsiCo wasn’t alone; other manufacturers reportedly followed suit. By the eve of Dec. 14, Ottawa confirmed that participation in the GST/HST holiday would be voluntary, with no enforcement mechanism or penalties for non-compliance. What could have been a straightforward consumer benefit instead created an uneven playing field, leaving businesses and shoppers frustrated.

For retailers opting out, the stakes are high. In provinces where the GST/HST rate is as high as 15 per cent, not participating could mean a significant competitive disadvantage. Larger chains with the resources to adapt quickly are likely to benefit, while smaller, independent grocers – already struggling with tight margins – may lose customers.

The experience is no less chaotic for consumers. Many shoppers don’t know which stores are participating and often discover the answer only at the checkout counter. Stories of long lines and disappointed customers spread quickly, and some vow to avoid non-participating retailers altogether, whether for economic or even political reasons.

Adding another layer of complexity are retailers pledging to donate collected taxes to charity. While noble in intent, these efforts only underscore the holiday’s haphazard rollout, making the GST/HST holiday feel less like a gift and more like an awkward misstep. One shopper quipped, “I just want to know if I’m saving money – not solve a puzzle every time I go to the store.”

Ottawa billed the tax holiday as a festive measure to provide relief to Canadians, but anyone familiar with fiscal policy knows better. The rushed, temporary, and optional initiative has introduced unnecessary complexity into Canada’s food retail system at a time when simplicity and certainty are desperately needed. In the weeks ahead, consumers will likely question receipts, demand refunds, and flood government hotlines for answers.

Meanwhile, retailers face rising operational costs, eroded confidence, and the risk of losing already scarce customers. For businesses weighing their options, this fiasco only reinforces Canada’s reputation as a challenging place to do business.
Restaurants, fortunately, have been spared much of this confusion, as their operations remain relatively straightforward under the new policy. But for grocers and food retailers, the holiday adds pressure to an already stressful time of year.

A hidden consequence of this policy could be opportunity pricing. With retail taxes temporarily removed, some businesses may quietly raise prices to account for operational disruptions. Items like coffee, cocoa, and baked goods could see noticeable price increases, hidden until the holiday ends in February. Consumers may be left facing higher costs long after the festive season fades, adding insult to injury.

What began as a political gimmick has instead revealed the pitfalls of poor policy-making. Rather than launching a temporary and voluntary tax break during the busiest retail period, Ottawa could have focused on meaningful, permanent reforms to stabilize retail prices and protect Canadians from market volatility. By introducing such a disruptive initiative in the middle of the holiday season, the government has highlighted its mismanagement rather than its generosity.

Ultimately, this tax holiday is shaping up to be a lump of coal in Canada’s economic stocking. Consumers are confused, retailers are frustrated, and the policy’s temporary nature ensures its benefits will be short-lived at best.

As Canadians muddle through the holiday season, one thing is certain: the GST/HST holiday is a case study of how not to deliver fiscal relief.


Dr. Sylvain Charlebois is a Canadian professor and researcher who specializes in food distribution and policy. He is the senior director of the Agri-Food Analytics Lab at Dalhousie University and co-host of The Food Professor Podcast. The media frequently cites him for his insights on food prices, agricultural trends, and the global food supply chain.


© Troy Media

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BC’s Forestry Decline Is a Policy Failure, Not a Market Reality -- Forestry Critic Calls for Accountability and Urgent Policy Reset

Conservative Party of BC Forestry Critic, and Kamloops - North Thompson MLA,  Ward Stamer As the Truck Loggers Association convention begins today, BC Conservative Forestry Critic Ward Stamer says British Columbia’s forestry crisis is the result of government mismanagement, not market forces, and that an urgent policy reset is needed to restore certainty, sustainability, and accountability. “For generations, forestry supported families and communities across BC,” said Stamer.  “Today, mills are closing, contractors are parking equipment, and families are being forced to leave home, not because the resource is gone, but because policy has failed.” Government data shows timber shipment values dropped by more than half a billion dollars in the past year, with harvest levels falling by roughly 50 per cent in just four years. At the same time, prolonged permitting timelines, unreliable fibre access, outdated forest inventories, and rising costs have made long-term planning impossib...

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Eby government signs another land-use agreement, as they say one thing and do another, during DRIPA chaos

While promising to fix DRIPA, the Eby government continues to quietly sign binding land-use agreements that fundamentally alter how Crown land is governed in British Columbia. On January 15, 2026, the government signed four ministerial orders advancing the Gwa’ni Land Use Planning Project with the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, amending the Vancouver Island Land Use Plan and changing how more than 166,000 hectares of Crown land can be accessed, developed, and managed. “This is Land Act reform by stealth,” said Critic for Indigenous Relations Scott McInnis. “British Columbians already rejected these changes once. In 2024, public backlash forced the NDP to pull its Land Act amendments. Instead of listening, this government has gone underground, signing individual deals behind closed doors, just like we’ve already seen in places such as Squamish, Teẑtan Biny, and across Northwest BC.” “The Premier admits DRIPA ( the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act) is creating ...

Labels

Show more