Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

TROY MEDIA: How Trudeau's GST/HST tax break turned into a holiday turkey


Retailers and consumers blindsided by Ottawa’s chaotic GST/HST tax break rollout ~~ Sylvain Charlebois


T’was the week before Christmas, and all through the malls, many creatures were stirring ...

Consumers and retailers are scrambling to understand the GST/HST holiday chaos. With Bill C-78 granting Canadians a temporary tax reprieve receiving royal assent mere days before its implementation on Dec. 14, businesses were faced with an almost impossible task: recoding systems during the busiest shopping season of the year. While some major food retailers had anticipated the bill’s passage and prepared in advance, others were caught off guard or distanced themselves entirely from the initiative.

What was supposed to bring holiday cheer has instead become a tax policy nightmare.

The confusion started early. On Dec. 10, PepsiCo announced it would not participate, informing its partners – Loblaw, Sobeys, and Metro – that it would continue charging taxes due to the complexity of its systems. PepsiCo wasn’t alone; other manufacturers reportedly followed suit. By the eve of Dec. 14, Ottawa confirmed that participation in the GST/HST holiday would be voluntary, with no enforcement mechanism or penalties for non-compliance. What could have been a straightforward consumer benefit instead created an uneven playing field, leaving businesses and shoppers frustrated.

For retailers opting out, the stakes are high. In provinces where the GST/HST rate is as high as 15 per cent, not participating could mean a significant competitive disadvantage. Larger chains with the resources to adapt quickly are likely to benefit, while smaller, independent grocers – already struggling with tight margins – may lose customers.

The experience is no less chaotic for consumers. Many shoppers don’t know which stores are participating and often discover the answer only at the checkout counter. Stories of long lines and disappointed customers spread quickly, and some vow to avoid non-participating retailers altogether, whether for economic or even political reasons.

Adding another layer of complexity are retailers pledging to donate collected taxes to charity. While noble in intent, these efforts only underscore the holiday’s haphazard rollout, making the GST/HST holiday feel less like a gift and more like an awkward misstep. One shopper quipped, “I just want to know if I’m saving money – not solve a puzzle every time I go to the store.”

Ottawa billed the tax holiday as a festive measure to provide relief to Canadians, but anyone familiar with fiscal policy knows better. The rushed, temporary, and optional initiative has introduced unnecessary complexity into Canada’s food retail system at a time when simplicity and certainty are desperately needed. In the weeks ahead, consumers will likely question receipts, demand refunds, and flood government hotlines for answers.

Meanwhile, retailers face rising operational costs, eroded confidence, and the risk of losing already scarce customers. For businesses weighing their options, this fiasco only reinforces Canada’s reputation as a challenging place to do business.
Restaurants, fortunately, have been spared much of this confusion, as their operations remain relatively straightforward under the new policy. But for grocers and food retailers, the holiday adds pressure to an already stressful time of year.

A hidden consequence of this policy could be opportunity pricing. With retail taxes temporarily removed, some businesses may quietly raise prices to account for operational disruptions. Items like coffee, cocoa, and baked goods could see noticeable price increases, hidden until the holiday ends in February. Consumers may be left facing higher costs long after the festive season fades, adding insult to injury.

What began as a political gimmick has instead revealed the pitfalls of poor policy-making. Rather than launching a temporary and voluntary tax break during the busiest retail period, Ottawa could have focused on meaningful, permanent reforms to stabilize retail prices and protect Canadians from market volatility. By introducing such a disruptive initiative in the middle of the holiday season, the government has highlighted its mismanagement rather than its generosity.

Ultimately, this tax holiday is shaping up to be a lump of coal in Canada’s economic stocking. Consumers are confused, retailers are frustrated, and the policy’s temporary nature ensures its benefits will be short-lived at best.

As Canadians muddle through the holiday season, one thing is certain: the GST/HST holiday is a case study of how not to deliver fiscal relief.


Dr. Sylvain Charlebois is a Canadian professor and researcher who specializes in food distribution and policy. He is the senior director of the Agri-Food Analytics Lab at Dalhousie University and co-host of The Food Professor Podcast. The media frequently cites him for his insights on food prices, agricultural trends, and the global food supply chain.


© Troy Media

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH: Without a strong local presence, there is NO reason for anyone to tune in to local(?) radio

LOCAL HOMETOWN RADIO IS DYING … and without serious measures put in place, it will likely never see the light of day again. For well over four decades, the Canadian Radio and Television Commission (CRTC) has presided over its’ demise, and for that I say, “Shame”. Without out a word to say enough was enough, the CRTC has allowed corporate Canada to buy up one radio station after the other, and then allowed them to slash staff to the point where some so-called local radio stations do nothing more than air programming that originates from communities well outside the region in which they are located. Case in point?   On CHNL* 610 in Kamloops, the morning show hosted by Vinnie and Randi, DOES NOT originate from Kamloops -- it doesn’t even originate here in BC. It’s a program that Stingray airs across multiple radio stations in Western Canada. It doesn’t end there. Not only are Vinnie and Rando doing mornings on CHNL, but they also show up on sister station Country 103 … and of course o...

Conservative Economic Team Responds to Urgent Industry Concerns

 " For far too long, the BC NDP has ignored the economic challenges facing British Columbians. Manufacturing jobs are vanishing, forestry is in decline, and private sector employment growth has stagnated. Meanwhile, affordability has worsened for both families and businesses. British Columbians deserve better, and we’re here to deliver real solutions to rebuild our economy and create jobs that support everyday working people and their families ." – Gavin Dew, MLA and Shadow Minister for Jobs, Economy, Development, and Innovation.   December 3, 2024, Vancouver, BC – The Conservative economic team met today with business leaders and stakeholders to tackle critical issues impacting British Columbia’s economy. Attended by 9 critics from the Conservative Caucus, this meeting was convened by MLA Gavin Dew – Shadow Minister for Jobs, Economic Development, and Innovation - as a direct response to an October 30th open letter from seven of the province’s largest industry associations. ...

WARD STAMER -- We need certainly in our markets, and certainly in our fibre supply, before we no longer have a forest industry in this province

Image Government of BC I think we all realize that the threat of Trump’s 25% tariff is like other provocative statements he’s made in the past. That said, we should have reason to be concerned. Tariffs don’t benefit anyone. A tariff of that magnitude – included on our own softwood lumber exports, will make things more expensive for Americans, and cause friction in the supply chain. If imposed, a twenty-five percent tariff will be equally detrimental to the citizens and economy of the United States, as well as the people of BC. There are two things, however, of equal concern to the threat of punitive tariffs by incoming U.S. President-elect Donald Trump. One is our antiquated stumpage fees. It is a legacy from decades ago, and one incapable of responding to changing market conditions. We need to revamp our stumpage system to better reflect market conditions, and our economic costs. Instead, a value-added tax system will be instantly responsive to current market conditions and will encou...

Labels

Show more