Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

KRUGGEL: That Liberal Leadership Race: Yeah, that actually was boring


Over my life, I have seen many leadership races by provincial and Federal parties. Sometimes they are very interesting as candidates fight tooth and nail for the position. Kim Campbell v. Jean Charest was one that comes to mind. Jean Chretien's win in 1990 also came to mind.

Those were great races.

Most races are still very interesting even if they aren't terribly exciting. There are defining moments, great quotes, and ideas are shared that differentiate the candidates.

Then there are races that are truly boring. Little is said. There are no surprise moments. The front running is a shoe in. Worst, no one fights for the job like it matters.

That was the recent Liberal leadership race. It was, perhaps, the most bland, boring political affair I've witnessed at the Federal level in my life.

This was a leadership race that went on for six weeks and resulted in a foregone conclusion. Most predictions were that Mark Carney would win on the first ballot. He did in a blow out.

He did it on his name alone.

That's the boring part of this race. Carney never once gave us any concrete ideas other than ax the Carbon Tax, and rescind the capital gains tax changes. He left everything else vague. In fact, he was so vague that he made Pierre Poilievre looks positively intricate with his detailed policies.

His competition were far more detailed. What they didn't do was call him on his lack of details In fact, other than a couple of very soft jabs during the English language debate by Gould, Carney skated up to an open net, and nudged the puck over the line.

I have to ask, other than fulfilling the Liberal Party rules for leadership changes, what was the point in having the other three candidates waste almost $2 million collectively on this farce of a race?

Look, if you're coming to me asking for a donation to run in a leadership race and expect me to put out some serious cash then I expect you to fight like Hell to win that race.

That is what happened here. Frank Baylis, Chrystia Freeland, and Karina Gould raised about $2 million, collectively, from donors to get them through the race. That's a lot of money. Then the three of them waged the saddest excuse for a contest $2 million can buy.

They didn't fight for the job. They asked people to support them. Politely.

Sure, polite is good. But if you're going to go for the top job you have to fight like you're going for the top job. You can't just assume you'll get it. You cannot just feel you're entitled to it. You have to fight for it, tear down your opponents as required, and tell the nation why you must be the leader because only you can do that job.

You have to prove to the nation that you are capable when the gloves come off. The end result was a boring race and a leader that was never tested.

That begs the question: "Did the Liberals pick a guy that will deliver?"

They don't know. That might be a huge problem later.


ABOUT DEVON KRUGGEL: I'm a 51-year-old Caucasian male and was a right winger of sorts from the age of 16 until I was about 47 or so. I have got a degree in History and Political Science and one in Computer Science. Bachelors. I've been in BC since 1990, and have lived on Vancouver Island since 1993.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more