Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: Our negotiators are juggling hand grenades, with the pins pulled, primarily because they are immune from the effects of an explosion


Freeland postpones UN speech today amid NAFTA talks and looming deadline …  was set to speak today but traded General Assembly spot for Monday 
Elise von Scheel  ~~ CBC News  ~~  Sep 29, 2018

Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland
Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland's speech to the UN General Assembly in New York City today (Sept 29th) will now take place Monday due to NAFTA talks, and officials say there is a strong possibility someone else might have to deliver the remarks on Canada's behalf.

Freeland, who is in the throes of a last-stage effort to secure a North American free trade deal, traded her time slot on the UN rostrum, according to officials in the minister's office. 
Officials told CBC News that the postponement of her speech was due to the trade negotiations, which sources say intensified this week …

As of Saturday morning, the minister was still in Canada. Sources with direct knowledge of the talks told CBC News that David MacNaughton, Canada's ambassador to the U.S., had flown to Ottawa to be part of the concentrated Canadian effort. 

The text of the existing US - Mexico deal is expected to be published by Sunday, and there have been fears that Congress would be willing to press ahead with the bilateral agreement if Canada can't get a deal done.



The misinformation from our government, and from the media, is disgusting ...


“Freeland, who is in the throes of a last-stage effort to secure a North American free trade deal, traded her time slot on the UN rostrum, according to officials in the minister's office. 

Officials told CBC News that the postponement of her speech was due to the trade negotiations, which sources say intensified this week in the face of Monday's U.S. congressional deadline.”

Wait just one minute.  The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) has not expired.

NAFTA is still intact and in place.

All the angst, and rhetoric, are over revisions to NAFTA, driven by U.S. President Trump.

Trump has threatened to withdraw from NAFTA if he does not get changes. He can do so by providing notice required, and with the approval of the US Congress and Senate.  Talk of the US and Mexico moving ahead with a separate deal to replace NAFTA is not possible.

Until Mexico, and the US, provide notice of withdrawal from NAFTA, the agreement remains in force. Until Congress and the Senate approve the withdrawal of the United States, NAFTA continues in force.

NAFTA negotiations have turned into (very bad) political theatre. Neither Canada, nor the United States, are interested in effects on the economies or societies of their respective nations. They are both locked in an ego-driven power struggle that can seriously disrupt living standards of both nations.

Those with high incomes, or accumulated wealth, will feel effects the least, but tens of millions of ordinary citizens will not be so fortunate. Our negotiators are juggling hand grenades, with the pins pulled, primarily because they are immune from the effects of an explosion.

Negotiations are taking place behind closed doors, not because they are too complex for us to understand, but because leaders are afraid we will understand.
         

Why? What do you have to hide from the public you serve?



John Feldsted is a political consultant and strategist, who makes his home in Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...

Labels

Show more