Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

No incentives were given. Folks just bought in almost instantly. And some of us... me included, still compost at home as well


Today, an exciting post filled with intrigue, suspense, ethics, chaos and more!!!  No … actually it’s about GARBAGE. 



I know, NOT exciting at all, however a topic with is important if the next generation isn’t to be overrun by it.  A week and a half ago (September 8th) the Government of BC, issued a media release, "Changes to Organic Matter Recycling Regulation proposed"


The Organic Matter Recycling Regulation (OMRR) is currently undergoing a comprehensive review to, as the government states, ensure it remains protective of human health and the environment. The 2018 Intentions Paper is now available for review, and comment, with those interested invited to submit comments by November 8th, to be considered in preparing the proposed revisions to the regulation. Review the 2018 Intentions Paper (PDF)



In reading through the media release and intentions paper, I was interested to note that food scraps, grass clippings, and animal manure and human waste can represent up to 40% of all waste that is sent for disposal. The logical conclusion for that would then be; keeping organic materials out of our landfills will extend their life, as well as reduce the production of greenhouse gases, particularly methane. 



At yesterdays (September 18th) city council meeting Dieter Dudy apparently brought up the topic of organics recycling, according to fellow councilor Kathy Sinclair.  She stated to me that, “We have the means to do organic pickup, but currently nowhere to put it. Staff is investigating whether organic matter can be added to a bio-solids solution that is still in the works. A report on that is upcoming.”



While our province is working toward a target of 75% of the population being covered by organic waste disposal restrictions by 2020, I wondered how that fits with policies other communities are undertaking, and if we are on track for that goal.



North Cowichan City Councillor Al Siebring, informed me that they’ve had the “kitchen pitch-in” program for household organics since 2012.  



It has reduced the volume/weight of “garbage” into our solid waste stream by close to of 50%”, he stated.  “The separated organics are all processed and resold as compost here on the Island.”

The Municipality of North Cowichan is at the head of the curve when it comes to the disposal of these organics”, he continued.



Up in my old hometown of Williams Lake former MLA, and now city mayor, Walt Cobb indicated … “Our landfill and recycling are all contracted through the Cariboo Regional District, so I am not sure what their plans are”.



I do know that our Conservation Society that help us promote recycling and reuse is working on some composting.  Whenever there is any kind of food event, they are there separating and making people aware of the food separation needs so it is not contaminated.”



So what kinds of funding are being made available, to municipal governments, towards processes (such as additionally scheduled pick-ups for organic matter only, which will allow communities to meet the BC government targets of 75% of the population being covered by organic waste disposal restrictions?  Here’s Fort St. John city mayor Lori Ackerman:



Not all communities were included in the recycling program so not all communities ‘benefit’ if that is the right word, from them.  When you think of municipal services, think property tax and hope for a grant program from either level of senior government.”



Early in October, the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy will be conducting three informational webinars on the intentions paper, in support of the current consultation for the OMRR Policy Intentions Paper.  These webinars, for stakeholders and interested parties (I am registered), will provide an overview of the Intentions Paper and provide guidance for stakeholders in preparing their responses.



Regional Districts around the province should definitely be on those webinars, at least it seems they should be given what both Mayors Lori Ackerman and Walt Cob indicated.



According to Ackerman, while Fort St. John is looking at organics, “… it is the Regional District that manages solid waste.  We must wait to have them put in the infrastructure to compost, otherwise we are spending to collect it separately, and it just goes to the landfill”.



Walt Cobb was a little blunter, indicating … “The majority of our input (into how and what waste is collected) is how much we pay.  We have trouble even getting them to increase the tipping fees to not only help cover the costs but as an incentive to do more recycling.”



Steve Forseth, himself an area director for the Cariboo Regional District (CRD) commented, “RD’s should be involved as this topic refers ultimately refer to a Regional District Solid Waste Management Plan, which both Electoral Area Directors / Municipal reps all have equal input into, and a vote on.  If not the case, not surprising but deeply disappointing”.



He followed that up by observing, “Mayors’ often comment on Solid Waste costs but they are part of the Regional puzzle on solid waste.  Regional District Boards will take their input into consideration as decisions on solid waste are made.”



Obviously, there is much, by way of organics, that can be recycled … and no one should have any doubt about that.  Some, in the following list, might surprise you however:
… food waste, animal bedding, bio-solids, brewery and winery wastes, domestic septic tank sludge, fish and hatchery wastes, manure, milk processing waste and whey, plant matter derived from processing plants, poultry carcasses, red-meat waste, untreated and unprocessed wood residuals, and yard waste.



Bottom line according to the Organic Material Recycling Report?  Organic matter is a valuable resource (which anyone who gardens is well aware of) … AND … the use of organic matter provides for the recycling of nutrients, and it helps divert organics from our landfills.



From what North Cowichan councilor Al Siebring had to say, it seems like perhaps they have one of the better handles on organics already.



Regular garbage and non-organic recycling is every other week.  Which means we always put two cans to the curb.  One for organics, and a second for either garbage or recycling.  It’s the only ‘weekly’ pickup we do.”

And he says he is very happy with the way it is working.  Incredible, at least to me was this comment from him, “No incentives were given.  Folks just bought in almost instantly.  And some of us... me included, still compost at home as well.



And from CRD representative Steve Forseth, “The Cariboo RD is re-doing our Solid Waste Plan, which will look at things like Recycling including organic waste (grass, etc). I expect that we’ll start the public consultation sometime in 2020 with the process complete sometime in 2022.”

It looks like they are well on their way as well.



Sampling … monitoring … environmental controls and protection … what can and can’t go into organic recycling … compliance checks. 


All of these and more will have to be considered as the province moves forward to that goal of reducing the 40% organics which currently go in to our landfills … and toward the 75% target of being covered by organic waste disposal restrictions. 

In Kamloops, I’m Alan Forseth, and I hope you’ll join the discussion on this, or any other topic presented here.  Do you agree … disagree?  Post your thoughts in the Comment Section directly below.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2027: After a Decade of Decline, NDP Budget Delivers an Assault on Seniors, Working Families, and Small Businesses

Peter Milobar, BC Conservative Finance Critic, condemned the NDP government’s latest budget as the result of a decade of decline that has left British Columbians broke, unsafe, and paying more for less.   “After ten years of NDP mismanagement, this budget is an assault on seniors, working families, and the small businesses that drive our economy,” said Milobar. “The NDP have turned their back on the people working hardest to make ends meet and the seniors who built this province.” Milobar pointed to a new $1.1 billion annual income tax increase and warned that the government is piling new costs onto households already struggling with affordability.   “This government keeps asking British Columbians for more, while delivering less,” Milobar said. “The question people are asking is simple: Where has all the money gone?” Milobar noted that BC has gone from a surplus in the first year of NDP government to a projected deficit of more than $13 billion this year, while prov...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...

Labels

Show more