Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

It appears that our nanny state government wants to ensure all child-care is only available through licensed government sanctioned facilities


Today the BC NDP government announced that thousands of early childhood educators to benefit from new supports and wage boosts.  So, what will that mean for parents of children in licensed child care facilities … and what about those small at home child care facilities which are not licensed by the province?

Earlier in June, the government announced it was investing $750,000 per year in a new grant program that would offer un-licensed providers caring for a maximum of 2 children, a new source of funding to become licensed.  They would then have the ability to care for up to 8 children.  The available grants were to provide funding of up to $4,500 for providers pursuing an in-home multi-age (IHMA) child care licence … and up to $4,000 for providers pursuing a family child care licence.

But what about those child care providers NOT wish to expand? Why would funding not be made available to them?  I can think of one reason, and one reason only.  It appears that our nanny state government wants to ensure all child-care is only available through licensed government sanctioned facilities.  And there are a multitude of reasons for this, I believe.


One ... a pay scale that in the long run will see child-care providers unionized and members of the BCGEU – something similar to what is now happening on large-scale government infrastructure projects.  You’re in the union, and your company agrees to it, or you don’t get a share of monies that government, in its largesse using OUR money from taxation, hands out.

Two … government begins to slowly intercede and intervene in programs being offered, and what the content of those programs might be.

Three … small in-home day cares eventually are forced out because of government subsidies that allow licensed providers to offer a much lower cost for parents.  And with day care costs every rising, and parents having to pay more and more, it’s obvious where parents will go.

What else happened earlier this Summer?  In mid-July the BC government announced that 22,000 new licensed spaces would be coming over the next three years.  You caught that, right?  Licensed Child Care Spaces, which would then as I noted just a moment ago, be more affordable.  Funding made easier to access for private-sector, non-profit and public-sector child care providers. 

Money again going into licensed facilities (including public-sector child care facilities) where government is slowly but surely inserting their tentacles into curriculum, wages, unionization, and more specifically, who gets funding and who doesn’t.

Katrine Conroy, Minister of Children and Family Development stated that. “Creating more licensed, affordable child care spaces is a key part of our new Childcare BC plan, so parents can have the peace of mind they need and quality care they can rely on.”

Licensed Child Care Spaces -- Government interference in the marketplace.

For many years there have been small non-profits, and co-ops, providing child-care that was more affordable, however they didn’t have the same degree of government intrusion into every aspect of how they delivered the service they provided.  The same for small at home providers of child care.

I agree totally with the comment from Katrine Conroy (BC’s Minister of Children and Family Development) that, “Early childhood educators are the heart of BC’s child care system, and their passion and dedication are key to setting BC kids on the path to future success,”

What I don’t agree with however is that this can ONLY be delivered by licensed child care spaces.

The Minister, and her government, has clearly shown that it plans to provide wage enhancements, government funding for subsidies, government funding for creation of spaces, and more for child-care.

It is also showing that its intent is to freeze out, and therefore end as much as possible, the small in-home care provider.  As I stated earlier on this opinion piece … it appears that our nanny state government wants to ensure that all child-care is only available through licensed government sanctioned facilities.

Our government at work – using our money – whether we agree with what it’s doing or not.

In Kamloops, I’m Alan Forseth, and I hope you’ll join the discussion.  Do you agree?  Let me know by posting your thoughts in the Comment Section directly below.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

“4.5 million hectares of forest lands have burned since 2023, and the best they can do is point to a 90-hectare block being salvaged?” ~~ Ward Stamer, Kamloops-North Thompson MLA

Today, BC NDP forest Minister Ravi Parmar made this pronouncement; ‘Removing red tape has sped up permitting, allowing for more wood to be salvaged, quicker’. 4.5 million hectares of forest lands have burned since 2023, and the best they can do is point to a 90-hectare block?    ~~ BC Conservative Forests Critic Ward Stamer While acknowledging the NDP government has recognized improvements were needed in permitting and accessing burnt fibre in a timely fashion, the reality is, they are barely making a dent in the problem.  This government's recognition that only seven percent of pulp mill fibre came from burnt timber in 2024-25, quite simply put, is a failure. And the recent announcement, just three weeks ago, that the Crofton Pulp Mill would be permanently closing, is proof of that.     Instead of Premier David Eby’s government addressing core issues being faced by British Columbia’s forest industry, they are doing little more than manipulating the facts, ...
1 comment
Read more

A message from BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer, and the Kamloops – North Thompson Riding Association

2025 was a busy first year. As a Caucus, we worked very hard to defeat Bills 14 and 15, legislation which allows the provincial government to move ahead without environmental assessments on renewable projects, and that also allows cabinet to build infrastructure projects without getting approval from local municipal governments. This is not acceptable to your BC Conservative caucus, and we will continue to press this government for open and transparent projects in the future.  Two things we had success in were having the first Private Members bill passed in over 40 years. The first was Jody Toors Prenatal and Post Natal Care bill, and then there was my private members Bill M217 Mandatory Dashcams in commercial vehicles (passed second reading unanimously and is heading to Committee in February). Regrettably, much of the legislation passed by the government was little more than housekeeping bills, or opportunities to strengthen the ability of Cabinet Ministers to bypass the BC legi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Wildfire waste plan torched -- Forestry critic Stamer calls BC's wildfire salvage rate 'a failure'

Claims that BC is making progress salvaging wildfire-damaged timber are masking deeper problems in the forest sector, the province’s forestry critic says. Last week, BC’s Ministry of Forests said mills in the province processed more than one million cubic metres of wildfire chips in 2024-25, up from 500,000 cubic metres in 2023 and representing about seven per cent of all processed wood. Kamloops-North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer said those claims of progress ignore the reality that only a fraction of burned timber is being used ... CLICK HERE for the full story
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more