Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

RUSTAD: New approach needed to fight wildfires

MLA John Rustad -- Nechako Lake riding

The 2018 BC wildfire season has already been declared the worst on record.

Firefighters have done an amazing job and we are all thankful for their work.
The most import thing to keep mind is how much did we learn from the 2017 wildfire season, and did we put that knowledge to good use this year?

Unfortunately, we have been seeing a similar pattern to the provincial response as we saw last summer. In particular, the way communities have been managed, coordination between different levels of government, engagement with First Nations and in some cases and unwillingness to embrace new technology.

An independent review of the 2017 wildfire season was conducted, yet the terms of reference ignored the calls by many experts who were telling the government to focus more on forest management, new technology and proper response.  As a result, we are now seeing an eroding of confidence in BC Wildfire Service (BCWS) management and a growing desire by residents to take matters into their own hands.

For example, the Nadleh Whut’en First Nation took matters into their own hands, formed a fire response team, hired an incident manager, equipped themselves and made a difference. They were then brought into the BCWS response on the Shovel Lake fire. Shouldn’t this be a lesson regarding how individual communities and rural area residents could be organized and deployed to help with initial responses to fires?

Time and time again stories emerge from contractors about how they are held back or even threatened by BCWS staff if they try to respond quickly to a new fire. In many cases those first few hours could be the difference between putting out a fire and seeing it become a significant fire of note. How can this be better utilized as part of BC’s initial response?

New technologies such as mass water delivery systems need to be explored, tested and adopted by the BCWS. Protecting residential areas is one use but the potential for other applications in fighting fires. There was a successful utilization of this equipment this year but clearly more needs to be done to better understand and utilize this new technology.

Nobody wants to see people put their lives at risk by staying in an evacuation order area. However, many rural residents, farmers and others are seeing this as their best choice. This year, many people chose to ignore the warnings and stay to fight fires on the south side of Francois Lake. The initial response by the BCWS was to effectively blockade them. They had trouble getting basic supplies of food, fuel and desperately needed firefighting equipment. Tensions were high and the RCMP were caught in the middle trying to do the best job they could.

A better approach needs to be found to support people rather than to try and force them to leave.

All of this leads to the need for the BC government to undertake an independent review of how fires are fought. We are calling on the BC NDP to do the right thing and commission an independent report, or perhaps even a royal commission, so that the BCWS can be more effective in the years to come.

~~ by John Rustad

John Rustad worked in the forest industry in logging and forest management. He started and operated Western Geographic Information Systems Inc. from 1995 to 2002 where he was engaged in forestry consulting. 

John was first elected to the BC Legislature in 2005 and was re-elected in 2009, 2013 and 2017. He served in various capacities including parliamentary secretary for Silviculture, parliamentary secretary for Forests, Minister of Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation and Minister of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations. 

He is currently the critic for FLNRORD.

Comments

  1. Well said. Having lived for many years, under the wings of the Martin Mars water bombers, I'm well aware of the effectiveness of the "rapid, over-whelming response" to forest fires, as a method of fighting such. From the late '60s, for a forty year period, many factors came together to give Vancouver Island very good forest fire control. 'Passing the torch' from private industry, into the hands of the BC Forest Service has not given us smokeless air and reassuring property protection but rather many empty excuses about a lack of resources and the ravages of oncoming climate change. I wish Mr Rustad luck in trying to use reason to sway so many unreasonable people.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more