Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

BCs new better beverage tax means ... NO tax on that big caramel-mocha-frampa-cappa-coffee ... but YES to a bottle of water


USED WITH PERMISSION of the author, BC Director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, Kris Sims


The British Columbia government is using a seven per cent tax to make you make better beverage decisions. But study hard because this multiple-choice test isn’t easy.

The tax hits pop. Obvious, right? But it also hits pop that doesn’t have sugar, such as diet pop and fancy pop sweetened with stevia. What about that big caramel-mocha-frampa-cappa-coffee with the quadruple pump of hazelnut syrup and whipped cream with sprinkles? There’s lots of sugar, but no tax. And, for the bonus question, if you’re at the vending machine and pick water, you win, right? Nope – the sugar tax hits that water too.

Here’s the kicker: studies show taxes won’t make you skinnier, but they do make governments a lot of money.

B.C. Finance Minister Carole James announced the new pop tax during the 2020 budget presentation. The sweetened drinks tax will pour $37 million out of taxpayers’ wallets and into the brimming tankards of government.

This new tax is fizzing over with problems.


While B.C.’s new seven per cent tax on sweetened drinks doesn’t apply to expensive sugary coffee drinks, it inexplicably does apply to other drinks that contain zero sugar


Pop taxes don’t work as advertised. They’re supposed to reduce consumption of pop and sugar – but they don’t.

Mexico tried doing this in 2014. For a short time after the national tax was introduced, pop consumption dipped. Soon, however, it bubbled back up again to pre-tax levels.

Borders can also be a problem for the sugar sheriffs. Costco parking lots prove people drive to get deals. And people drive to beat taxes too.

When Philadelphia tried a pop tax in 2017 it backfired. Its pop tax hit the downtown core, but not the suburbs. Those who could afford cars dodged the tax by driving to the ‘burbs and loading up on the tax-free sodas. Only lower-income people in the inner city paid the tax.

Some of the inner-city grocery stores couldn’t absorb the loss of the business and closed. These downtown stores were often the only source of fresh fruits and vegetables. When they closed, poor people had less access to good groceries.

People in B.C. routinely cross the border for cheaper gas. And cheese. And beer. How hard would it be to pop a flat of pop in the trunk?

Not only will the B.C. sweetened drink tax not work, but it’s also unfair.


A fancy $6 mocha coffee drink from a hip coffee shop has 52 grams of sugar and 370 calories for a medium.

A 12 ounce can of cola that costs about $1.50 from a corner store has 39 grams of sugar and 140 calories.

This is a tax that scolds food choices and it’s a tax on the working poor.

While B.C.’s new seven per cent tax on sweetened drinks doesn’t apply to expensive sugary coffee drinks, it inexplicably does apply to other drinks that contain zero sugar. Diet colas sweetened with aspartame and even fancy pops with natural sweeteners such as stevia are getting hit with the sugary drink tax.

Anything coming out of a pop tower, a soda gun at a bar or a mixed vending machine will get this tax; the moment you buy that fountain drink cup from a fast food place you’re paying the tax, even if you fill it with soda water or orange juice.

But wait, there’s more. If you buy a bottle of water from a vending machine that also sells pop, you are paying the sweetened drinks tax. On water.

We’ve learned from experience in other places that pop taxes don’t reduce consumption, therefore, they don’t help the government’s purported fight against obesity.

All they do is sweeten the deal for government, and cost taxpayers millions of dollars.


ABOUT KRIS SIMS:

Born in the town of Hope and raised on both sides of the Strait of Georgia, Kris has been employed (and taxed) since she was 12 years old.

Kris worked in radio in the Comox Valley before moving to Ottawa to work as a legislative assistant on Parliament Hill. She then joined Ottawa News Talk Radio 580 CFRA as a reporter and anchor, eventually becoming a journalist for the CTV parliamentary bureau.

Kris was a founding reporter for Sun News Network and proudly covered issues of big government, personal liberty and the rights of small-town and rural Canadians until SNN was shut down. She then worked as the director of communications for Veterans Affairs Minister Erin O’Toole, and as the senior producer for Evan Solomon at CFRA Radio.

She is proud to return to her home of British Columbia to fight for the rights of all taxpayers.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nurses Take Job Action After Years of NDP Neglect

Image Credit:  BC Nurses Union BC nurses have reached a breaking point after years of unsafe conditions, rising violence in the workplace and a government that wouldn’t listen. Now they are on the picket line fighting to be heard. Last week, nurses began job action with a 72-hour strike notice, refusing non-essential overtime and stepping back from non-nursing duties. As of Tuesday, they have escalated to picket lines for the first time in decades. This moment was avoidable. It is the result of years of unanswered concerns from the frontline workers who keep our hospitals running. Nurses have been raising the same concerns for years: unsafe staffing levels, rising violence on the job, and a workload no single person should have to carry. None of it is new, and none of it should have taken a strike vote to get the government's attention. "Nurses are exercising their legal right to job action, but it shouldn’t have had to come to this," said Kiel Giddens, MLA for...

British Columbians Still Don’t Know Who’s Paying for NDP’s BC Hydro Deal

The NDP is making billion-dollar promises with BC Hydro, but British Columbians still don’t know who will pay the bill. Last week’s memorandum of understanding isn’t what the federal government and the NDP are making it out to be. It’s an admission that the NDP failed to make the long-term investments needed to keep B.C. powered. Now British Columbians have serious questions about the cost and whether BC Hydro ratepayers will end up paying the price. David L. Williams, MLA for Salmon Arm-Shuswap and Shadow Minister for BC Hydro and Electrical Energy Development , said British Columbians deserve clear answers about the full implications of the Canada–British Columbia Cooperative Prosperity Agreement. “British Columbians deserve the full truth,” said Mr. Williams. “This multi-billion-dollar announcement does not answer who pays for cost overruns, who pays for new generation, who carries the risk if industrial customers do not materialize, or whether ratepayers will be forced ...

NDP Government Blames Everyone but Themselves

The federal government has announced new measures to support British Columbia's forestry sector, including $65 million in funding for projects across the province. While any support is welcome, it falls far short of the level of assistance other provinces have secured for key industries. Conservative Forests Critic Ward Stamer says the NDP government needs to take responsibility for its mismanagement of B.C.’s forest industry instead of trying to pass on the blame. Despite promising to create more jobs in the forest sector, the NDP government has overseen the loss of thousands of forestry jobs and 21 mill closures which have devastated communities. “If Premier Eby spent more time addressing the regulatory issues impacting the forestry sector than he did complaining about the federal government, we would not be in the position we are now,” said Stamer. “And instead of trying to place the blame for mill closures on Donald Trump, Minister of Forests Ravi Parmar should t...

Labels

Show more