Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

BCs new better beverage tax means ... NO tax on that big caramel-mocha-frampa-cappa-coffee ... but YES to a bottle of water


USED WITH PERMISSION of the author, BC Director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, Kris Sims


The British Columbia government is using a seven per cent tax to make you make better beverage decisions. But study hard because this multiple-choice test isn’t easy.

The tax hits pop. Obvious, right? But it also hits pop that doesn’t have sugar, such as diet pop and fancy pop sweetened with stevia. What about that big caramel-mocha-frampa-cappa-coffee with the quadruple pump of hazelnut syrup and whipped cream with sprinkles? There’s lots of sugar, but no tax. And, for the bonus question, if you’re at the vending machine and pick water, you win, right? Nope – the sugar tax hits that water too.

Here’s the kicker: studies show taxes won’t make you skinnier, but they do make governments a lot of money.

B.C. Finance Minister Carole James announced the new pop tax during the 2020 budget presentation. The sweetened drinks tax will pour $37 million out of taxpayers’ wallets and into the brimming tankards of government.

This new tax is fizzing over with problems.


While B.C.’s new seven per cent tax on sweetened drinks doesn’t apply to expensive sugary coffee drinks, it inexplicably does apply to other drinks that contain zero sugar


Pop taxes don’t work as advertised. They’re supposed to reduce consumption of pop and sugar – but they don’t.

Mexico tried doing this in 2014. For a short time after the national tax was introduced, pop consumption dipped. Soon, however, it bubbled back up again to pre-tax levels.

Borders can also be a problem for the sugar sheriffs. Costco parking lots prove people drive to get deals. And people drive to beat taxes too.

When Philadelphia tried a pop tax in 2017 it backfired. Its pop tax hit the downtown core, but not the suburbs. Those who could afford cars dodged the tax by driving to the ‘burbs and loading up on the tax-free sodas. Only lower-income people in the inner city paid the tax.

Some of the inner-city grocery stores couldn’t absorb the loss of the business and closed. These downtown stores were often the only source of fresh fruits and vegetables. When they closed, poor people had less access to good groceries.

People in B.C. routinely cross the border for cheaper gas. And cheese. And beer. How hard would it be to pop a flat of pop in the trunk?

Not only will the B.C. sweetened drink tax not work, but it’s also unfair.


A fancy $6 mocha coffee drink from a hip coffee shop has 52 grams of sugar and 370 calories for a medium.

A 12 ounce can of cola that costs about $1.50 from a corner store has 39 grams of sugar and 140 calories.

This is a tax that scolds food choices and it’s a tax on the working poor.

While B.C.’s new seven per cent tax on sweetened drinks doesn’t apply to expensive sugary coffee drinks, it inexplicably does apply to other drinks that contain zero sugar. Diet colas sweetened with aspartame and even fancy pops with natural sweeteners such as stevia are getting hit with the sugary drink tax.

Anything coming out of a pop tower, a soda gun at a bar or a mixed vending machine will get this tax; the moment you buy that fountain drink cup from a fast food place you’re paying the tax, even if you fill it with soda water or orange juice.

But wait, there’s more. If you buy a bottle of water from a vending machine that also sells pop, you are paying the sweetened drinks tax. On water.

We’ve learned from experience in other places that pop taxes don’t reduce consumption, therefore, they don’t help the government’s purported fight against obesity.

All they do is sweeten the deal for government, and cost taxpayers millions of dollars.


ABOUT KRIS SIMS:

Born in the town of Hope and raised on both sides of the Strait of Georgia, Kris has been employed (and taxed) since she was 12 years old.

Kris worked in radio in the Comox Valley before moving to Ottawa to work as a legislative assistant on Parliament Hill. She then joined Ottawa News Talk Radio 580 CFRA as a reporter and anchor, eventually becoming a journalist for the CTV parliamentary bureau.

Kris was a founding reporter for Sun News Network and proudly covered issues of big government, personal liberty and the rights of small-town and rural Canadians until SNN was shut down. She then worked as the director of communications for Veterans Affairs Minister Erin O’Toole, and as the senior producer for Evan Solomon at CFRA Radio.

She is proud to return to her home of British Columbia to fight for the rights of all taxpayers.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2027: After a Decade of Decline, NDP Budget Delivers an Assault on Seniors, Working Families, and Small Businesses

Peter Milobar, BC Conservative Finance Critic, condemned the NDP government’s latest budget as the result of a decade of decline that has left British Columbians broke, unsafe, and paying more for less.   “After ten years of NDP mismanagement, this budget is an assault on seniors, working families, and the small businesses that drive our economy,” said Milobar. “The NDP have turned their back on the people working hardest to make ends meet and the seniors who built this province.” Milobar pointed to a new $1.1 billion annual income tax increase and warned that the government is piling new costs onto households already struggling with affordability.   “This government keeps asking British Columbians for more, while delivering less,” Milobar said. “The question people are asking is simple: Where has all the money gone?” Milobar noted that BC has gone from a surplus in the first year of NDP government to a projected deficit of more than $13 billion this year, while prov...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...

Labels

Show more