Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Wet’suwet’en Hereditary Chiefs were able to negotiate rights and title over their territory. Fraser and Bennett? They got nothing as ‘differences remain’ in the Coastal GasLink dispute

Scott Fraser, BC Minister of
Indigenous Relations and
Reconciliation

Yesterday, the provincial and federal governments, along with Wet’suwet’en Hereditary Chiefs, issued a joint statement saying three days of talks had been ... frank and substantive ... on issues around Wet’suwet’en rights and title.

According to Scott Fraser, BC’s Minister of Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation -- Carolyn Bennett, federal Minister of Crown - Indigenous Relations -- and Wet’suwet’en Hereditary Chief Woos -- talks were apparently split into two separate areas of discussion. On one of these, there has been agreement ... on the other, there has not.

According to the government, and the Hereditary Chiefs, they have agreed to what both parties are calling, ‘... commitments to an expedited process to implement a draft agreement on Wet’suwet’en rights and title’.

This, apparently, will be reviewed by what was described as ... Wet’suwet’en clan members through Wet’suwet’en governance protocols for ratification.

I believe the democratic rights of all British Columbians, to have a say on issues that directly impact them, should be respected. This is why we hope the process, spoken of, will include the hundreds of members of the Wet’suwet’en First Nation, and their elected government. This however, will be something for the Wet’suwet’en people, and their leadership, to decide on.

Regarding the other area of discussion however -- despite three days of talks, the issue of what will happen with the Coastal GasLink pipeline, is still very much still in the air. 


Wet’suwet’en Hereditary Chiefs were able to negotiate rights and title over their territory ... Fraser and Bennett got nothing as ‘differences remain’ in the Coastal GasLink dispute


For weeks the people of BC were held hostage by protests and blockades -- alleged to be in support of the Wet’suwet’en Hereditary Chiefs – and against Coastal GasLink.

We deserve to know why the federal minister for Crown and Indigenous Relations, Carolyn Bennett – along with Scott Fraser, BC’s Minister for Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation – were not come to some kind of agreement regarding the pipeline. 


Wet'suwet'en Hereditary Chief Woos
Why was the ONLY thing negotiated, and successfully I might add by the Hereditary Chiefs, was Wet’suwet’en rights and title to territory in their region?  

While we can all have a level of appreciation for both levels of government (federal and provincial) being able to engage in what they called ... ‘direct discussions’, as they ‘explored means to come to a resolution’ ... British Columbians must be asking themselves ... 

Will work on the Coastal GasLink pipeline now proceed without further disruption?’

Negotiations should be a two-way street, and government needs to insist that those demonstrating and causing disruptions, in their attempts to halt construction of the Coastal GasLink project, will stop their actions.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more