Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Wet’suwet’en Hereditary Chiefs were able to negotiate rights and title over their territory. Fraser and Bennett? They got nothing as ‘differences remain’ in the Coastal GasLink dispute

Scott Fraser, BC Minister of
Indigenous Relations and
Reconciliation

Yesterday, the provincial and federal governments, along with Wet’suwet’en Hereditary Chiefs, issued a joint statement saying three days of talks had been ... frank and substantive ... on issues around Wet’suwet’en rights and title.

According to Scott Fraser, BC’s Minister of Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation -- Carolyn Bennett, federal Minister of Crown - Indigenous Relations -- and Wet’suwet’en Hereditary Chief Woos -- talks were apparently split into two separate areas of discussion. On one of these, there has been agreement ... on the other, there has not.

According to the government, and the Hereditary Chiefs, they have agreed to what both parties are calling, ‘... commitments to an expedited process to implement a draft agreement on Wet’suwet’en rights and title’.

This, apparently, will be reviewed by what was described as ... Wet’suwet’en clan members through Wet’suwet’en governance protocols for ratification.

I believe the democratic rights of all British Columbians, to have a say on issues that directly impact them, should be respected. This is why we hope the process, spoken of, will include the hundreds of members of the Wet’suwet’en First Nation, and their elected government. This however, will be something for the Wet’suwet’en people, and their leadership, to decide on.

Regarding the other area of discussion however -- despite three days of talks, the issue of what will happen with the Coastal GasLink pipeline, is still very much still in the air. 


Wet’suwet’en Hereditary Chiefs were able to negotiate rights and title over their territory ... Fraser and Bennett got nothing as ‘differences remain’ in the Coastal GasLink dispute


For weeks the people of BC were held hostage by protests and blockades -- alleged to be in support of the Wet’suwet’en Hereditary Chiefs – and against Coastal GasLink.

We deserve to know why the federal minister for Crown and Indigenous Relations, Carolyn Bennett – along with Scott Fraser, BC’s Minister for Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation – were not come to some kind of agreement regarding the pipeline. 


Wet'suwet'en Hereditary Chief Woos
Why was the ONLY thing negotiated, and successfully I might add by the Hereditary Chiefs, was Wet’suwet’en rights and title to territory in their region?  

While we can all have a level of appreciation for both levels of government (federal and provincial) being able to engage in what they called ... ‘direct discussions’, as they ‘explored means to come to a resolution’ ... British Columbians must be asking themselves ... 

Will work on the Coastal GasLink pipeline now proceed without further disruption?’

Negotiations should be a two-way street, and government needs to insist that those demonstrating and causing disruptions, in their attempts to halt construction of the Coastal GasLink project, will stop their actions.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more