Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- the Delgamuukw decision did not address indigenous governance, sovereignty, or any of the issues respecting indigenous self-governance -- those issues remain unresolved

Our government’s approach to negotiations with hereditary chiefs is perplexing, unorthodox and unclear; it also appears our government has capitulated to the demands of Hereditary Chiefs.

The 1997 Supreme Court Delgamuukw decision, (File No. 23799) does not appear to be a landmark decision in any way shape or form. The Delgamuukw decision did not provide indigenous people or hereditary chiefs with unfettered ownership of claimed lands.

The decision held that hereditary title was not absolute, and could be overridden to allow for projects in the best interests of non-indigenous people.     

Supreme Court of Canada
The decision did not set out the extent of claimed lands; that still must be negotiated. Claims are still outstanding.

The Delgamuukw decision did not provide hereditary chiefs with ownership of claimed lands; it held that indigenous land ownership was held by the community, not by chiefs.

Indigenous people cannot enjoy land ownership rights that surpasses the rights of non-indigenous land owners. When we are faced with public works projects including natural resources developments, roads and highways, power transmission lines, telephone and cable lines, transmission towers and a host of other works, our property rights can be overridden by expropriation or easements with commensurate compensation.

The BC tentative agreement cannot be allowed to change to course of common law land ownership precedents.


Finally, the Delgamuukw decision did not address indigenous governance, sovereignty, or any of the issues respecting indigenous self-governance. Those issues remain unresolved. 

The Supreme Court of Canada held that such issues would require a separate trial.

Negotiating with hereditary chiefs under this backdrop is very high risk. Our Prime Minister’s pleas for patience are nonsense.

The government has not shared the substance of the alleged agreements with us, so we have nothing to be patient about.

This government has made no effort to ensure that road and rail disruptions won’t start up again tomorrow, or on any subsequent day. We are left vulnerable without excuse.

This government has to go; it is failing to maintain order and peace.

John Feldsted
Political Commentator, Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2027: After a Decade of Decline, NDP Budget Delivers an Assault on Seniors, Working Families, and Small Businesses

Peter Milobar, BC Conservative Finance Critic, condemned the NDP government’s latest budget as the result of a decade of decline that has left British Columbians broke, unsafe, and paying more for less.   “After ten years of NDP mismanagement, this budget is an assault on seniors, working families, and the small businesses that drive our economy,” said Milobar. “The NDP have turned their back on the people working hardest to make ends meet and the seniors who built this province.” Milobar pointed to a new $1.1 billion annual income tax increase and warned that the government is piling new costs onto households already struggling with affordability.   “This government keeps asking British Columbians for more, while delivering less,” Milobar said. “The question people are asking is simple: Where has all the money gone?” Milobar noted that BC has gone from a surplus in the first year of NDP government to a projected deficit of more than $13 billion this year, while prov...
Post a Comment
Read more

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more