Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ADAM OLSEN -- Last week the BC government took control of yet another senior's home owned by Retirement Concepts -- they were forced do this because of neglect of seniors


Last week the B.C. government took control of a fourth retirement home from Retirement Concepts, British Columbia’s largest chain of for-profit care homes, citing neglect of seniors.

The home in Summerland joins homes in Comox, Nanaimo and Victoria that are already under the control of BC’s health authorities. In total, 30 per cent of the long-term care beds that Retirement Concepts owns are now being run by government agents. The company is paid by taxpayers to provide care, but the health authorities are clawing back the cost of running those facilities they now control.

Retirement Concepts was established in 1988 and in 2016 the federal government’s Investment Review Division accepted the foreign takeover of Retirement Concepts by Anbang Insurance Group.

A few months after the purchase, the chairman of Anbang was jailed for fraud by Chinese authorities and the company was put under the control of China’s insurance regulator. The Chinese government then created the Dajia Insurance Group to take control of all the assets and look into possibly selling them to foreign investors.

In summary Retirement Concepts is the largest provider of long-term care in British Columbia, and it's owned by a state-backed Chinese insurance company. A foreign-owned, for-profit company which is repeatedly providing wholly inadequate care to our seniors.

My questions were to see if the government would be proactive in addressing the clear pattern of inadequate seniors care we see emerging. They must hold the company accountable, ensure our elders are receiving the care they deserve, and make sure we are not paying a foreign company that continues to fail our seniors.

[Transcript – Oral Question Period]

CARE STANDARDS AT RETIREMENT CONCEPTS SENIORS CARE FACILITIES

Adam Olsen:
Last week the B.C. government took control of yet another senior's home owned by Retirement Concepts. They were forced do this because of neglect of seniors.

This is the fourth Retirement Concepts facility that authorities have taken over, and there are serious concerns about others. One family just filed a class action lawsuit against another Retirement Concepts facility, citing negligence, emotional and physical injuries and wrongful death.

Retirement Concepts is the largest provider of long-term care in British Columbia, and it's owned by a state-backed Chinese insurance company. A foreign-owned, for-profit company is repeatedly providing wholly inadequate care to our seniors. We are seeing a clear pattern here.

It's not enough to intervene in just the most egregious cases or to react to whistle-blowers. It seems that for- profit care homes are allowed to repeatedly put profit margins ahead of care.

My question is to the Minister of Health. Beyond simply responding to these situations when they come to light, how is the minister holding this company accountable and ensuring that our elders are not facing inadequate care and neglect?

Adrian Dix:
Indeed, the situation at Retirement Concepts is a serious situation, but I want to put this very much in context. What has happened at Retirement Concepts in Comox, in Nanaimo, in Victoria and now in Summerland is a serious situation that comes through a very formal process led by medical officers of health.

That process and taking over a facility has happened seven times since 1990. Six of those are by Retirement Concepts. It's very important not to suggest that other care providers are in the same boat. This is, in this case, a Retirement Concepts problem. We need to address it, and they need to address it.

Last week they were called to a meeting — including the new parent company, called Daja — that was called with the Deputy Minister of Health. We've clearly laid out our expectations that this situation cannot continue.

Our administrators are doing, I think, an excellent job in bringing these facilities up to standard. I think we have to continue to do that work. It is unacceptable that the government of British Columbia is running 511 of Retirement Concepts' 1,641 beds. That's 31 percent of their beds. It is not good enough, and we are going to continue to take action until they're brought up to standard.

Mr. Speaker: Leader of the Third Party on a supplemental.


Adam Olsen:
To be very clear, this question is about Retirement Concepts and Retirement Concepts alone. I'm glad to hear the response from the minister. I'm glad to hear that his staff are taking action. I'm really concerned about the situation that exists. There are still a number of rooms that are controlled by this company. I think that the concern continues to arise knowing that there are seniors that are still under the care of this company.

The minister said — this was a few months ago: "Whenever there are changes in ownership in care homes, we have to review to see if there are changes required." As the minister just noted, the former company Anbang has been restructured, and now the company that controls Retirement Concepts is under a new state-backed insurance group. It could be argued that these are significant changes in ownership.

My question is to the Minister of Health. Will the government take immediate steps to take control of the remainder of the Retirement Concepts homes to ensure that all seniors can rely on getting the care that they need in our province?

Adrian Dix:
Well, the takeover of Retirement Concepts occurred in 2016. The review of such takeovers is made by Investment Canada. Concerns were expressed, certainly by me and other British Columbians, about that takeover at that time. But the federal government approved the takeover.

I don't want anyone at Retirement Concepts or anyone else to think that people are going to take this responsibility away from them. They have the responsibility to provide care. We have the responsibility to regulate, and we will.

I think it's an important consideration here, the company in question. It is why, in this case — after Comox and after Nanaimo and after Victoria and now after Summerland — we contacted and have met and will continue to meet not just with Retirement Concepts as a company or the operating company — which are the old owners, by the way — but the holding company to make sure that everybody is held accountable here, because seniors are in care right now.

They deserve our support, and they will have it.


Adam Olsen ... is the Green Party MLA for Saanich North and the Islands and Member of Tsartlip First Nation.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more