Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

RESOURCE WORKS -- Once this crisis is over, our federal and provincial governments will be faced with difficult decisions about spending and stimulus


Stewart Muir and Margareta Dovgal look at emerging ideas for a strong recovery from the pandemic ...



recent paper from David Williams of the Business Council of British Columbia points to Canada's nagging inability to improve living standards for its residents.

Comments Williams: "Once the COVID-19 crisis has passed, it will be important for policymakers to start addressing the inefficiencies and disincentives in Canada’s economy that have been holding back productivity growth and the spirit of innovation."

He points to five long-term priorities that will allow for a stronger economy in the recovery phase:

  1. Modernizing the tax system
  2. Delivering certainty and timeliness in regulatory processes
  3. Reducing inter-provincial trade barriers
  4. Invigorating competition in product markets
  5. Spurring business innovation and capital investment.

For those preoccupied with the natural resource economy, all five of those priorities are relevant. However, the most significant ones are numbers 2 and 5: regulatory times and the combined factors of innovation and investment.

Research conducted by Margareta Dovgal for Resource Works found that the impact of regulatory uncertainty on investment in oil & gas is also detrimental to Canada’s innovation performance. Market forces alone do not explain the decline in capital investment in Canadian energy, which points to a troubling loss of investor confidence.

Moreover, the resulting constraints on transportation infrastructure mean that energy sector growth is capped and therefore so is the adoption of new technologies.

While incremental process improvements are common, large-scale revamps to deliver drastically improved environmental performance typically occur when a new project (such as a mine, well, or refinery) is built. So, what happens when these projects aren’t being built?

Resource industries are typically among the largest innovation spenders. Yet in the typical urban environment, the vision of modern innovation that most readily comes to mind includes creative technology, bio-medicine, and urban infrastructure.

In other words, everything but our country’s top innovation performers.


It’s not just oil and gas, to be clear, but it’s also innovation in mining, forestry, and aquaculture that matters here.

Across natural resource industries, innovators are working to reduce emissions, deliver superior local environmental impacts from water to wildlife management, and reduce cost and stay competitive on the global commodities market so that they can continue to create Canadian jobs.

These vital activities will become more important than ever before.


Challenging times have already started.

Once this crisis is over, our federal and provincial governments will be faced with difficult decisions about spending and stimulus. Ensuring that the right enabling conditions are there for our most productive sectors is critical.

Market conditions are unavoidable for some products, but they are far from the only barrier to natural resource developments. Unlike the Saudi-Russia price war, improving both the regulatory and innovation ecosystems is very much in the hands of government.

It never made sense to kneecap our major resource development in the best of times. 

It makes even less sense to do that now, when economic recovery is needed so direly and when natural resource industries can play their part.

Comments

  1. It's regrettable and harmful that Western Canada's petroleum and natural gas industries are treated by some politicians and political pressure groups as pariah industries that if shut down would benefit the environment without hurting the economy because there are so many viable alternatives to oil and gas (which is quite untrue) - and in the process would garner lots of votes (albeit from people who don't realize how ignorant they are).
    In fact Western Canada's abundant supplies of oil, gas and coal (and other resource products like potash and wheat) are one of the main drivers of Canada's relatively prosperous economy, enabling a low-population nation to punch far above its GDP weight in world affairs.
    Please greenflakes, while you are pushing us onto the road to eco nirvana please try to realize that until we are able to get there responsibly and practically we should maximize the value and advantages of our existing resource industries which are being developed generally to excellent standards compared with communist and Third World economies.
    That is especially the case now that Canada is trying to cope with the COVID19 crisis; now is not the time to cripple Canada's economy with demands to prematurely adopt politically-correct reforms to environment and resource industries that would hurt more than help the viability of the Canadian and provincial economies.
    .

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

GORDON F. D. WILSON: When The Trick Masquerades as The Treat

Thirty-seven years ago, Halloween 1987, I became the leader of the BC Liberal Party.   British Columbia was badly polarized. Social Credit held one side and the NDP the other. It had been twelve years, 1975, since Liberal MLAs Garde Gardom, Pat McGeer, and Alan Williams had walked away from their party to join Social Credit, one year after the lone Progressive Conservative MLA Hugh Curtis had abandoned his party to sit with Bill Bennett, the son and heir apparent to long-serving BC Premier, WAC Bennett.   An unwritten agreement by the biggest Canadian political shareholders, the federal Liberals and Conservatives, decided that if British Columbia was to remain a lucrative franchise from a revenue perspective, they couldn’t risk splitting the electoral vote and electing the real enemy, the NDP, so no resources would be used to finance either a Liberal or Conservative party provincially.   “There are two sides to every street,” I was told by a very prominent Canadian businessman who cont

FORSETH: As a BC Conservative member, and campaign worker, I will again state that the fact these errors were found -- AND brought to light BY Elections BC -- shows the system IS working

Sadly, two and a half weeks after the BC provincial election campaign, those who want to undermine our political process are still at.  PLUS, we also have one who doesn’t even live in our country, never mind our province. I speak of the buffoon running for President of the United States, who has poisoned the well when it comes to faith in the electoral process. Just today alone, comments such as the following, were being made of posts that I shared online: ... all the votes they keep finding has just favoured NDP on in all critical ridings and soon they will flip another riding in favour of NDP, Come on. ... Elections BC has ridiculed British Columbians, and I no longer have confidence or trust in their process and competence regarding the results Then there are others online, with comments like these – who are claiming fraud in the October 19th election: ... Who is the oversight for Elections BC? They should be investigated for election fraud! ... Fraudulent election ... should be red

Rob Shaw: Eby should be worried why mudslinging missed the mark in B.C. election

  Why did a BC NDP election campaign overwhelmingly focused on attacking the character of the BC Conservatives fail to prevent a blue wave that came within 27 votes of toppling the governing party? Partly because voters didn’t much care for, or about, all the New Democrat mudslinging. They were just hopping mad about some very specific issues ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more