Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ADAM OLSEN - Continuing a conversation about whether or not these communities are rural is absurd

 


For nearly a decade Capital Regional District (CRD) Electoral Area Directors from Salt Spring Island, the Southern Gulf Islands and Juan de Fuca have been advocating for a change in their designation from urban to rural.

 

There is no doubt that these unincorporated communities are rural, however because they are members of the CRD they are deemed urban. As a result, they are not able to apply for important supports designed for rural communities.

 

The BC NDP finally made the change on the eve of the snap election this Fall.

 

However, the change was not afforded to all the communities, only the communities in Premier John Horgan’s riding (Juan de Fuca) benefited from Order in Council 533.

 

In Question Period I asked new Hon. Ravi Kahlon, new Minister of Jobs, Economic Recovery, and Innovation about this situation.

 

 

TRANSCRIPT: RURAL DESIGNATION FOR GULF ISLAND COMMUNITIES

 

A. Olsen:

The southern Gulf Islands, Salt Spring Island and Juan de Fuca communities are rural, but because they are electoral areas within the capital regional district, they are deemed urban.

 

The urban designation limits these communities from applying for important grants for rural communities outside the CRD. For years, electoral area directors Dave Howe, Gary Holman and Mike Hicks have advocated for change.

 

They could only be deemed rural, though — they were told — if they were included within the Island Coastal Economic Trust, or ICET.

 

There has been an enormous amount of advocacy for change that should have been done long ago. The province has consulted with ICET for more than three and a half years.

 

Wouldn’t you know it, on Sunday, September 20, on the eve of the snap election called, the B.C. NDP issued Order-in-Council 533 to pass a designation change for the ICET. However, the NDP made only a change to the Premier’s riding. Juan de Fuca was added, while the Gulf Islands were left out.

 

My question is to the Minister of Jobs, Economic Recovery and Innovation. Has the minister issued the second half of that pre-election order to change the urban designation of the Gulf Island communities in my riding?

 

Hon. R. Kahlon:

I want to thank the member for the question — my first question in the Legislature. I appreciate him asking. And I also appreciate his letter that came to me, I think, 30 minutes after I was sworn in as the minister for this file.

 

What I can commit to the member is that I’m happy to continue this conversation with him after this chamber rises today. It’s certainly something we are reviewing right now. I’ve asked staff to get me a full briefing on that, and it’s scheduled for next week.

 

A. Olsen:

I appreciate the invitation to have another conversation. The reality for the southern Gulf Island communities and for Salt Spring Island is that they’ve been conversing about this with this government.

 

I’ve been conversing with this government, with successive ministers in that ministry for the last 3½ years. The advocacy has been going on for more than 7 years.

 

The idea that these communities in the southern Gulf Islands are anything but rural — I know that many members across the way know very well how rural these communities are.

 

To think that we would have to be continuing a conversation about whether or not these communities are rural is absurd.

 

The reality here is that without this designation change, these communities do not get access to grants that they rightly deserve — for example, for COVID recovery.

 

These communities are tourism-based communities that have been hit so hard by COVID, they are in and having an extensional crisis right now, this moment. So, we can continue to converse about this, or we can just do the order that needs to be done that was done easily.

 

In fact, what’s really crazy about this is that there was an act. There were words on paper. All they did was exclude the communities from my riding.

 

This is excluding them from being able to apply for broadband access which is going to help diversify their economy.

 

This is likely going to exclude them from applying for money that this government announced earlier this week for mental health and addictions treatment.

 

We’re done having a conversation in the southern Gulf Islands. We need action.

 

My preference is that the minister put through the order to complement the Premier’s advantage that his communities got. My question is to the minister. “When is he going to do it?”

 

Hon. R. Kahlon:

Again, thank you to the member. As I said, I’m happy to have our first conversation, not a continued conversation.

 

What I would say to the member, and I think he raises concerns around tourism…. I know that many people in the tourism industry have been greatly impacted by the challenges of the pandemic. And you know, we have $19.4 million available for tourism-dependent communities. I’m sure we can talk to the member, also, about how some of those communities can have access to that funding.

 

But again to the issue that he raises, as I committed to him in the previous question, I’m certainly happy to meet with him. I look forward to my briefing with my new deputy minister as well, and we’ll get back to him shortly.

 

Adam Olsen (SȾHENEP) ... is the MLA for Saanich North and the Islands and member of the B.C. Green Caucus.

He was first elected to the British Columbia Legislative Assembly in May 2017 and re-elected in October 2020.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more