Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ADAM OLSEN - Continuing a conversation about whether or not these communities are rural is absurd

 


For nearly a decade Capital Regional District (CRD) Electoral Area Directors from Salt Spring Island, the Southern Gulf Islands and Juan de Fuca have been advocating for a change in their designation from urban to rural.

 

There is no doubt that these unincorporated communities are rural, however because they are members of the CRD they are deemed urban. As a result, they are not able to apply for important supports designed for rural communities.

 

The BC NDP finally made the change on the eve of the snap election this Fall.

 

However, the change was not afforded to all the communities, only the communities in Premier John Horgan’s riding (Juan de Fuca) benefited from Order in Council 533.

 

In Question Period I asked new Hon. Ravi Kahlon, new Minister of Jobs, Economic Recovery, and Innovation about this situation.

 

 

TRANSCRIPT: RURAL DESIGNATION FOR GULF ISLAND COMMUNITIES

 

A. Olsen:

The southern Gulf Islands, Salt Spring Island and Juan de Fuca communities are rural, but because they are electoral areas within the capital regional district, they are deemed urban.

 

The urban designation limits these communities from applying for important grants for rural communities outside the CRD. For years, electoral area directors Dave Howe, Gary Holman and Mike Hicks have advocated for change.

 

They could only be deemed rural, though — they were told — if they were included within the Island Coastal Economic Trust, or ICET.

 

There has been an enormous amount of advocacy for change that should have been done long ago. The province has consulted with ICET for more than three and a half years.

 

Wouldn’t you know it, on Sunday, September 20, on the eve of the snap election called, the B.C. NDP issued Order-in-Council 533 to pass a designation change for the ICET. However, the NDP made only a change to the Premier’s riding. Juan de Fuca was added, while the Gulf Islands were left out.

 

My question is to the Minister of Jobs, Economic Recovery and Innovation. Has the minister issued the second half of that pre-election order to change the urban designation of the Gulf Island communities in my riding?

 

Hon. R. Kahlon:

I want to thank the member for the question — my first question in the Legislature. I appreciate him asking. And I also appreciate his letter that came to me, I think, 30 minutes after I was sworn in as the minister for this file.

 

What I can commit to the member is that I’m happy to continue this conversation with him after this chamber rises today. It’s certainly something we are reviewing right now. I’ve asked staff to get me a full briefing on that, and it’s scheduled for next week.

 

A. Olsen:

I appreciate the invitation to have another conversation. The reality for the southern Gulf Island communities and for Salt Spring Island is that they’ve been conversing about this with this government.

 

I’ve been conversing with this government, with successive ministers in that ministry for the last 3½ years. The advocacy has been going on for more than 7 years.

 

The idea that these communities in the southern Gulf Islands are anything but rural — I know that many members across the way know very well how rural these communities are.

 

To think that we would have to be continuing a conversation about whether or not these communities are rural is absurd.

 

The reality here is that without this designation change, these communities do not get access to grants that they rightly deserve — for example, for COVID recovery.

 

These communities are tourism-based communities that have been hit so hard by COVID, they are in and having an extensional crisis right now, this moment. So, we can continue to converse about this, or we can just do the order that needs to be done that was done easily.

 

In fact, what’s really crazy about this is that there was an act. There were words on paper. All they did was exclude the communities from my riding.

 

This is excluding them from being able to apply for broadband access which is going to help diversify their economy.

 

This is likely going to exclude them from applying for money that this government announced earlier this week for mental health and addictions treatment.

 

We’re done having a conversation in the southern Gulf Islands. We need action.

 

My preference is that the minister put through the order to complement the Premier’s advantage that his communities got. My question is to the minister. “When is he going to do it?”

 

Hon. R. Kahlon:

Again, thank you to the member. As I said, I’m happy to have our first conversation, not a continued conversation.

 

What I would say to the member, and I think he raises concerns around tourism…. I know that many people in the tourism industry have been greatly impacted by the challenges of the pandemic. And you know, we have $19.4 million available for tourism-dependent communities. I’m sure we can talk to the member, also, about how some of those communities can have access to that funding.

 

But again to the issue that he raises, as I committed to him in the previous question, I’m certainly happy to meet with him. I look forward to my briefing with my new deputy minister as well, and we’ll get back to him shortly.

 

Adam Olsen (SȾHENEP) ... is the MLA for Saanich North and the Islands and member of the B.C. Green Caucus.

He was first elected to the British Columbia Legislative Assembly in May 2017 and re-elected in October 2020.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2027: After a Decade of Decline, NDP Budget Delivers an Assault on Seniors, Working Families, and Small Businesses

Peter Milobar, BC Conservative Finance Critic, condemned the NDP government’s latest budget as the result of a decade of decline that has left British Columbians broke, unsafe, and paying more for less.   “After ten years of NDP mismanagement, this budget is an assault on seniors, working families, and the small businesses that drive our economy,” said Milobar. “The NDP have turned their back on the people working hardest to make ends meet and the seniors who built this province.” Milobar pointed to a new $1.1 billion annual income tax increase and warned that the government is piling new costs onto households already struggling with affordability.   “This government keeps asking British Columbians for more, while delivering less,” Milobar said. “The question people are asking is simple: Where has all the money gone?” Milobar noted that BC has gone from a surplus in the first year of NDP government to a projected deficit of more than $13 billion this year, while prov...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...

Labels

Show more