Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ADAM OLSEN -- Despite different rhetoric Horgan government clings to decades old approach to Indigenous relations

 

The source of uncertainty about lands and resources in British Columbia is rooted in the failure of successive governments to uphold the rights of Indigenous peoples.


 

Let’s be clear – conflict and contention over the land base doesn’t come from honouring human rights, it comes from denying and violating them. For decades British Columbia has followed a policy of litigating about whether Indigenous rights even exist, and negotiating in long, expensive, and unprincipled ways that rarely have outcomes. The result is nothing is resolved. And the Horgan government is no different.

 

Europeans arrived in North America and claimed the land was empty, with no humans living here. This was the doctrine of terra nullius – nobody’s land. Paired with the Doctrine of Discovery, which goes back to 1494 when the Treaty of Tordesillas determined that non-Christian lands could be colonized, Europeans asserted sovereignty to the land and resources that now make up Canada.

 

Today, of course, we reject these doctrines for what they are – racist and destructive. But they remain at the foundation of what led to the formation of British Columbia. And they remain embedded in the laws, policies, and practices of government today.

 

We see this playing out regarding old growth forests. For months we have been calling on Premier John Horgan to implement all the recommendations of his old growth review panel. Thousands of British Columbians have joined in the call to protect the last remaining stands of ancient, monumental old growth forests.

 

Premier Horgan and Minister of Forests, Lands, and Natural Resource Operations Katrine Conroy have been claiming they are doing the work needed to protect these trees. Unfortunately, the Premier and Minister have been talking out of both sides of their mouth.

 

On one hand, Premier Horgan is stating he recognizes Indigenous rights and title. On the other hand, his Minister of Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation Murray Rankin, is advancing the same old models of forestry agreements put in place by the BC Liberals over a decade ago.

 

These agreements are based on the denial of Indigenous rights – saying rights are “asserted”, not accepting they exist, and not recognizing that Nations have any ownership in lands and resources.

 

Premier Horgan talks about Indigenous sovereignty, rights, and title. Yet the Attorney General continues to advance the same litigation positions that Crown governments have taken for decades. Right now, as I write this, BC taxpayers are funding their government to argue in court in multiple pieces of litigation something different than what the government says publicly: that certain Indigenous people do not exist as a people, that their rights have been extinguished – if they ever had any in the first place – and that even if there are rights, they are effectively meaningless.

 

Why does this happen? Because in its laws, policies, and practices, British Columbia is still denying Indigenous title and rights.

 

In Budget Estimates I asked the Attorney General about this. (See our 30 minute exchange here.) He said that until title has been negotiated in treaty, or decided by the Courts through litigation, the Crown maintains control of the land and resources.

 

This is the old position of denial. It is also not what the Supreme Court of Canada has said. The Courts have been explicit. Title does not exist because an agreement or court says it does. Title exists because of the prior use and occupation of First Nations. Title exists where it exists – because of the history and contemporary reality of the relationship of Indigenous peoples to these lands and resources.

 

The responsibility of government is to reconcile with the pre-existing sovereignty of Indigenous peoples. To say that before that occurs, we need to litigate or have a treaty is a denial of title and rights.

 

The government also knows that treaty negotiations have languished in our province. Negotiation tables have been open for decades with only a few treaties getting to a final agreement. They have been frustrating and expensive, with little hope of success because of Crown policies and mandates. The treaty process in British Columbia and Canada is yet another sad reflection of colonialism.

 

In this policy of inaction – through grinding, endless treaty negotiations and expensive, divisive, and endless litigation – this government is behaving the same as governments past. It comes to First Nations with an interim benefits agreement, with the purpose of securing Crown opportunities to continue harvesting the resources off the land that have been at the centre of the dispute for the past century and a half.

 

These are the same approaches and agreements that that the former colleagues of Minister Conroy and Minister Rankin spoke passionately against when they were in opposition.

 

Former Forests Minister Doug Donaldson called them “take it or leave it” agreements. In 2014, Donaldson said, “As we know, many First Nations communities are in very, very difficult socio-economic times.”

 

He continued, “I think First Nations for decades have seen natural resources off unceded territories leave their area by the truckload, by the trainload, and then there’s an opportunity presented by the provincial government with a take-it-or-leave-it approach to say, “Here’s a percentage of that that you can have,” of course, it’s going to make a difference in some people’s lives within the community. Let’s not discount that, but the fact is that it’s based on a history of a very uneven and unlevel playing field.”

 

It is disturbing that Premier Horgan knows this yet continues the same practice. Yes, with different rhetoric. But the same practice.

 

At the end of my exchange with the Attorney General in Budget Estimates he said the situation is not as “grim” as I have outlined. It depends on your perspective Minister.

 

The historic and current landscape is grim, in fact, it’s worse than grim, it’s slippery, it’s slimy, frankly Minister, it’s grotesque.

 

Adam Olsen (SȾHENEP) ... is the MLA-elect for Saanich North and the Islands and member of the B.C. Green Caucus. He was first elected to the British Columbia Legislative Assembly in May 2017 and re-elected in October 2020.

 

Born in Victoria, BC, Adam has lived, worked and played his entire life on the Saanich Peninsula. He is a member of Tsartlip First Nation (W̱JOȽEȽP), where he and his wife, Emily, are raising their two children, Silas and Ella.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2027: After a Decade of Decline, NDP Budget Delivers an Assault on Seniors, Working Families, and Small Businesses

Peter Milobar, BC Conservative Finance Critic, condemned the NDP government’s latest budget as the result of a decade of decline that has left British Columbians broke, unsafe, and paying more for less.   “After ten years of NDP mismanagement, this budget is an assault on seniors, working families, and the small businesses that drive our economy,” said Milobar. “The NDP have turned their back on the people working hardest to make ends meet and the seniors who built this province.” Milobar pointed to a new $1.1 billion annual income tax increase and warned that the government is piling new costs onto households already struggling with affordability.   “This government keeps asking British Columbians for more, while delivering less,” Milobar said. “The question people are asking is simple: Where has all the money gone?” Milobar noted that BC has gone from a surplus in the first year of NDP government to a projected deficit of more than $13 billion this year, while prov...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...

Labels

Show more