Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED – The solution has to be made in Canada for Canadians, which includes Indigenous people

 


Denying responsibility is expected from this (federal Liberal) government. It has a history of irresponsibility. Millions agree that lurching from one scandal to another is not an indication of accountability, openness, prudence and responsibility.

It is unacceptable that the government should take the position that it has the right to command the teaching of Christian doctrine to anyone. That violates common law precedence of separating church and state in effect for centuries before the Charter.

The constitutional relationship between the federal government and Indigenous people is unique and involves a consequential fiduciary responsibility.

The discovery of children's bodies on the grounds of the Kamloops Residential School has led to hysterical and poorly considered commentary.

When the school opened in 1890, child mortality rates were very high. Charges that the deaths of these children were deliberate (murders) are not credible or substantiated.

That does not detract from oral records of malnutrition and abuse. The body of evidence is too large and consistent to deny, and liability arises from that. The disrespect of not maintaining records of deaths and notifying families is not forgivable.

Even in the circumstances as upsetting as discovery of the grave site, follow the money. Who stood to gain by suppressing records of the deaths? Who wrote and cashed the cheques? That is where the documentation is.

The federal government had an obligation to check on its residential school contractors. The existence of unmarked graves of school residents should not be a surprise. Since the residential schools were not monitored, the federal government is responsible for searching diligently to establish how bad the problem is.

The contractors (operators) of the residential schools have a liability. They contracted to culturally reprogram children. That did not include a license to abuse their charges. The federal government has an inescapable constitutional responsibility for indigenous people and their lands. That will drive the court action.

Our standards and values were significantly different at the start of the 20th century. In the early 1900s, women were still considered chattels and unable to hold office or vote. Looking at history through 21st century lenses affects what we think we see and understand.

Indigenous people and our governments are walking into a trap by considering UNDRIP as a solution. That lets our government off the hook and does not solve problems in indigenous relations.

The solution has to be made in Canada for Canadians, which includes Indigenous people. UNDRIP is not compatible with our constitution or with existing treaties. Is UNDRIP to replace treaties? UNDRIP cannot alter our constitution, and risks us getting into a tangled mess of competing laws that will delay reconciliation indefinitely. 

 

John Feldsted ... is a political commentator, consultant, and strategist. He makes his home in Winnipeg, Manitoba.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 
Post a Comment
Read more

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more