Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FORSETH – While I’m NOT advocating government should be making these kinds of investments, should taxpayers not be getting a ‘return’ if they do?

 


THIRTY-FIVE POINT SIX ONE EIGHT MILLION dollars!

In little more than 10 weeks (since March 26th), that is how much the government of British Columbia has outright given to major telecoms and internet service providers. The reality is, however, Premier John Horgan’s NDP government has simply passed on money we are forced to give -- through taxes we have little to no say in.

And the major beneficiaries of this government largess, through the Connecting British Columbia program?

Rogers, who had net earnings of 1.725 BILLION dollars in 2020 -- and Telus who had a ‘55 percent revenue growth to $1.6 billion in 2020’.


June 8th ... up to $3.07 million to Telus and Swift Internet for four projects (Shuswap and around south Kootenay Lake) ...

June 3rd ... Telus will receive up to $3.6 million to upgrade the performance of internet access in northern communities...

May 18th ... will provide Telus up to $2.9 million toward the cost of improving the performance and reliability of internet access in Dogwood Valley, Squeah, Yale and parts of Skawahlook, Chawathil and Yale First Nations ...

May 5th ... providing Telus up to $844,000 for the cellular project in Wells and up to $911,000 for the infrastructure in Perow ...

May 4th ... ABC Communications received $334,100 to cover half of the estimated cost of connecting people in Clinton with modern high-speed internet ...


May 3rd ...
Rogers will receive up to $5.47 million toward the estimated $6.4-million cost of filling in cellular gaps along 68 kilometres of Highway 97 between Chetwynd and the Highway 39 junction ...

April 7th ... will provide Rogers $4.5 million towards the $11.6-million cost of installing cellular infrastructure to provide cellular coverage ... between Prince Rupert and Smithers ...

April 7th ... Rogers Communications Ltd. has been selected to receive up to $4.9 million towards the cost of building the infrastructure (Cellular service is being expanded to include a 70-kilometre stretch of Highway 14 between Sooke and Port Renfrew) ...

March 26th ... CityWest will receive more than $10 million to enhance connectivity for more than 2,800 households in places like Whaletown, Granite Bay and 4 mile, as well as communities within the territories of the Haida Nation, Nuxalk Nation, Ehattesaht First Nation and Klahoose First Nation ...


Are these rural communities and areas deserving of better telecommunications and internet services? Of course they are, however, why should tax-payers be footing the bills for the infrastructure being built by businesses already earning billions?

And while I’m NOT advocating government should be making these kinds of investments, should taxpayers not be getting a ‘return’ if they do? If nothing else, there should be a pay-back period on this money which is being given -- on our behalf -- to Rogers, Telus, and others.

Providing services to rural communities does come at a higher cost, but I’m not sure it should be the taxpayers of BC that should footing the bill for that cost. After all ... there’s little likelihood telecoms and internet service providers are in any danger of losing money given the revenues they continue to earn.

I’m interested in your thoughts – what say you?


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more