Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FEDLSTED -- Three decades of hype and hyperbole, from the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, is no longer effective


As the following news stories will attest, the United Nations COP25 climate change conference in Madrid, Spain spun itself into a disaster. Reports on one of the most expensive and useless gab fests in current political annals are dismal:











The world is not facing a climate crisis. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) however, is suffering a credibility crisis.

UNFCCC demands that developed and developing nations stop economic growth to reduce carbon emissions have hit an impenetrable stone wall. Governments will not accept climate plans that reduce their standards of living and stifle economic development. They are aware that the societies they serve will not stand for it.

People want to improve or at least maintain the standards of living they have become accustomed to.

COP25 finally collapsed into a melee of nations demanding that someone else accept the reductions in living standards and economic development that meeting Paris Accord targets require.

Three decades of hype and hyperbole, from the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, is no longer effective.
With each passing year the failure of predictions to manifest, are more obvious, along with the increase in hysteria because countries will not adhere to United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change dictates.



Most delegates to the COP25 conference have one thing in common – they are not accountable for the results of their demands for changes in how free world economies operate. They are not accountable or responsible for anything.

The falling out of COP25 nations has not been reported in the Canadian media. We should be outraged at government insistence that we meet Paris Agreement carbon emission reduction targets.

Climate change is a world-wide problem. If the world nations are not on board to make the changes the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change is demanding, which is now obvious, our government has no reason or right to impose sanctions on us that can have no effect on climate change in Canada or elsewhere.

Collapse of the UNFCCC COP25 is sound reason for our withdrawal from the United Nations. We must not support an organization that is incapable of sound leadership.

The United Nations was not created to deal with climate. It has failed at its primary functions of promoting and maintaining world peace. It is equally inept at understanding and adapting to climate change.

The insanity must end.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2027: After a Decade of Decline, NDP Budget Delivers an Assault on Seniors, Working Families, and Small Businesses

Peter Milobar, BC Conservative Finance Critic, condemned the NDP government’s latest budget as the result of a decade of decline that has left British Columbians broke, unsafe, and paying more for less.   “After ten years of NDP mismanagement, this budget is an assault on seniors, working families, and the small businesses that drive our economy,” said Milobar. “The NDP have turned their back on the people working hardest to make ends meet and the seniors who built this province.” Milobar pointed to a new $1.1 billion annual income tax increase and warned that the government is piling new costs onto households already struggling with affordability.   “This government keeps asking British Columbians for more, while delivering less,” Milobar said. “The question people are asking is simple: Where has all the money gone?” Milobar noted that BC has gone from a surplus in the first year of NDP government to a projected deficit of more than $13 billion this year, while prov...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...

Labels

Show more