Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- Hanging the leader following an election, that failed to transpire as predicted, maybe satisfying to a minority, but does not address systemic internal problems


Postponement of the April Conservative Party of Canada convention, to November, is not a surprise. The Party National Council failed the Party membership by not curtailing efforts to push Andrew Scheer out.

The decision on whether a leadership contest was required was up to the delegates to the April convention. No group of party members has the authority or right to usurp the Party constitution and the authority of delegates to convention. Intervention was needed and did not happen.

The “leak” of an arrangement between the Party and Mr. Scheer on school tuition fees was unethical and those involved were in breach of confidentiality clauses and failed to protect the interests of the Party and its members. No amount of lipstick will make that pig presentable.

Instead of dealing with the culprits, the Conservative Fund chose to dismiss the Executive Director although the Fund does not choose or approve the person appointed. It appears that Mr. van Vugt was dismissed because Fund officials were embarrassed by the leak.

CBC Radio quotes Zehavi Zynoberg as a ‘commentator’. Zynoberg’s relatively short (5 year) history in politics has been entirely with the Ontario government (2 years as a constituency assistant, one year as a legislative assistant, and one year as a public engagement advisor) and part of this year as an advisor to a Toronto City Councillor. He is unqualified to speak for the federal Party.

Mr. Scheer and his team handled the October election campaign badly. I doubt that he would have survived the April convention, but in politics, four months is an eternity. Part of the problem for the Conservative Party was overconfidence that it would win in October. The convention should have been set for late January (about 90 days after the election) to avoid the mess that the Party is currently in.


The Party Leader is spokesperson for the Party and Leader in the House of Commons. It takes many more people to manage the Party as an effective support for the political wing (the Leader and elected MPs), manager of Electoral District Associations, manager of memberships, the fundraising arm and dozens of other operational duties.

Hanging the leader following an election that failed to transpire as predicted maybe satisfying to a minority but does not address systemic internal problems. There are serious rumblings of campaign and National Council interference in the candidate selection process across the country. That resulted in a reduction in support for the Party.

Efforts to dump Mr. Scheer prematurely, and unconstitutionally, have seriously damaged the Party brand. The Party appears leaderless and rudderless. The lack of a Party public relations effort is hurtful and uninspiring. The Conservative Party machine has sputtered to the roadside and sits there a derelict awaiting some competent and knowledgeable mechanics who are not on the horizon.

The National Council that presided during the election remains in place until the postponed convention. It must substantially up its game to prevent the party from suffering further disintegration and deterioration.

John Feldsted
Political Commentator, Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more