Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- Hanging the leader following an election, that failed to transpire as predicted, maybe satisfying to a minority, but does not address systemic internal problems


Postponement of the April Conservative Party of Canada convention, to November, is not a surprise. The Party National Council failed the Party membership by not curtailing efforts to push Andrew Scheer out.

The decision on whether a leadership contest was required was up to the delegates to the April convention. No group of party members has the authority or right to usurp the Party constitution and the authority of delegates to convention. Intervention was needed and did not happen.

The “leak” of an arrangement between the Party and Mr. Scheer on school tuition fees was unethical and those involved were in breach of confidentiality clauses and failed to protect the interests of the Party and its members. No amount of lipstick will make that pig presentable.

Instead of dealing with the culprits, the Conservative Fund chose to dismiss the Executive Director although the Fund does not choose or approve the person appointed. It appears that Mr. van Vugt was dismissed because Fund officials were embarrassed by the leak.

CBC Radio quotes Zehavi Zynoberg as a ‘commentator’. Zynoberg’s relatively short (5 year) history in politics has been entirely with the Ontario government (2 years as a constituency assistant, one year as a legislative assistant, and one year as a public engagement advisor) and part of this year as an advisor to a Toronto City Councillor. He is unqualified to speak for the federal Party.

Mr. Scheer and his team handled the October election campaign badly. I doubt that he would have survived the April convention, but in politics, four months is an eternity. Part of the problem for the Conservative Party was overconfidence that it would win in October. The convention should have been set for late January (about 90 days after the election) to avoid the mess that the Party is currently in.


The Party Leader is spokesperson for the Party and Leader in the House of Commons. It takes many more people to manage the Party as an effective support for the political wing (the Leader and elected MPs), manager of Electoral District Associations, manager of memberships, the fundraising arm and dozens of other operational duties.

Hanging the leader following an election that failed to transpire as predicted maybe satisfying to a minority but does not address systemic internal problems. There are serious rumblings of campaign and National Council interference in the candidate selection process across the country. That resulted in a reduction in support for the Party.

Efforts to dump Mr. Scheer prematurely, and unconstitutionally, have seriously damaged the Party brand. The Party appears leaderless and rudderless. The lack of a Party public relations effort is hurtful and uninspiring. The Conservative Party machine has sputtered to the roadside and sits there a derelict awaiting some competent and knowledgeable mechanics who are not on the horizon.

The National Council that presided during the election remains in place until the postponed convention. It must substantially up its game to prevent the party from suffering further disintegration and deterioration.

John Feldsted
Political Commentator, Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more