Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- If this government can’t design a simplified system that we can live with, we need to find a government that can do the job


Story Reference:  Liberals move to deliver tax cut they say will help 20 million Canadians. Finance minister says new measure will lower taxes for people earning less than about $150K a year

This is a classic exercise in making an announcement of doing (almost) nothing. The Basic Personal Amount (BPA) for personal federal income tax 2018 was $11,809, increasing to $12,069 for 2019, and scheduled to be $12,298 for 2020.

According to Finance Minister Bill Morneau, the increase from 2020 to 2023 will be from $12,069 (2019) to $15,000 by 2023 spread over four years -- that works out to about $733 per year. 

The 2020 BPA will be $12,802 rather than $12, 298 -- or an increase of $504. 

Morneau is adding complexity to an already incomprehensible Tax Act.

At a basic tax rate of 15% a taxpayer will save ($504 x .15 =) $75.60 or $6.30 per month in 2020. That will not offset carbon taxes or other pressured on increases in cost of living. There is also a catch to increases in BPA; if an employee does not file a new TD1 form with his employer in January, deductions will be based on the last TD1 form filed and payroll deductions will not diminish. The benefit will not be realized until the tax forms are filed in the following year.

What is particularly irking is that for taxpayers in the lowest two tax brackets – 15% (roughly $60K gross and under) and 20.5% (Roughly $61K to $120K gross), what matters is net income, that is income after taxes, CPP premiums and EI deductions.


  • Canada Pension Plan (CPP) premiums of 5.1% kick in on all earnings from $3,000 to $60,000.
  • Employment Insurance (EI) premiums of 1.62% apply to all earnings $55,000 and under.A person earning $37,000 annual sees about $5,600 or 15% of his or her gross pay eaten up by federal taxes, CPP premiums and EI premiums.
  • A person earning $140,000 annual sees about $28,250 or 20% of his or her gross pay eaten up by federal tax, CPP and EI.
  • Add in provincial income tax and the situation for those earning $120K or less is even more dire.


There are better solutions

The first ... is to overhaul the entire Employment Insurance program, which has become a welfare system.


Rules should be universal across Canada and not tweaked by province or region. Maternity benefits, parental leave, and coverage for illness and disability should be separate, opt-in programs with separate premiums. Students working to raise funds to offset tuition should be able to opt out of EI premiums if they are attending accredited college, university or apprentice programs.

The second ... is to raise the earning limits for the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) -- without changing the benefits levels -- and eliminating disability coverage. That can provide funding for increases in Old Age Security (OAS) and Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) programs to assist pensioners dependent on CPP for their retirement income and living in poverty. That is preferable to raising income tax rates for the wealthy.

The third ... is to simplify our federal income tax system.

There is no justification for the highly complex and cumbersome tome we currently suffer with. If this government can’t design a simplified system that we can live with, we need to find a government that can do the job.


John Feldsted
Political Commentator, Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...

Labels

Show more