Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FORSETH ~~ The comments of Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland echo hollow and unfulfilled from afar in Ottawa


Just the other day, from the Alberta government, came news regarding the on-going, and apparently never ending, softwood lumber dispute:

Their government’s Minister of Agriculture and Forestry, Devin Dreeshen let it be known that … “We are disappointed with the US International Trade Commission’s finding that Canadian softwood lumber hurts the US industry. Alberta will continue to support Canada in defending our forest sector through litigation and appeals, including at the World Trade Organization”.

“We will continue making our case until it’s understood that the Canada-U.S. softwood lumber trade creates benefits on both sides of the border. The imposition of US duties on Canadian softwood lumber is completely baseless.”


Regrettably the comments of then Minister of Foreign Affairs (now Deputy Prime Minister, Chrystia Freeland -– back in early September -- seem hollow and echo as empty from afar in Ottawa.

“US duties on Canadian softwood lumber are unfair and unwarranted … we will continue to strongly defend our softwood lumber industry and its workers.”

So how has that gone for Canada, the defense of our softwood lumber sector – especially here in BC?

Not very well, according to Cathy McLeod, the Conservative Shadow Minister, Natural Resources (Forestry & Mining).  

When I spoke with her about the situation, late on Thursday afternoon, she stated:
“Deputy Prime Minister Freeland repeatedly told the House of Commons that Canada is challenging the tariffs at the World Trade Organization, where we have a history of winning cases. However, the WTO is currently in disarray, since the United States is blocking new appointees to the organization’s Appellate Body, which has paused all operations. The Liberal Government has not presented Canadians with an alternative plan for resolving the issue”.

McLeod then went on to tell me; “ ... the Trudeau Liberals have failed to get a softwood lumber agreement with the United States, and softwood is absent from the USMCA (NAFTA 2)”.

“Closures and curtailments of softwood lumber mills continue to devastate rural communities across British Columbia. There are numerous factors, but crippling US tariffs are creating unnecessary strain on the industry”, she concluded.

And McLeod is accurate in that statement.


Still for a number of reasons, not just punitive duties on softwood lumber, BC’s forest industry is in near collapse, with numerous mills closed forever, shift reductions, along with short-term shutdowns.

According to the BC Liberals, one factor is the unwillingness of the NDP to intervene in the near six-month strike between Western Forest Products, and the United Steelworkers – a strike which is causing economic suffering throughout forestry-dependent coastal communities.  They have indicated that workers, desperate to get back to work, continue to plead for action from John Horgan and his provincial NDP government.

“The government has options that could end this strike and get 3,000 forestry workers and contractors back to work right away,” said Liberal Forestry Critic, and MLA, MLA John Rustad.

“It’s been over a year since the NDP introduced its failed Coast Forest Sector Revitalization program and yesterday’s flip-flop by Forestry Minister Doug Donaldson confirms there was no economic analysis done in the first place … and it’s forestry workers that are left paying the price. In the midst of a crisis, this government continues to make things up as it goes along.”


While angry meetings with out-of-work forest workers in Port Hardy and Port McNeill took place on Thursday with North Island MLA Claire Trevena and Forestry Minister Doug Donaldson, according to the Liberals, the government offered nothing and only created more market uncertainty in the industry by announcing a temporary retreat from recently announced policies that will continue to drive up costs and make the BC forest industry even less competitive.

“The pattern of failure that has led to a crisis in the interior’s forest industry is being repeated once again here on the coast,” said Rustad.

“The fact the NDP is … weighing down the industry with all sorts of new fees and penalties only demonstrates that they were wrong-headed in the first place … and this week the labour minister confirmed the NDP won’t lift a finger to help forest workers. This is a complete gong show”, Rustad concluded.

With just four days before Christmas, many families of those who have been working in BC’s forestry sector are facing a bleak year ahead.  Others are likely counting themselves lucky if they’ve only had reduced shifts, or temporary shutdowns.

Rustad is right … this is a complete gong show!
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...
Post a Comment
Read more

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more