Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Cracking the case of the secret chicken price hike (Troy Media)


No one begrudges farmers a fair living. However, chicken farmers need to be up-front as to why they need a price increase

We deeply value our farmers and rely on their hard work to provide us with essential food. Most farmers are eager to share their stories and take pride in their work.

However, when it comes to supply-managed sectors, such as dairy, eggs, and poultry, the dynamics are a bit different, particularly regarding the prices they can charge to processors. The challenge of transparency persists in these sectors.

Supply management involves government-sanctioned quotas granted to farmers to produce the specific amount of food required, and no more. This system helps protect the Canadian market from exorbitant prices on imports, resulting in greater supply and price stability than other commodities. It’s important to understand that when production costs rise, the prices farmers receive must also increase. This is a straightforward principle.

In Canada, it is nearly impossible for dairy, egg, or poultry farmers to incur losses due to the protective measures in place. However, there’s been an unusual development in British Columbia, where the board representing chicken farmers has sought to increase chicken prices without disclosing their reasons.

The board has requested provincial government approval for a new pricing scheme that could potentially drive retail prices even higher. Unfortunately, farmers have remained tight-lipped about their motives and explanations.

In response, organizations like Restaurants Canada and the Canadian Federation of Independent Grocers are urging the British Columbia government to intervene and address the proposed changes in the farm-level chicken pricing system. They believe such changes could lead to a 10 percent or potentially higher increase in consumer prices.

Poultry prices in British Columbia have soared in recent years, especially since the onset of the pandemic in 2020. According to Statistics Canada, since 2020, chicken prices have risen by around 15 to 20 percent, a relatively modest increase compared to other food categories. But in British Columbia, chicken is not cheap. The prices of chicken breasts and thighs are 15.1 and 17.5 percent higher than the national average, respectively.

Chicken drumsticks are an astonishing 40.5 percent above the national average, and whole chickens are priced over 50 percent higher. Retail prices are already significantly elevated in the province, and these differences are quite perplexing.

The role of chicken in the Canadian diet is substantial. The per capita consumption of chicken in Canada is approximately 36 kilograms, making it the country’s most popular source of animal protein, surpassing beef and pork by a considerable margin. Many well-known restaurant chains like KFC, Nando’s, McDonald’s, and Popeye’s heavily rely on affordable chicken to maintain stable menu prices. Unfortunately, these chains and consumers have limited influence in the current supply management system, which is a fundamental issue.

Some argue for the abolition of supply management for various reasons. While it is true that chicken prices in Canada are typically higher than in the United States, the system’s vertical co-ordination has proven advantageous, especially during the recent avian flu outbreaks. Nevertheless, the lack of transparency remains a significant concern.

Furthermore, the changes proposed in British Columbia could have ripple effects across the entire country, as similar boards exist in every province and could adopt similar pricing system modifications.

Farmers undoubtedly deserve to earn a fair livelihood. However, within a government-sanctioned quota system, chicken farmers should uphold their moral contract with the public by providing complete information and data to justify any necessary price increases.

If chicken prices need to rise, it is essential that chicken farmers share the data with the public to keep us informed and maintain trust in the system.

 

Dr. Sylvain Charlebois is senior director of the agri-food analytics lab and a professor in food distribution and policy at Dalhousie University.

© Troy Media


The views, opinions and positions expressed by all Troy Media columnists and contributors are the author's alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of Troy Media.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more