Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

RUSTAD: The indifference of political parties has led to very poor management decisions on the land base driven by politics, not science


What a mess BC’s forest industry has become. This NDP government does not seem to care about workers or communities. They are only focused on where they can get votes for the next election. 
 
To understand why the NDP is ignoring the plight of the forest sector you must consider where their votes come from.
 
There is a perception promoted by environmentalists that forestry is bad. They promote false information about old growth. They also try to suggest that forestry somehow is bad for our climate. All of these are false narratives but they are the reason why there is no champion of the forest sector in the NDP government. Or for that matter, there isn’t even a champion for forestry in the BC United party.
 
All the other political parties are afraid of the cancel culture. They are afraid of standing up for what is right. They are afraid of supporting a healthy forest sector. They are afraid of losing a vote.
 
Why does this matter? 
 
The indifference of political parties has led to policies and legislation making BC the highest cost jurisdiction in North America if not in the world. It has led to very poor management decisions on the land base driven by politics, not science. And ultimately it has led to the hollowing out of BC’s forest sector, the mass loss of jobs and the devastating impacts on families and communities.
 
In the case of Fraser Lake, the devastating decision to permanently close the mill was years in the making. The company says they made the decision because of a lack of economically viable timber. Unfortunately this is true.
 
But what does this mean? 
 
Economically viable timber is determined by the quality of the trees, the volume, the distance from a manufacturing facility, the efficiency of the sawmill and then most importantly, the costs. Costs are not just stumpage but they include how long it takes to get permits, taxes, regulations, reporting, etc…
 
BC’s cost structure (all inclusive) is now close to double most other jurisdictions. It takes years to get permits. Around 20% of the volume available in a supply area comes from BC Timber Sales and they are not making much wood available if any.
 
Ultimately BC has now become known as a hostile environment for doing business, especially in "resource sectors like forestry"
 
Forestry is not bad.In fact, BC’s forest sector should be viewed as a solution to so many issues. Wood products are the most environmentally friendly products we can use. The industry is renewable. 
 
Alternative products have many more impacts on our environment. BC should celebrate the contributions a healthy forest sector can provide. In the interior, old growth rhetoric is a completely false narrative. The vast majority of our forested area needs renewal. The environment historically has been dominated by wildfires. We stopped fire from being a management tool on the landscape. Trees became far older than they would historically have been able to. Forest health issues became enormous problems. Fuel loads were allowed to build. And when dry conditions happen, we can see the results with massive wildfires. So much must change to move BC’s forested landscape into a better management model.
 
Coming back to Fraser Lake, the decision to close the largest employer will have a significant ripple effect for the entire region. What can be done?
 
First and foremost, the government needs to step up to the plate and support the workers, families and communities being impacted. Training, bridging to retirement and other support is critical. Second, some analysis needs to be done regarding the timber supply areas, available fibre, barriers to accessing that fibre, cost structure and future projections. This work should be done by an independent third party with NO connections to BC’s government or political parties. Third, the work from that analysis needs to determine the opportunity for making fibre available for any company that might want to consider using that location for a future forestry operation.
 
It’s time to get serious about BC’s future. 
 
Since 1991 it has been 32 years, 16 BC Liberal and 16 NDP. Can anyone point to anything that is better? We can not solve today’s problems with the same level of thinking that has caused them. 
 
A new approach is needed. That is what the Conservative Party of BC will bring to British Columbia.



John Rustad is the MLA for Nechako Lakes, and the leader of the Conservative Party of BC.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more