Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FORSETH: Declaring something should be essential service, without ensuring the service is provided to British Columbians, is no solution


While the wheels of transit, in metro-Vancouver, sit idle, BC United leader Kevin Flacon has a solution:

“Frankly, these are essential services. People use transit to get to work, to get to doctors appointments — this is not something that should be getting in the way and interrupting the public.”

I find it interesting that Falcon has decided this is the solution, not because I disagree with him, but because I never thought I would hear the leader of ANY political party say it.

For as long as I can remember, I have always believed that if a service is provided by the government, then it should be deemed essential to the needs of British Columbians. The flip side of that, of course, would be that if it isn’t a service essential to our needs, then why should (or does) the government provide it?

But back to Falcon and his comment.

I realize he didn’t specifically say that IF transit is deemed essential, then workers shouldn’t be permitted to strike – he simply commented that transit should be considered essential.

The reality is, he wasn’t really offering a solution to the problem, his comment just made for a good 8 second (as they call them) sound bite.

Which leads me back to my initial wondering --- IF a government provides a service, then why are workers permitted strike action?

The same holds true for British Columbians youth – why are strikes permitted in education?

Or in healthcare?

Is there a better solution?  What might that look like?

Declaring something should be an essential service, without ensuring the service is actually provided to British Columbians, is no solution. It sounds good, but that’s about it. And sadly, no one in the media chose to challenge Falcon on his comment, and ask for an explanation as to what his proposal would look like.

There is a workable solution, we just have to take the time to figure it out so that the people of BC, and the employees who provide us with valuable and much needed service, can come up with it.

In Kamloops, I’m Alan Forseth.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more