Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FORSETH: Declaring something should be essential service, without ensuring the service is provided to British Columbians, is no solution


While the wheels of transit, in metro-Vancouver, sit idle, BC United leader Kevin Flacon has a solution:

“Frankly, these are essential services. People use transit to get to work, to get to doctors appointments — this is not something that should be getting in the way and interrupting the public.”

I find it interesting that Falcon has decided this is the solution, not because I disagree with him, but because I never thought I would hear the leader of ANY political party say it.

For as long as I can remember, I have always believed that if a service is provided by the government, then it should be deemed essential to the needs of British Columbians. The flip side of that, of course, would be that if it isn’t a service essential to our needs, then why should (or does) the government provide it?

But back to Falcon and his comment.

I realize he didn’t specifically say that IF transit is deemed essential, then workers shouldn’t be permitted to strike – he simply commented that transit should be considered essential.

The reality is, he wasn’t really offering a solution to the problem, his comment just made for a good 8 second (as they call them) sound bite.

Which leads me back to my initial wondering --- IF a government provides a service, then why are workers permitted strike action?

The same holds true for British Columbians youth – why are strikes permitted in education?

Or in healthcare?

Is there a better solution?  What might that look like?

Declaring something should be an essential service, without ensuring the service is actually provided to British Columbians, is no solution. It sounds good, but that’s about it. And sadly, no one in the media chose to challenge Falcon on his comment, and ask for an explanation as to what his proposal would look like.

There is a workable solution, we just have to take the time to figure it out so that the people of BC, and the employees who provide us with valuable and much needed service, can come up with it.

In Kamloops, I’m Alan Forseth.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...
Post a Comment
Read more

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more